Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:51 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Time Travel
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek Tech This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
~Voyager Fan~
Captain's Assistant


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Location: On board voyager assisting the captain

PostFri Jan 14, 2005 4:31 am    

no. i dont think its possible. 4 now (lol)


-------signature-------

Starfleet Command-
"You're not alone...."
Message in a Bottle

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
EnsignParis
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 257

PostSat Jan 22, 2005 11:04 pm    

[quote="Tyvek"]
Lt.BirdGod wrote:


Einsteins Theory of Relativity proved that nothing could travel faster than light in a vacuum, So FTL (Faster than Light Propulsion) is not possible, according to this theory. No matter the mass or energy(Because the ToR also stated that all matter has infinate energay but limited mass).


NOOOOOO!!! Mass does NOT BY ANY MEANS have infinate energy. If you looked at the equation e=mc^2 for two seconds, you'd realize that what you said was completely false.

for example:

e=1kg*(186000mi/s)^2

e=34596000000kg/mi/s

there you have it. 1 kg of mass has a finite (albeit absolutely massive) amount of energy.

(kg/mi/s = 1 unit of energy in this case)


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 12:15 pm    

Hence my theory of time travel

Alright now people have said that time travel is not possible. Yet it has already happened to some extent. In theory since I can predict some of the outcome of my future I can say that time travel is happening already. If drew a 1 block line and walk on it then I know that the future is me arriving at the end of the line. The future already exist since the past exist. I know that people would say the "future has not been written yet"

In theory if we go back to the past now the people in the past timeline could say the same thing if we ask them about the future. You see people the future has already been written it is merely being re-written over time. People have already been to the future, present, and past. My time travel theory can explain why some people in this world have vanished without a trace. I believe these people were erased from history because of time travel. I may sound crazy but this theory is not ignorable.

This would explain why the colony of roanoke vanished.

Past alters future.
Present alters future
Future can alter its future.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 3:04 pm    

borgslayer wrote:
Hence my theory of time travel

Alright now people have said that time travel is not possible. Yet it has already happened to some extent. In theory since I can predict some of the outcome of my future I can say that time travel is happening already. If drew a 1 block line and walk on it then I know that the future is me arriving at the end of the line. The future already exist since the past exist. I know that people would say the "future has not been written yet"


no, you take a guess at your future, but its not 100% sure your future will turn out the way you say it does. so no, you are not predicting anything. predicting means you actually KNOW whats going too happen.

borgslayer wrote:

In theory if we go back to the past now the people in the past timeline could say the same thing if we ask them about the future. You see people the future has already been written it is merely being re-written over time. People have already been to the future, present, and past. My time travel theory can explain why some people in this world have vanished without a trace. I believe these people were erased from history because of time travel. I may sound crazy but this theory is not ignorable.

This would explain why the colony of roanoke vanished.

Past alters future.
Present alters future
Future can alter its future.


Present alters future, that true. But past does not alter future, it alters present which in his turn alters the future. Your theory is Wrong and clearly flaw.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 4:20 pm    

People who have vanished could not have been 'erased' because if they were 'erased' we wouldn't remember them.

Although perhaps they have just travelled back or forward in time . . .

If one could know the exact position and velocity of every particle in the entire universe, then one could predict the future based on a set of probabilities. Because this obviously isn't possible though, humans can't predict the future (at least not with any degree of scientific accuracy) on a practical basis.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 5:51 pm    

Basically "anything that can happen will happen and has happened already"

So since we think time travel is possible then it is possible it has already happened since we know it can happen.

Lets just say Alternate Realities must exist in-order for all outcomes to be possible.

And again I say anything that can happen will happen and has happened already.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 6:09 pm    

borgslayer wrote:
Basically "anything that can happen will happen and has happened already"



Thats not a fact or anything, its just a theory.


Quote:
Lets just say Alternate Realities must exist in-order for all outcomes to be possible.



Alternate realities is a whole different subject.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 6:20 pm    

Quote:
Lets just say Alternate Realities must exist in-order for all outcomes to be possible.



Alternate realities is a whole different subject.[/quote]

Alternate Realities is related to time travel since traveling back to the past and changing an event can change the future and an Alternate Reality will happen.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostSat Mar 19, 2005 6:36 pm    

borgslayer wrote:


Alternate Realities is related to time travel since traveling back to the past and changing an event can change the future and an Alternate Reality will happen.



In theory, yes. but that would also totally contradict your own theory.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Five - seveN
Rear Admiral


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 3567
Location: Shadow Moon

PostSun Mar 20, 2005 1:32 pm    

Can someone explain what the colony of Raonoke is?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSun Mar 20, 2005 10:03 pm    

In the early 1600 a group of English settlers landed on the island of Roanoke which is east of the carolinas. Now some settlers headed back to England to bring some news about landing on the Americas. Anyways after the settlers from England went back to Roanoke they found no one left because mysteriously everyone in the small colonial island have vanished without a trace. Hence the story of Roanoke Island.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostMon Mar 21, 2005 12:02 am    

Sure, in the 17th centurey strange thing happened over night, people tough the world was flat for a long time.


-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
starnova
Commodore


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget

PostTue Mar 22, 2005 1:08 am    

ya back then a flat world made more sense then people living on a round sphere

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostTue Mar 22, 2005 9:00 am    

Yeah, so people vanishing was a better explanation then kidnap or Murder too.
Thousands of things could have happend to that colony that is explainable, and logical.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
starnova
Commodore


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget

PostTue Mar 22, 2005 6:37 pm    

maybe they had to evacuate the area because of some disaster

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Patrick
Commodore


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421

PostFri Apr 15, 2005 10:53 am    

I think that time travel is possible.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kylon
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Posts: 292
Location: In a distant galaxy far far away...

PostSat Apr 16, 2005 5:17 pm    Einstein was wrong...

Einstein was wrong, and is wrong today.

Einstein didn't believe in quantum mechanics, which according to that(and which has been proven) light CAN travel faster than the speed of light due to the uncertainity principle.

Einstein is oldschool, quantum mechanics is new school.

Quantum mechanics is right(which again this has been proven), and Einstein has been proven wrong.

If you want more info on faster than light stuff, you can look into super luminal tunneling, or if you want quantum entanglement.

Also, if anything did go into a black hole, the reason it is supposedly able to travel back in time, is because due to the intense gravity field, and the intense warping of space time, all time within a black hole becomes one, past present future(or this is at least to my understanding). Since black holes do evaporate over time(they emit mass via radiation), you would instantaneously(from your perspective, if you weren't crushed) be converted and emitted as energy.

Anyway, alot of it's theory, alot of it's fact, I'm kinda sick, so I need to hit the sack.



-------signature-------

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Albert Einstein

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostSat Apr 16, 2005 5:49 pm    

The only thing that can never ever travel faster than light is light itself. Just like when you are walking: you can't travel faster than you are walking, and similarly light cannot travel faster than it is travelling at any given time. If it is increasing speed, it still isn't travelling faster than the speed of light because obviously its new speed is also the new speed of light. (I'm arguing it as a matter of semantics here.)

Einstein was not wrong in any concrete sense. I think he just thought too big. You're right that quantum mechanics has exposed the inadequacy of relativity (for example, relativity cannot explain the pre-Big Bang universe). Also, Einstein was aware of the faults in his theory--it was one reason he tried adding in a "cosmological constant" to see if that would fix things.

His theories work fine over a large scale, but the smaller one thinks then the more obvious it becomes that relativity doesn't apply. Hence, quantum mechanics are used. Physicists are trying to figure out what the relationship between quantum mechanics (the small) and relativity (the big) are.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostSat Apr 16, 2005 6:06 pm    

he means that you can travel faster than the speed ofl ight without anything weird happening.

I agree with Kylon, einstein was wrong. I've been saying that for months but no one wants too believe me since i don't have a theory that proofs Einsteins theory is wrong.

Kyron did though.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
webtaz99
Commodore


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side

PostSun Apr 17, 2005 12:27 am    

The concept that nothing can travel faster than light is one of a set of assumptions Einstein used to formulate his theories, not a theory in itself. And while some of his conclusions may prove out wrong, others have been proven right.


-------signature-------

"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostTue Apr 19, 2005 4:31 pm    

Nostradamus is a time traveler or just a great forteller of the future? The answer lies in the future.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostSun Jun 26, 2005 8:49 am    

Well,... If you go into space, the time passes slower than on earth. So technically you'd be timetravelling then. There hasn't passed as much time for you as for the people on earth But that's the only form we know now.
I hope we discover someday how it's done, but I don't think it will ever happen. It's just too complicated.



-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostSun Jun 26, 2005 12:35 pm    

Birdy wrote:
I hope we discover someday how it's done, but I don't think it will ever happen. It's just too complicated.

Scientists actually have a pretty good idea of how one could accomplish time-travel (although, of course, that could all change if our current conception of the universe changes drastically again, which it quite possibly will). The major problem right now is not how one could travel in time, but how one will power it--any of the current scientifically plausible methods right now still require more power than we could ever produce at our current level of technology. We're talking wormhole-moving, antimatter-generating, gravity-creating power.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
lionhead
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 4020
Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)

PostSun Jul 03, 2005 3:47 am    

Birdy wrote:
Well,... If you go into space, the time passes slower than on earth. So technically you'd be timetravelling then. There hasn't passed as much time for you as for the people on earth But that's the only form we know now.



Thats not true. Thats a theory from a while back. before we realized that light travels at a certain speed and when something is far away we only see it when the light reaches us, which mean we see the past of that object (i'm talking about stars). But that isn't time travel.

Time travel isn't accompliced by speed.



-------signature-------

Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostSun Jul 03, 2005 4:16 am    

Hitchhiker wrote:
Scientists actually have a pretty good idea of how one could accomplish time-travel (although, of course, that could all change if our current conception of the universe changes drastically again, which it quite possibly will). The major problem right now is not how one could travel in time, but how one will power it--any of the current scientifically plausible methods right now still require more power than we could ever produce at our current level of technology. We're talking wormhole-moving, antimatter-generating, gravity-creating power.


Ah........ right! We'll, that sounds more probable to me! I hope we can timetravel one day. Although I don't think I'll be around then



-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com