Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:22 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Union Vs Confederacy
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Which side in the US Civil War Was right?
The Union
76%
 76%  [ 26 ]
The Confederacy
23%
 23%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 34

Author Message
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 4:21 am    

wow dappet your a real genius on this arent you?
You see you cant just blame the south because the north had slaves too... YES its true.. dont bs ur way out of it ya yankees.. the fact is almost every country has gone through a time when slavery was allowed. And most countries have slavery outlawed.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 8:31 am    

And I beleive the Emancipation Proclamation only freed the southern slaves, not the northern ones. I will have to double check that though...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
D_Star
Lieutenant


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 151

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 8:56 am    

No

There were no northern slaves in 1863


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 1:22 pm    

Captain Dappet wrote:
As I said before, the blacks didn't get their rights and freedoms until the 1960's. Even after the war, slave labour was still used because of one main reason; they created a nice tasty economical income.
With this post I was referring to the entire nation, not just the South.

And it makes no sense calling em a yankee, if thats what you did, as I'm not even American.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 6:02 pm    

Just end this debate. The Confederacy was wrong and bad, and lost the war. The Union was good and rightous and won the war. There is no point in continuing this.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 6:07 pm    

That's pretty silly. Why even bother coming to WN with that attitude?


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 6:28 pm    

You know that technically the Confederacy was being occupied by a foreign force, they had the right to attack the Union. They seceded and after asking for the Union to abondon it's forts in the south, they refused, so technically they were only fighting to defend their land, which the Union army, a "foreign nation's army" refused to leave.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 6:32 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
That's pretty silly. Why even bother coming to WN with that attitude?


But this is the debate The Civil War!



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostWed Dec 01, 2004 8:44 pm    

I don't see how saying that you're right and there wrong is much of a debate,


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostFri Dec 03, 2004 10:37 am    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
You know that technically the Confederacy was being occupied by a foreign force, they had the right to attack the Union. They seceded and after asking for the Union to abondon it's forts in the south, they refused, so technically they were only fighting to defend their land, which the Union army, a "foreign nation's army" refused to leave.


Thank you. Thats what I've been saying all along the South was fighting for States rights... They had the right to fight just as England did when Nazi Germany was invading.

And please don't post here saying that the north was right the south was wrong and tell us to end our debate.
Thanks


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
D_Star
Lieutenant


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 151

PostSat Dec 04, 2004 1:27 am    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
You know that technically the Confederacy was being occupied by a foreign force, they had the right to attack the Union. They seceded and after asking for the Union to abondon it's forts in the south, they refused, so technically they were only fighting to defend their land, which the Union army, a "foreign nation's army" refused to leave.


it was not a foreign force cause the states were a part of the US.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostSat Dec 04, 2004 10:32 am    

No, technically they weren't. The Confederate States of America was independent completely from the Union, and thus, not part of the United States of America.

I think that's what I read, at least.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
D_Star
Lieutenant


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 151

PostSat Dec 04, 2004 2:18 pm    

But the North didnt recognize their sucession

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostSat Dec 04, 2004 5:20 pm    

Well that is not the south's problem is it?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 6:56 am    

It doesnt matter if the union recognized it or not. There are many nations now that are "independnt" that the USA doesnt recognize.

And the SOUTH had no problem.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
D_Star
Lieutenant


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 151

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 10:00 am    

OK if you think the world would have been a better place with the South having been brooken up from the USA then so be it. But you are living in a dream world.

Do you think the US after having been broken up -would have come to the aid of Europe in WW1 & WW2?

What if the US had not come to the aid of Europe in either time?

Don't you think we all would be speaking german now? Do you think we would all be spending currency with Hitler's face on it? Sieg Heil? Sperchen zie Deutch?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 12:33 pm    

hah. Just, hah.

Do you really think that Europe would've accepted being conquered by Hitler and the Germans? If so, then I'm sorry to burst your bubble; I don't think we would.

And what's more, the Americans weren't the only ones that fought Hitler back. The Soviet Red Army was on the Eastern side, the British on the West, and in Africa. And then there was the French resistance, and the resistance groups in the Former Yugoslavia, inspired and aided by the Red Army, and more factors.

I don't think it would've been possible for Hitler to conquer the world, as was his plan, with or without American help.

But that's besides the point.

If the Confederacy had won, or remained to be independent, sure, slavery would've been used for a longer time, and America would not be as powerful and influential as it is, possibly.

Still, I stand my ground; neither side of the American Civil War was "right".


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
D_Star
Lieutenant


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 151

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 3:31 pm    

OK I am aware of the Red army but had it not been for America and her 16 Million soldiers and sailors who fought in the big one, Hitler would have conquered all. You cant deny that. If you really think Britain would have held back the Germans from 1940 without ANY help from the US you are living in a dreamworld.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 5:17 pm    

Who's the one living in a dream world anyway?

That the Brits could not have held the Germans back, that might true, considering the loans they took from the U.S. But the British are not people who'd just accept being German. There would be such a HUGE resistance.

The Norweigians resisted.

The Yugoslavians resisted, and broke free, on their own.

The Red Army was taking ground even before the invasion of Normandie.

Besides, it wasn't the U.S' intention to fight anyway. They joined the war, because they were attacked at Pearl Harbour.

I will not deny that American troops brought Hitler to an end much faster, and for that I am grateful. But Europe would never accept being Nazi. The Soviet Union wouldn't accept fascists at their doorstep, and none of the conquered nations, like Poland and Czechoslovakia, for instance, would give up without a fight.

World Domination is impossible, my friend. Hitler could never have conquered the World.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 5:56 pm    

Captain Dappet wrote:
World Domination is impossible, my friend.

Oh, I wouldn't say it's impossible. But the only way to do it is to seize control without letting anyone realize what you're doing.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostMon Dec 06, 2004 11:56 pm    

I think it is more likely that we would be talking Russian than German had the US not assisted in WW2.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostTue Dec 07, 2004 11:15 am    

They took over East Germany, didnt they? They didnt speak Russian in the D.D.R, so, no. I don't think we'd be speaking Russian.

Besides, once again, people wouldn't accept being Russian, either. It's all the same. Russians, Germans, and even before that, French...People wouldn't accept it.

Hitchhiker: That's actually a very interesting thought, that might very well be in progress right now. You never know.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostTue Dec 07, 2004 3:45 pm    

Alrighty, we're supposed to be talking about the Civil War here, not WW2. Thanks.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostFri Jan 21, 2005 6:47 pm    

thanks IIM I been gone a bit but back now...Ok first of all you guys dont know the south very well. There are plenty of people with 6 or more guns in there house so if Hitler tried to take over the CSA we would stand a better chance than the USA. i refer you to http://www.damnedsquirrel.org/texas

and thats just about TEXAS as the Republic of Texas. The rest of the south would just add to the CSA's economy.

I also direct your attention to http://www.damnedsquirrel.org/rebel


Last edited by CaptianCircuitGod on Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:53 pm; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Toad
Chief of Security


Joined: 28 Aug 2003
Posts: 936
Location: The Great Plains

PostSat Jan 22, 2005 12:35 pm    

My brother is an expert on the American Civil War. I'll let him know and maybe he'll get on here and discuss it. You should see all the books he has on the subject! He's a machine!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com