Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:06 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Panel: Agencies "Dead Wrong" on Iraq WMD
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostThu Apr 07, 2005 10:40 pm    

Link, the Hero of Time wrote:
why do you automatically have to assume they were weapons?


What else would he be so secretly moving? I asked a question what everyone thinks they were?



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostFri Apr 08, 2005 10:52 am    

Some of his wealth maybe? ((Just suggesting something else)). Also how come they could tell there was shipments but not what was in them, or if they knew about them why didn't they stop them?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Apr 10, 2005 12:23 pm    

^Huh?


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 5:51 am    

Not sure what point you were making a reference to, but probably the second one. Why, if these shipments were spotted, weren't they stopped?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 9:31 am    

Who said they were spotted by people with the means to do anything? That's like saying, "If Saddam were such a tyrant, why didn't the people overthrow him years ago?"


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 10:44 am    

Jeremy wrote:
Not sure what point you were making a reference to, but probably the second one. Why, if these shipments were spotted, weren't they stopped?


These shipments were spotted BEFORE the war, BEFORE our troops were there, and with Syria's approval, I believe. Satelite survailence detected this.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 11:17 am    

so because of that they automatically HAVE to be weapons?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 12:17 pm    

That's what my educated guess would be. He knew that we were going to go to war against him, and so he shipped them out. Give me something else that he would have replaced his agents for.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 4:12 pm    

^ Well they have not found them. And we have been there for what, 2 years now "using all of our educated people, and all of our advanced satelites" But still nothing. So lets give it a rest until there is sufficient evidence to prove otherwise????

Come to think about it. If Saddam knew we were on him about the WMD's don't you think he would have been a little more discreet abouttransporting them somewhere else, knowing we were watching him.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 4:17 pm    

zero wrote:
^ Well they have not found them. And we have been there for what, 2 years now "using all of our educated people, and all of our advanced satelites" But still nothing. So lets give it a rest until there is sufficient evidence to prove otherwise????

Come to think about it. If Saddam knew we were on him about the WMD's don't you think he would have been a little more discreet abouttransporting them somewhere else, knowing we were watching him.


He was discrete, but we managed to find the footage. And there's no better way than replacing agents. I'm giving the intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt; that there was something there, and I still believe there was.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 4:20 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
zero wrote:
^ Well they have not found them. And we have been there for what, 2 years now "using all of our educated people, and all of our advanced satelites" But still nothing. So lets give it a rest until there is sufficient evidence to prove otherwise????

Come to think about it. If Saddam knew we were on him about the WMD's don't you think he would have been a little more discreet abouttransporting them somewhere else, knowing we were watching him.


He was discrete, but we managed to find the footage. And there's no better way than replacing agents. I'm giving the intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt; that there was something there, and I still believe there was.


Hey, that is your personal Opinion. Afterall, you are a Republican. So naturally, you would feel there is something there. I'm not trying to argue personal beliefs or opinions cause that will lead to no where.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 4:41 pm    

zero wrote:
Republican_Man wrote:
zero wrote:
^ Well they have not found them. And we have been there for what, 2 years now "using all of our educated people, and all of our advanced satelites" But still nothing. So lets give it a rest until there is sufficient evidence to prove otherwise????

Come to think about it. If Saddam knew we were on him about the WMD's don't you think he would have been a little more discreet abouttransporting them somewhere else, knowing we were watching him.


He was discrete, but we managed to find the footage. And there's no better way than replacing agents. I'm giving the intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt; that there was something there, and I still believe there was.


Hey, that is your personal Opinion. Afterall, you are a Republican. So naturally, you would feel there is something there. I'm not trying to argue personal beliefs or opinions cause that will lead to no where.


What? I'm a Republican, so I'm going to believe that there is still something there? No, I'm a loyal American who looks at more evidence presented than just a report or two. And btw, President Bush doesn't believe that there's more out there, or at least that's what he's showing, and yet he's a Republican



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 4:45 pm    

aaaaaaaaaanyway

Whatever you say homie.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostMon Apr 11, 2005 10:23 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:


What? I'm a Republican, so I'm going to believe that there is still something there? No, I'm a loyal American who looks at more evidence presented than just a report or two. And btw, President Bush doesn't believe that there's more out there, or at least that's what he's showing, and yet he's a Republican


There's an old saying; "There's a fine line between Patriotism and Nationalism."

How can you really say that though? Looks at all the evidence? the only evidence there is to fall back on is the sattelite imagery, and they dont even show what was being transported.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 12:31 am    

There is plenty of evidence to support both sides, and both sides seem to choose what they want to see, so I think unless one is capable of at least accepting that their opposing side might be correct, and is incapable of having just a small doubt that they themselves might be wrong, it is really pointless to discuss it.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 1:00 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
What? I'm a Republican, so I'm going to believe that there is still something there? No, I'm a loyal American who looks at more evidence presented than just a report or two. And btw, President Bush doesn't believe that there's more out there, or at least that's what he's showing, and yet he's a Republican



Like I said before. This war was a huge mistake. If Saddam was as big of a threat as the President made him out to be, I would agree with it. But we lost so many lives, on both ends... for nothing really.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 1:39 pm    

Could we have been wrong? Yes. But do we know that? No. And even if it were to turn out that we were wrong, it would still NOT have been a mistake.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 2:18 pm    

^PSSHHH, maybe in your eyes. But in mine.. we were DEAD WRONG! Obviously he was no threat to us with what the we were told we started the war for. But hey... we are America! Lets invade his country and take him out of power because well... we don't like the man, and neither does daddy.


Last edited by zero on Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:53 pm; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 2:40 pm    

He WAS a threat to us. That is UNDOUBTABLE. But the extent (as in WMDs or not) is under question, and questions are NOW valid.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 2:50 pm    

ok, whatever you say! You have your opinions and I have mine

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 2:50 pm    

I just wish we knew the truth. There's so much conspiracy around Iraq. People are saying it was all to do with oil

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
zero
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 4566
Location: Texas

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 2:52 pm    

^ That I agree with.

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 3:17 pm    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
There is plenty of evidence to support both sides, and both sides seem to choose what they want to see, so I think unless one is capable of at least accepting that their opposing side might be correct, and is incapable of having just a small doubt that they themselves might be wrong, it is really pointless to discuss it.


I agree with that. Both sides only believe that their information was correct and won't accept others. As you said I believe that there is flaws on both sides. It's why I'm not for or against the war, because there is no way to know the real information there was, being a normal member of the public. What I disagree with though is Sadam being a threat to the US.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 3:23 pm    

^He shot at our planes in the No Fly Zone, violating the cease-fire agreement that HE SIGNED. He called for attacks against the United States, and he's given money to terrorists who did Palistinian bombings against the Israel AND US civilians AND has supported al Quada and other terrorists in other ways. How does that NOT add up to a threat?


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
webtaz99
Commodore


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side

PostTue Apr 12, 2005 3:38 pm    

One thing is for sure. At one point Saddam DID have LOTS of WMDs. Ask the Kurds.


-------signature-------

"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com