Author |
Message |
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:02 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | Are you telling me that somewhere in the World people believe the terorist to be good? Murdering children turn into a good thing?
Besides the terrorists POV. |
Everything has different angles, different facets. Believing, "America good, terrorists bad" is a rather one-sided, monochrome view of the situation. Similarly, saying that "America bad, terrorists good" is also one-sided and monochrome.
I do not condone the actions of terrorists, nor do I think we should stop fighting them. Yes, some of them are religious fanatics bent on destruction of infidels.
But some of them murder children because they believe it is the right thing to do--because it shows that they will oppose what they view as the 'harmful U.S. presence.'
By simply stating that the terrorists are 'evil' rather than attempting to understand and reconcile their views, we are just fueling the deeper divide between cultures and ideas. Seek a mutual understanding.
The above paragraph doesn't mean, "Throw down your weapons and ask the terrorists to stop their attacks." It means simply that obviously there are people--some of which are religious fanatics, some who are not--who are unhappy with the U.S.' presence in the Middle East. You can't satisfy everyone, but when there is this level of violence, obviously the root issues, not the violence itself, need to be addressed.
What the U.S. is doing is equivalent to treating typhoid fever with aspirin. They are addressing the violence of terrorists acts, not the cause of terrorism itself.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:04 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | Are you telling me that somewhere in the World people believe the terorist to be good? Murdering children turn into a good thing?
Besides the terrorists POV. |
EXACTLY.
Founder wrote: | What? WTF are you talking about? Where did I contradict myself? |
Agreed. You didn't.
And keep drinking your kool-aide, Tach. Mutters: Can't even tell that these people are evil...
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Defiant Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001 Posts: 15946 Location: Oregon City, OR
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:07 pm |
|
You contradict yourself because you at the same time say that Hussein supports terrorism, and that no one except terrorists think terrorism is good.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:11 pm |
|
Well I agree HH. This isn't the movies. The terrorists aren't inherently evil. They aren't bad guys bent on world domination. Their acts are evil. That was my point about India/Britain and KKK/Civil rights movements. Although Defiant decided to make a joke and others argued about the vilatity of the KKK's fall. The poin is, is that peaceful protesting wil lget the US's attention alot more than terrorist attacks will.
Defiant? That made no sense. If you support it what does that make you?
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:13 pm |
|
Republican_Man wrote: | And keep drinking your kool-aide, Tach. Mutters: Can't even tell that these people are evil... |
Evil is subjective. I am not as absolutist in my judgment, and seldom do I label such things in the extreme of 'good' and 'evil'.
I could easily see myself in their shoes. What if North America was suddenly invaded by a foreign theocracy, and I felt my liberties and beliefs were threatened? I can see myself rationalizing several despicable acts, I recognize what a human being is capable of when they feel that their way of life is threatened by an external source--one that they can hate, and resent, and demonize as much as they like because it represents what they fear.
You started a Resistance RPG, RM. Does that make our characters terrorists who are therefore 'evil'? Probably not in the eyes of the characters. They can rationalize what they do because, in all likelihood, they see the invading force as evil.
We are all shaped by our experiences. The terrorists of which you speak, these religious fanatics--they are as much victims of circumstance as we are of them. They have grown up throughout their lives, indoctrinated by anti-American sentiments and propaganda. If they had grown up the in U.S., they might not be terrorists. If I had grown up saturated by anti-American propaganda, then I might well become a terrorist. Why condemn these people for an accident of birthplace?
Obviously we can't say, "Yeah, it's okay to go on hating us." But if terrorists think the U.S. is evil, and the U.S. thinks terrorists are evil . . . my my, it seems like we've got a nice little mirror. Just calling a terrorist evil doesn't do anything. They are only evil through circumstance: society happens to rule out murder as an acceptable activity. Change the circumstance, change the evil.
And tea is much better than koolaid--less sugar, and it doesn't make me as hyper
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:16 pm |
|
If someone invaded North America and you joined a resistance HH, Im sure we would all accept certain levels of survivals. I don't think we would condone chopping innocent people's heads off. Nor blowing ourselves up while killing innocents.
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:18 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | If someone invaded North America and you joined a resistance HH, Im sure we would all accept certain levels of survivals. I don't think we would condone chopping innocent people's heads off. Nor blowing ourselves up while killing innocents. |
You're right, but only because I forgot that I was raised in a 'civilized' Western society.
However, if I were raised in the Middle East and I had bad experiences with the U.S., I could see myself as a terrorist. I'm only a pacifist because of the way I've been raised, and the type of culture I've been exposed to as a Canadian--such experiences have encouraged me to personally form the opinion that pacifism is the best ethical philosophy. We are only the sum of our experiences, after all . . . if those experiences are all bad, then what does that make the person?
Er . . . I need to get another season of DS9 DVDs before I go crazy and philosophical watching Season 1 over--and over--and over.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:22 pm |
|
I understand what your saying. This is whats right to them. They turned evil though when they put crying people in front of a webcam and slowly cut their heads off with a dull blade. When they condoneds the hijacking of four planes and rammed them into buildings. They murdered innocents and IMO thats EVIL.
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:28 pm |
|
Yes, I might call those acts evil, but I'll admit that I'm afraid to label anything evil. The adjective is very strong, and very potent . . . I prefer to use an adjective such as unspeakably cruel or incredulously malicious.
But it's all semantics. . . . no matter to what degree you label it, the acts of terrorism we've seen cannot be condoned.
Like I've said however, many of these terrorists, including the fanatics, perceive the U.S. as a threat. Although it is impossible to please or persuade everyone, the U.S. is ultimately responsible for how the U.S. wants to portray itself. I'm sure it's not the U.S.' intention to seem imperialistic--but nevertheless that is how they seem, because of their actions, because the people who see these actions were not raised to think like an American and therefore do not understand in the way an American does.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:55 pm |
|
Defiant wrote: | You contradict yourself because you at the same time say that Hussein supports terrorism, and that no one except terrorists think terrorism is good. |
If you support terrorists, then you are a terrorist yourself.
Founder wrote: | Well I agree HH. This isn't the movies. The terrorists aren't inherently evil. They aren't bad guys bent on world domination. Their acts are evil. That was my point about India/Britain and KKK/Civil rights movements. Although Defiant decided to make a joke and others argued about the vilatity of the KKK's fall. The poin is, is that peaceful protesting wil lget the US's attention alot more than terrorist attacks will.
Defiant? That made no sense. If you support it what does that make you? |
Right.
Founder wrote: | If someone invaded North America and you joined a resistance HH, Im sure we would all accept certain levels of survivals. I don't think we would condone chopping innocent people's heads off. Nor blowing ourselves up while killing innocents. |
EXACTLY.
Founder wrote: | I understand what your saying. This is whats right to them. They turned evil though when they put crying people in front of a webcam and slowly cut their heads off with a dull blade. When they condoneds the hijacking of four planes and rammed them into buildings. They murdered innocents and IMO thats EVIL. |
EXACTLY. There is NO EXCUSE for that! If you can't see that that's evil, Tach, then you are as blind as a bat. You are just ridiculous, Tach. Ridiculous. Evil is the PERFECT and ONLY word to describe these people!
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Defiant Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001 Posts: 15946 Location: Oregon City, OR
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:21 am |
|
Republican_Man wrote: | Defiant wrote: | You contradict yourself because you at the same time say that Hussein supports terrorism, and that no one except terrorists think terrorism is good. |
If you support terrorists, then you are a terrorist yourself. |
*beep* you RM. That was 100% uncalled for and you know it.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:39 am |
|
Defiant wrote: | Republican_Man wrote: | Defiant wrote: | You contradict yourself because you at the same time say that Hussein supports terrorism, and that no one except terrorists think terrorism is good. |
If you support terrorists, then you are a terrorist yourself. |
*beep* you RM. That was 100% uncalled for and you know it. |
That was uncalled for. What? Supporting terrorists is ok to you? Firs the racsict comment, where NO where in my post did I say you were racist, but you bitch that I did. RM just stated the obvious. We aren't calling anyone here terrorist. I understand what HH is saying. In fact I thought of it before. They are not inherently evil. No one really is. Acts define people. They murder innocents. Plain and simple. If anyone here says thats ok to do, then you have problems.
|
|
|
Defiant Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001 Posts: 15946 Location: Oregon City, OR
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:50 am |
|
So today you called me a racist, RM called me a terrorist sympathizer, and now, theres nothing wrong with it? Your style of arguing needs serious work. Attacking the opposition is not a valid strategy.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:51 am |
|
Stop lieing. I never called you a rascist. What the hell is your problem? He didn't call you a terrorist sympathizer either.
|
|
|
Defiant Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001 Posts: 15946 Location: Oregon City, OR
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:16 am |
|
Except for where he did. But fine, let everyone else decide. Im leaving. You have fun with your attacking ways.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 5:58 am |
|
To carrect the person above me, my username is not kmma no more. can u read? Not trying to be mean or anything. I don't want to be called kmma anymore thats why I ask to change my username. My name is Deb.
back on Topic anyway.
U people are worrying about the world around ya and not worrying about your own selves. Who cares anymore about the news and whats going on every where else? I am worried what going on right here for right now cause this subject and all the others topics just make people fight over a topic. Silly in my opinion.
|
|
|
Jeremy J's Guy
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 Posts: 7823 Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:48 am |
|
Ok, until that last little bit I was actually amazed! You had gone through 4 pages mostly without attacking each other, So can you please make sure you don't start it again, thanks.
I believe that the actions of these terrorists are evil, but I also believe that there is a number of reasons that people have resorted to these tactics. No matter what people say here, America is perceved as being a country that takes over others. I have seen that generally with the public opinion here, and my dad who has been to places such as Pakistan has also seen it. Along with this is the opinion that it is a religious war. With the combination of these to things there is problems created.
I'll post more later, getting chucked off now.
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:24 am |
|
Rbgirl wrote: | U people are worrying about the world around ya and not worrying about your own selves. Who cares anymore about the news and whats going on every where else? I am worried what going on right here for right now cause this subject and all the others topics just make people fight over a topic. Silly in my opinion. |
Well, the major reason I love these debates is because they are esoteric and abstract, more about concepts and ideas than actual facts. It's fun.
However, I'm sensing a little apathy here . . . we should care. You are not in a closed system, you are part of a global community, and everything that the other 6 billion people on this planet do will affect you in some way. Isolation, unfortunately, is not possible in this technocracy that we've constructed. As much as I'd love to be a hermit, eventually outside events will affect me. I consider myself pretty ignorant (ask me to name a current pop star--no name will come to mind) but my ignorance through that is merely because of my anti-socialness, not apathy.
|
|
|
Jeremy J's Guy
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 Posts: 7823 Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:17 am |
|
Carrying on from where I left off, and this first bit seems to be repeating a bit of what HH just said, the reality is that America in some countries isn't liked. I agree that something should be done about terrorists, but probably not in the way that it is being combated at the moment. That way will only increase them. I hate the idea of leaving some dictators in power, but in some ways it will end up better probably. At the moment my life is pretty messed up, so I'm not certain on these views, but it's mostly what I feel at the moment.
Founder wrote: | Are you telling me that somewhere in the World people believe the terorist to be good? Murdering children turn into a good thing?
Besides the terrorists POV. |
The problem is the opposite could also be applied, although I agree - name the people that agree that killing children is wrong, apart from people that have been raised that way.
And sometimes violence does win through. Gandi and the civil rights movements won peacefully, but would America have got her freedom if there hadn't been a war?
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:10 pm |
|
RM? No one is listening to what we are saying. HH and Jeremy. You two make GREAT posts. Although I've said the same answers to them both a trillion times. I'll pu it in bold and maybe ya'll will notice my answers this time.
Jeremy wrote: | I believe that the actions of these terrorists are evil, but I also believe that there is a number of reasons that people have resorted to these tactics. No matter what people say here, America is perceved as being a country that takes over others. I have seen that generally with the public opinion here, and my dad who has been to places such as Pakistan has also seen it. Along with this is the opinion that it is a religious war. With the combination of these to things there is problems created. |
You are right in the fact that they feel they are justified in their murders. Just like you said though is that their actions are evil. No matter what has happened when you resort to killing innocents to "prove your point", then you must be stopped. Im well aware of how American is percieved in the World. I have many foreign friends and watched the documetary: Hating America. MANY contries percieve us as a totalitarian government pushing our influence onto the World. Which is open for debate. Although I won't argue that the US has done terrible things in the World. But I will never justify the killing of all those INNOCENTS on 9/11. This is a Religious War in a sense. Both sides aren't fighting for Religious purposes. You might say "But Bush said the word Crusade!!!!!!" So the f**k what? You all read into it too deeply. Yes, America did make some claims about Religion from this war. Both sides have. The thing is, is that America isn't fighting to prove who has the "cooler" Religion. Nor do I think the Terrorists are fighting for that. Although to them Religion is a HUGE factor. Im not saying thats bad im just trying to clarify the Religious thing. If you believe that well then....you're wrong.
Hitchhiker wrote: | However, I'm sensing a little apathy here . . . we should care. You are not in a closed system, you are part of a global community, and everything that the other 6 billion people on this planet do will affect you in some way. Isolation, unfortunately, is not possible in this technocracy that we've constructed. As much as I'd love to be a hermit, eventually outside events will affect me. I consider myself pretty ignorant (ask me to name a current pop star--no name will come to mind) but my ignorance through that is merely because of my anti-socialness, not apathy. |
We should care about the events of the World. The reason we were sucked into the War was because we didn't care. Your right. We can no longer hide within the confines of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Not anymore. We're knee deep in the World events and have to stay. Thats why when all these morons tell us to leave Iraq, I get annoyed. Because its such a stupid thing to say. Besides like you said, we shouldn't be isolated even despite these events. We are part of the World.
Jeremy wrote: | Carrying on from where I left off, and this first bit seems to be repeating a bit of what HH just said, the reality is that America in some countries isn't liked. I agree that something should be done about terrorists, but probably not in the way that it is being combated at the moment. That way will only increase them. I hate the idea of leaving some dictators in power, but in some ways it will end up better probably. At the moment my life is pretty messed up, so I'm not certain on these views, but it's mostly what I feel at the moment. |
I understand that reality. BOTH me and RM agree that America is hated across the World. We never once disputed that. Not in the way its being done? How are we to combat them? Please don't say negotation. They murdered people left and right. Tons of civilians. People not even involved in this messed up war. They don't deserve peaceful negotiations. We will not reward them with talks of compramise. That shows others that hates us, that they can get away with mass murder and we wil settle.
Leaving dictators in power is better? Wow I can tell you don't live in a country led by a Dictator. Before you say "And you do?". Im Cuban. So yes I do know. I personally live in America but half of my family does not. Leaving Saddam in power after the s**t he did is wrong. If you were suffering over there under his rule you wouldn't be here saying its ok to leave him in power. Im sorry but what your saying is a copout. Basically give up mentality. "Its easier for us to, if a Dictator is in power. So depsite the countless lives taken. We should allow it. Its more convenient."
Jeremy wrote: | The problem is the opposite could also be applied, although I agree - name the people that agree that killing children is wrong, apart from people that have been raised that way.
And sometimes violence does win through. Gandi and the civil rights movements won peacefully, but would America have got her freedom if there hadn't been a war? |
I seriously doubt they are raised to not mind killing children. Especially with Islam being a Religion of peace.
I already made a post about the American Revolution. Im not saying their struggle is evil. Thier actions are evil. I don't think America killed innocents as blantly as these terrorists are killing them. Its not the same.
This has become a blurred war. Because in essence both sides are right. The latest Bin Laden tape has Bin Laden taking the blame for 9/11. He even cites why he did it. Wasn't it something alone the lines of "I wanted America to know what its like to lost innocent civilians. Like innocents in Palestine and Lebanon who are killed by Americans and Jews everyday." Not a direct quote obviously but something like that. He did 9/11 because he was striking back, not vice versa. It came at a shock to me. Because it was easier to believe that they were evil and thats that. He wasn't even attacking us because he simply hated America. He had a reason. BUT the people who died on 9/11 had nothing to do with Palestine and Lebanon. It was not right. It isn't right to rob families of loved ones by cutting their heads off on tov. By getting sick pleasure by watching them sob through a letter. Now the terrorist have become as "Evil as America" through their actions. They have become hypocrites. No matter what they say now, it won't matter. All respect was lost when they MURDERED innocent civilians.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:22 pm |
|
Defiant wrote: | So today you called me a racist, RM called me a terrorist sympathizer, and now, theres nothing wrong with it? Your style of arguing needs serious work. Attacking the opposition is not a valid strategy. |
1. Founder did NOT call you a racist.
2. I NEVER called you a "terrorist sympathizer." Stop lieing, like Founder says. See the truth.
Founder wrote: | RM? No one is listening to what we are saying. HH and Jeremy. You two make GREAT posts. Although I've said the same answers to them both a trillion times. I'll pu it in bold and maybe ya'll will notice my answers this time.
Jeremy wrote: | I believe that the actions of these terrorists are evil, but I also believe that there is a number of reasons that people have resorted to these tactics. No matter what people say here, America is perceved as being a country that takes over others. I have seen that generally with the public opinion here, and my dad who has been to places such as Pakistan has also seen it. Along with this is the opinion that it is a religious war. With the combination of these to things there is problems created. |
You are right in the fact that they feel they are justified in their murders. Just like you said though is that their actions are evil. No matter what has happened when you resort to killing innocents to "prove your point", then you must be stopped. Im well aware of how American is percieved in the World. I have many foreign friends and watched the documetary: Hating America. MANY contries percieve us as a totalitarian government pushing our influence onto the World. Which is open for debate. Although I won't argue that the US has done terrible things in the World. But I will never justify the killing of all those INNOCENTS on 9/11. This is a Religious War in a sense. Both sides aren't fighting for Religious purposes. You might say "But Bush said the word Crusade!!!!!!" So the f**k what? You all read into it too deeply. Yes, America did make some claims about Religion from this war. Both sides have. The thing is, is that America isn't fighting to prove who has the "cooler" Religion. Nor do I think the Terrorists are fighting for that. Although to them Religion is a HUGE factor. Im not saying thats bad im just trying to clarify the Religious thing. If you believe that well then....you're wrong.
Good points.
Hitchhiker wrote: | However, I'm sensing a little apathy here . . . we should care. You are not in a closed system, you are part of a global community, and everything that the other 6 billion people on this planet do will affect you in some way. Isolation, unfortunately, is not possible in this technocracy that we've constructed. As much as I'd love to be a hermit, eventually outside events will affect me. I consider myself pretty ignorant (ask me to name a current pop star--no name will come to mind) but my ignorance through that is merely because of my anti-socialness, not apathy. |
We should care about the events of the World. The reason we were sucked into the War was because we didn't care. Your right. We can no longer hide within the confines of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Not anymore. We're knee deep in the World events and have to stay. Thats why when all these morons tell us to leave Iraq, I get annoyed. Because its such a stupid thing to say. Besides like you said, we shouldn't be isolated even despite these events. We are part of the World.
Right on.
Jeremy wrote: | Carrying on from where I left off, and this first bit seems to be repeating a bit of what HH just said, the reality is that America in some countries isn't liked. I agree that something should be done about terrorists, but probably not in the way that it is being combated at the moment. That way will only increase them. I hate the idea of leaving some dictators in power, but in some ways it will end up better probably. At the moment my life is pretty messed up, so I'm not certain on these views, but it's mostly what I feel at the moment. |
I understand that reality. BOTH me and RM agree that America is hated across the World. We never once disputed that. Not in the way its being done? How are we to combat them? Please don't say negotation. They murdered people left and right. Tons of civilians. People not even involved in this messed up war. They don't deserve peaceful negotiations. We will not reward them with talks of compramise. That shows others that hates us, that they can get away with mass murder and we wil settle.
Leaving dictators in power is better? Wow I can tell you don't live in a country led by a Dictator. Before you say "And you do?". Im Cuban. So yes I do know. I personally live in America but half of my family does not. Leaving Saddam in power after the s**t he did is wrong. If you were suffering over there under his rule you wouldn't be here saying its ok to leave him in power. Im sorry but what your saying is a copout. Basically give up mentality. "Its easier for us to, if a Dictator is in power. So depsite the countless lives taken. We should allow it. Its more convenient."
Jeremy wrote: | The problem is the opposite could also be applied, although I agree - name the people that agree that killing children is wrong, apart from people that have been raised that way.
And sometimes violence does win through. Gandi and the civil rights movements won peacefully, but would America have got her freedom if there hadn't been a war? |
I seriously doubt they are raised to not mind killing children. Especially with Islam being a Religion of peace.
I already made a post about the American Revolution. Im not saying their struggle is evil. Thier actions are evil. I don't think America killed innocents as blantly as these terrorists are killing them. Its not the same.
This has become a blurred war. Because in essence both sides are right. The latest Bin Laden tape has Bin Laden taking the blame for 9/11. He even cites why he did it. Wasn't it something alone the lines of "I wanted America to know what its like to lost innocent civilians. Like innocents in Palestine and Lebanon who are killed by Americans and Jews everyday." Not a direct quote obviously but something like that. He did 9/11 because he was striking back, not vice versa. It came at a shock to me. Because it was easier to believe that they were evil and thats that. He wasn't even attacking us because he simply hated America. He had a reason. BUT the people who died on 9/11 had nothing to do with Palestine and Lebanon. It was not right. It isn't right to rob families of loved ones by cutting their heads off on tov. By getting sick pleasure by watching them sob through a letter. Now the terrorist have become as "Evil as America" through their actions. They have become hypocrites. No matter what they say now, it won't matter. All respect was lost when they MURDERED innocent civilians. |
EXACTLY.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Jeremy J's Guy
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 Posts: 7823 Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:39 pm |
|
You're right about me not living in a country ruled by a dictator. There are things that unless I did I can never understand, so I won't pretend to. I believe that a dictor should be overthrown, but the way I was looking at it was from a global perspective, and with America being hated. I think America should probably have highly trained squads that can go in, kill the leaders (terrorist or dictators) and then get out. This will be a lot more difficult that it is to say, but I think it would be better than invading countries to gt rid of them. I'm not saying this was the only reason for the Iraq war, but it's more general. The problem would be that the people who take the old leaders place could be worse.
Not all of them are raised to not mind killing children, but some are. There are kids of 5 that are trained to kill using guns and so on in some areas. I find it totally sick. And I agree that for some the struggle is not evil, but the methods are, but some people who claim to be muslims or the like are out for their own gain, and use religion to get supporters. Those people I find are just evil.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:41 pm |
|
Jeremy wrote: | You're right about me not living in a country ruled by a dictator. There are things that unless I did I can never understand, so I won't pretend to. I believe that a dictor should be overthrown, but the way I was looking at it was from a global perspective, and with America being hated. I think America should probably have highly trained squads that can go in, kill the leaders (terrorist or dictators) and then get out. This will be a lot more difficult that it is to say, but I think it would be better than invading countries to gt rid of them. I'm not saying this was the only reason for the Iraq war, but it's more general. The problem would be that the people who take the old leaders place could be worse.
The problem with that is, if we don't bring political stability then a new communist/dictator will take over. Or some kinda of evil regime. In this case if we left. Terrorist would take over and murder the Iraqis who supported us. We can't just go in, shoot a guy, and leave the crap for them.
Not all of them are raised to not mind killing children, but some are. There are kids of 5 that are trained to kill using guns and so on in some areas. I find it totally sick. And I agree that for some the struggle is not evil, but the methods are, but some people who claim to be muslims or the like are out for their own gain, and use religion to get supporters. Those people I find are just evil. |
Agreed. Well said.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:50 pm |
|
Founder wrote: | Jeremy wrote: | You're right about me not living in a country ruled by a dictator. There are things that unless I did I can never understand, so I won't pretend to. I believe that a dictor should be overthrown, but the way I was looking at it was from a global perspective, and with America being hated. I think America should probably have highly trained squads that can go in, kill the leaders (terrorist or dictators) and then get out. This will be a lot more difficult that it is to say, but I think it would be better than invading countries to gt rid of them. I'm not saying this was the only reason for the Iraq war, but it's more general. The problem would be that the people who take the old leaders place could be worse.
The problem with that is, if we don't bring political stability then a new communist/dictator will take over. Or some kinda of evil regime. In this case if we left. Terrorist would take over and murder the Iraqis who supported us. We can't just go in, shoot a guy, and leave the crap for them.
Not all of them are raised to not mind killing children, but some are. There are kids of 5 that are trained to kill using guns and so on in some areas. I find it totally sick. And I agree that for some the struggle is not evil, but the methods are, but some people who claim to be muslims or the like are out for their own gain, and use religion to get supporters. Those people I find are just evil. |
Agreed. Well said. |
I agree with that agreement.
And we can't forget what Saddam's evil regime did, anyways
...Let's read a quick 5-minute freewrite from my English class today...
My 5-minute freewrite wrote: | "Violence and bloodshed can never have morally good results." This statement instantly applies to today's world--specifically with the War in Iraq, and that alone proves this satement false. Sure, the War in Iraq was started because of a threat that most of the world, including the US, UK, Australia, France, Russia, Germany, Jordan, Egypt, and the UN, testified to--that being eapons of Mass Destruction--but there is more to it than that. That being the freedom and liberty of an oppressed people. Saddam, his sons, and his regime as a whole carried out torture chambers, where parents and children were tortured infront of each other aline, plastic body shredders, child prisons, and rape rooms, as well as the brutal whippings and cutting of of fingers, tongues, and heads of innocents; the throwing of people off of buidlings, including innocents; and the bombin, torture, and attempted genocide and the mass graves of a single group, being the Iraq Kurds. Because of the War in Iraq there no longer are rape rooms and torture chambers. The oppresive regime is no more, and if those are not good moral results, then I don't know what is. |
Just a little freewrite from earlier, but the truth. Imperialism for freeing these people and stopping this? I don't think so. But then again, these are things that Defiant's fellow Libs--the far-leftwingers--forget, or at least try to forget or act like they never happened.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:56 pm |
|
Excellant find RM. Agreed 100%. Don't show anyone who opposes the war that. They will simply said its made up. They will never accept the truth. Reasons why I feared John Kerry for President.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|