| Author |
Message |
Defiant
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR
|
 Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:54 pm |
|
There you go again. Not saying anything except "I agree." Youre not adding anything meaningful to the debate. In fact, that could be considered spamming. Why do you bother posting the obvious? We know you agree.
|
|
|
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified
|
| Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:00 pm |
|
| Defiant wrote: | | There you go again. Not saying anything except "I agree." Youre not adding anything meaningful to the debate. In fact, that could be considered spamming. Why do you bother posting the obvious? We know you agree. |
Fine, fine. I won't state my agreement--I'll just state my disagreement there if I do disagree. But she is right, you know. If negotiations would bring ANYTHING at all, then fine. But they HAVE been giving "no's" and support to sworn enemies of this country, so yeah.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
voy416
Captain
Joined: 28 Oct 2001
Posts: 631
Location: Rock Bottom
|
| Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:18 pm |
|
I think they should just leave things as they are
-------signature-------
To Be Are Not To Be......Is That Really The
Question
|
|
|
Kyre
Commodore
Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 1263
|
| Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:25 am |
|
| Exalya wrote: | | Negotiation of what? They said no in the U.N., we asked them for help. No. They like the word a lot, unless they're talking to a certain dictator about bribes. If negotiations would bring anything, that'd be great. But most citizens can't do much about that. Boycotting is a personal choice of trying to make a difference when there's no other way. |
Ah, ok, I get it now; negotiation for America means that they get everything they want. I understand now, thanks.
|
|
|
Arellia
The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:21 am |
|
| Kyre wrote: | | Exalya wrote: | | Negotiation of what? They said no in the U.N., we asked them for help. No. They like the word a lot, unless they're talking to a certain dictator about bribes. If negotiations would bring anything, that'd be great. But most citizens can't do much about that. Boycotting is a personal choice of trying to make a difference when there's no other way. |
Ah, ok, I get it now; negotiation for America means that they get everything they want. I understand now, thanks. |
Hah! Okay, you take it that way. We don't need allys who have taken money from our enemies, anyway. I don't see anything to negotiate over. If they wanted to go against the war, then that's fine. Their own choice. But I would bet you just about anything that if France was invaded as it has been in the past and they called upon the U.S., we'd be there. I just bet.
|
|
|
Founder
Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
| Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:46 pm |
|
| Kyre wrote: | | Exalya wrote: | | Negotiation of what? They said no in the U.N., we asked them for help. No. They like the word a lot, unless they're talking to a certain dictator about bribes. If negotiations would bring anything, that'd be great. But most citizens can't do much about that. Boycotting is a personal choice of trying to make a difference when there's no other way. |
Ah, ok, I get it now; negotiation for America means that they get everything they want. I understand now, thanks. |
Yes EXACTLY. Now that you understand that, go get me a coke. NOW. 
|
|
|
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified
|
| Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:24 pm |
|
| Exalya wrote: | | Kyre wrote: | | Exalya wrote: | | Negotiation of what? They said no in the U.N., we asked them for help. No. They like the word a lot, unless they're talking to a certain dictator about bribes. If negotiations would bring anything, that'd be great. But most citizens can't do much about that. Boycotting is a personal choice of trying to make a difference when there's no other way. |
Ah, ok, I get it now; negotiation for America means that they get everything they want. I understand now, thanks. |
Hah! Okay, you take it that way. We don't need allys who have taken money from our enemies, anyway. I don't see anything to negotiate over. If they wanted to go against the war, then that's fine. Their own choice. But I would bet you just about anything that if France was invaded as it has been in the past and they called upon the U.S., we'd be there. I just bet. |
Exactly! I'll get you stats according to the latest AP polls. Something like 80% of Canadians have a favorable rating of us, 41% of French do, with 52% or so not, 41% German and 53% not, and only 35% of Spanish have a favorable rating about us.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Five - seveN
Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 3567
Location: Shadow Moon
|
| Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:50 am |
|
Which means you should do something about that, instead of boycotting them? 
|
|
|
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified
|
| Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:05 pm |
|
| Five - seveN wrote: | | Which means you should do something about that, instead of boycotting them? |
The low favorability ratings are NOT the reason that I'm boycotting France. The government has screwed us to much, and it is my honest opinion that Chirac is an ENEMY of this country. However, the other countries have not acted against us as much, therefore France is the target for the boycott. Others are fine enough not to.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
