Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:57 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Vice president's lesbian daughter pregnant
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostWed Dec 06, 2006 10:47 am    Vice president's lesbian daughter pregnant

Quote:

  • Washington Post reports Mary Cheney, 37, due in late spring
  • Cheney is openly gay, and she and her partner are "ecstatic," paper reports
  • VP Cheney's daughter Elizabeth had her fifth child in July
CNN



-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Dec 06, 2006 7:55 pm    

Wow. This is...shocking. I don't know quite what to make of it. Good for Mary Cheney, though.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostWed Dec 06, 2006 8:17 pm    

Why is it "shocking"?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Dec 06, 2006 8:39 pm    

teya wrote:
Why is it "shocking"?


Because it's the vice-president's daughter, and she's going to give birth to her baby and the granddaughter of the vice-president is going to have two moms is why it's shocking. I don't mean anything offensive by that - I really like Mary Cheney. The concept is just shocking, that's all.

Again, good for her, though.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
webtaz99
Commodore


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 9:20 am    

And some people still wonder why the terrorists hate us.....


-------signature-------

"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 10:51 am    

Wow, so cool! Congrats to her, I hope all things go well for her and her family.


-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 8:11 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
teya wrote:
Why is it "shocking"?


Because it's the vice-president's daughter, and she's going to give birth to her baby and the granddaughter of the vice-president is going to have two moms is why it's shocking. I don't mean anything offensive by that - I really like Mary Cheney. The concept is just shocking, that's all.

Again, good for her, though.


It's just so shocking when someone is gay?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 8:18 pm    

Oh please, we all know that's not what he was saying. Let's try to keep things in context and use a little common sense.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 8:25 pm    

^ Well, call me stupid, but I don't know what he is saying.

I see nothing shocking about it, and I still don't know why anyone would.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 8:28 pm    

Well, it seemed obvious to me that he meant that it's shocking due to VP Cheney's stance on homosexuality. Especially since he said "good for her" twice,


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 8:44 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
Well, it seemed obvious to me that he meant that it's shocking due to VP Cheney's stance on homosexuality. Especially since he said "good for her" twice,


That, the fact that he's in an administration with opposition to homosexual marriage and so forth, and the fact that this is the daughter of the vice-president. Not that she's gay, for I've known she was a lesbian all along, but those things. It's just shocking is all. Nothing more.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 9:45 pm    

Good for her! There are some FAAAAAAR Right (I didn't know such a place existed) whackos that are like ... condemning the child and calling her a monster. Sites are springing up all over the web. Its troubling.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 9:49 pm    

Starbuck wrote:
Good for her! There are some FAAAAAAR Right (I didn't know such a place existed) whackos that are like ... condemning the child and calling her a monster. Sites are springing up all over the web. Its troubling.


That is troubling. I may find moral disagreements with what she's doing and may not be partial to the idea of a child being raised by two mothers or two fathers, but I wouldn't go that far in the least. I am sure that her child will grow up pretty well in the Cheney family.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 10:04 pm    

The only thing I find troubling is that people take so much time out of their day to condemn someone only because they are unfortunate enough to be in the media's eye. :/

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostThu Dec 07, 2006 10:06 pm    

I'm honestly surprised that Dick Cheney hasn't publicly opposed this, or said he will not support them.

Maybe this can show to people that a child with two mothers can grow up just fine.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostFri Dec 08, 2006 12:18 am    

WeAz wrote:
I'm honestly surprised that Dick Cheney hasn't publicly opposed this, or said he will not support them.


You're surprised he's not going on the attack against his daughter!? Isn't that a little much?



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostFri Dec 08, 2006 1:11 am    

Publicly Yes
Privately, No.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
magenta
Commander


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 404
Location: AUSTRALIA

PostSat Dec 09, 2006 5:54 am    

Well I expect people wont like this!I am not against gay people.I have a few gay friends.BUT I believe a child needs a father and a mother 'figure' in their lives.
SORRY!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostSat Dec 09, 2006 7:15 pm    

magenta wrote:
Well I expect people wont like this!I am not against gay people.I have a few gay friends.BUT I believe a child needs a father and a mother 'figure' in their lives.
SORRY!

So what about single parents?


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
magenta
Commander


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 404
Location: AUSTRALIA

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 4:52 am    

kids doing 'ok' with one parent is not 'ok' to me.My parents split up when I was 9.My mother moved 1 and a half hours away from my dad.I went down for 'access' visits once a month.
I dont think back on my childhood with the thought that I did O.K.!My life would have been a lot better if I had regular contact with my dad.
No another woman as a substitute dad or second 'mum' would not be just ok.A child needs a man and a woman as parents,my opinion based on my own direct experience!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 5:21 am    

My aunt was widowed at the age of 32. Her husband died of a brain tumor. She had 2 children, ages 3 and 4 months.

Her kids grew up without a father. Yet, they survived and thrived. Why? Because there were other men in their lives--uncles, grandfathers--who acted as male figures.

Parental figures are--of necessity, sometimes--not only the biological parents. This is the advantage to extended families. There's no reason to assume that a child of gay parents will not have loving adults of the opposite gender to provide that balance.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 1:50 pm    

teya wrote:
Her kids grew up without a father. Yet, they survived and thrived. Why? Because there were other men in their lives--uncles, grandfathers--who acted as male figures.


That is one thing that has made me accept the idea of homosexual couples as parents. If the children have other persons in their lives that can accomodate for the lack of a parent of the opposite sex, it can work out. That's why, though, I think that in order for a homosexual couple to adopt children it should be required that they have someone of the opposite sex who can act as a parental figure for the opposite sex of the parental couple.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 5:45 pm    

How on Earth do you require something like that? It isn't as if just because someon is homosexual they cut themselves off entirely from the opposite sex. I can't think of anyone I know who is gay and doesn't have someone they consider close to them that is of the opposite sex.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 6:36 pm    

My neighbor's are lesbians, and they have a son. (Adopted from overseas). Because of their sexuality, their families cut themselves off. The kid is in my classes, and is one of the brightest people in the school. He didn't have a single male figure while growing up.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:08 pm    

TrekkieMage wrote:
How on Earth do you require something like that? It isn't as if just because someon is homosexual they cut themselves off entirely from the opposite sex. I can't think of anyone I know who is gay and doesn't have someone they consider close to them that is of the opposite sex.


Then it should be easy for them to meet that requirement, shouldn't it?

WeAz wrote:
My neighbor's are lesbians, and they have a son. (Adopted from overseas). Because of their sexuality, their families cut themselves off. The kid is in my classes, and is one of the brightest people in the school. He didn't have a single male figure while growing up.


Okay, so he's bright. But that doesn't mean that he's necessarily got that balance. Only a male figure can give him that.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com