Should the words "UNDER GOD" be stripped from the Pledge of Allegance? |
Yes |
|
46% |
[ 15 ] |
No |
|
31% |
[ 10 ] |
No; to do so would be to give into the Secularists |
|
21% |
[ 7 ] |
|
Total Votes : 32 |
|
Author |
Message |
Kate Janeway Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 Posts: 4120 Location: Texas
|
Fri Apr 16, 2004 8:11 pm |
|
^^It doesn't really bother me either, but for others, it comes dangerously close to forcing the Christian religion down our throats. <-- 'Our' meaning everyone who says the pledge.
-------signature-------
I like children. If they're properly cooked.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:55 pm |
|
In my opinion, dont take it the wrong way cause I am not being harsh if I am let me know. I don't want to offend nobody else on here. If you don't want to say it then don't but let the ones who does like it do. Nobody has to force anybody. Gee I sounded a little nicer lol.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:17 pm |
|
kmma wrote: | In my opinion, dont take it the wrong way cause I am not being harsh if I am let me know. I don't want to offend nobody else on here. If you don't want to say it then don't but let the ones who does like it do. Nobody has to force anybody. Gee I sounded a little nicer lol. |
I agree.
Quote: | The saying doesn't bother me, even though I am an atheist. I see it as a formailty, a tradition .... sayings like that our like the Queen of England, a nice little reminder of the past without any real meaning. Then again, I can see why others might be offended. |
I may see why people are offended, but this is a good example of a good, non-Secularist athiest. I say that it's a tradition, and yet I also see it as a good MEANING.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Kate Janeway Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 Posts: 4120 Location: Texas
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:19 pm |
|
^That's fine and all, but the thing is, although it might not have been intended to force or sound forced, some/many will perceive as being such.
-------signature-------
I like children. If they're properly cooked.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:27 pm |
|
Ok, guys, I think that people should have better things to worry about than two words in the pledge. They can leave out those words if they don't like them. Don't waste important peoples time whining about this, and don't waste our taxpayer money on this small little thing when we could be using it for much more important stuff.
|
|
|
Kate Janeway Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 Posts: 4120 Location: Texas
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:33 pm |
|
^Agreed. Now that the horse has been resuscitated and flogged to death again, I hope it can be laid to rest this time.
-------signature-------
I like children. If they're properly cooked.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:50 pm |
|
I agree as well.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:23 pm |
|
JanewayIsHott wrote: | Ok, guys, I think that people should have better things to worry about than two words in the pledge. They can leave out those words if they don't like them. Don't waste important peoples time whining about this, and don't waste our taxpayer money on this small little thing when we could be using it for much more important stuff. |
Are you saying that there should be no hearing?
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:29 pm |
|
Yes, this whole thing is just a waste of time, its two words, if you don't like it, don't say it, you don't have to take it to court. I mean think about it, its is two words that have been in there for what...50 years about....has there been some big religious revolution because of it, has this issue just so terribly violated peoples rights, I doubt it. All this is going to do is waste our tax money. Its almost as bad as that 9-11 hearing.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:36 pm |
|
I really can't see how you think this topic is so trivial. Unless there is a hearing, and a decision is made, people will continue to push for the words to be removed. There needs to be a hearing so this issue can be settled.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:41 pm |
|
Ok, I guess your right, just gets on my nerves that people would care so much about a few words that they dont even have to say.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:46 pm |
|
To them, those "few words" are against their constitutional rights,
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 9:01 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | To them, those "few words" are against their constitutional rights, |
Yes, the Secularists believe that, but my interpretation of the Establishment Clause implied in the 1st Amendment is that ONE SPECIFIC religion, i.e. Christianity, cannot be established by the state, but God applies to virtually ALL religions...
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sat Apr 17, 2004 11:57 pm |
|
I guess we'll just have to wait to find out,
Not to mention, as you said "VIRTUALLY all religions."
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Anti-crombie1 Dr. Greenthumb
Joined: 10 Aug 2002 Posts: 2561 Location: ya mums house
|
Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:31 pm |
|
wow, you really learned how to party since you moved.
Natira wrote: | Wait, maybe here's a better idea. How about we just burn the flag, tear down all the monuments and grave stones for vets and those who gave thier lives fighting for a cause, and start over?
Dont you all see that this nation was founded because of the fact that we were being forced to believe what European Nations told us to? We fought for our freedom of speech, our freedom to worship the God of our choice, or even choose to worship no one.
Have a little respect for those who willingly gave their lives to give you those choices. |
|
|
|
Starbuck faster...
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 8715 Location: between chaos and melody
|
Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:24 pm |
|
I don't think they should be taken out. When I grew up, I was raised to believe everything that I was told about God and religion and America. Then I grew up, and began to question not only my faith, but everything I was told about the country. I started by breaking down the pledge of alleigence. Since I've done that, I have a new perspective. I put my break down of it blow.
I pledge alligence -- I'm with my country
to the flag -- symbolic of the country
of the united states of america -- just what it says
and to the republic -- my country, who rather than run by a monarch or dictator is run as a democracy by a president
for which it stands -- the foundation my country is built on
one nation under God -- one unified nation, under the principals that all believe in
indivisible with liberty and justice for all -- we will not break apart, and we will give you your rights.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Sun Apr 18, 2004 9:23 pm |
|
4evajaneway wrote: | I don't think they should be taken out. When I grew up, I was raised to believe everything that I was told about God and religion and America. Then I grew up, and began to question not only my faith, but everything I was told about the country. I started by breaking down the pledge of alleigence. Since I've done that, I have a new perspective. I put my break down of it blow.
I pledge alligence -- I'm with my country
to the flag -- symbolic of the country
of the united states of america -- just what it says
and to the republic -- my country, who rather than run by a monarch or dictator is run as a democracy by a president
for which it stands -- the foundation my country is built on
one nation under God -- one unified nation, under the principals that all believe in
indivisible with liberty and justice for all -- we will not break apart, and we will give you your rights. |
That is a very good way to break it down. I, personally, believe that God defends us, but I like that way to put it out, for those who don't have a "faith in God, or any God."
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
jbering69 Lieutenant
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 137 Location: Canada
|
Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:22 pm |
|
Y'know originally I was leaning to the side of concern for the words in the American pledge of allegiance, then I re - considered. The reason I re - considered is that I remembered that in Canada'a national anthem there is a part (God keep our land, glorious and free) that can arguably bear the same perceived problem. Then I started thinking about if people wanted to re - word it, and I didn't like it. I am by no means a religious man, but respect the side of tradition. So now I am in the camp of "If you don't like it, then don't say it". We'll see what happens tomorrow.
|
|
|
Deciviel Captain
Joined: 27 Sep 2002 Posts: 508 Location: Joe's Garage
|
Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:09 pm |
|
Wow, this is an old topic. But anyway, I think that the words "Under God" should stay in the pledge. I mean, if someone doesn't want to say it because of their beliefs, they don't have to say it. And how is listening to other people saying it hurting you if you don't beleive in it? Right, it's not.
The funny thing is, the guy who brought this up lives in my city I believe.
-------signature-------
"Wheeee. Now say 'nuclear wessels'."
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:49 pm |
|
Personally I believe it should be taken out.
I do understand that the majority of America is religious and believes in there being a God. I have no issue with that.
My problem lies in the fact that our Founding Fathers designed this country to be secular. They believed that everyone should have the right to practice their own religion, however it should not be brought into the government.
This makes perfect sense, no religion should be surpressed, but absolutly no religion should be used in the government or used to justify actions taken by the government.
I do not believe we should take it to such extremes as France by banning all religious symbols. I just don't think the phrase "In God we trust" should be in our national pledge.
Just putting my two cents in
|
|
|
Arellia The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 4425 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:04 pm |
|
Actually, some of the constitution was based at least somewhat biblically. They didn't appear to want it that secular. Certainly considering the introduction to the Declaraction of Independence. (Even though, and I do note, the Declaration of Independence is not a legal document)
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:51 pm |
|
Although I prefer secularism over religion in many cases, I think it should stay.
Just like, as someone brought up, our Canadian anthem has "God" in it, so can the American Pledge of Allegiance. Remember that the word "God" is not defined, so therefore to the atheists out there it could simply be a three-letter word that is synonymous with a nonexistent postulated omnipotent entity. For believers in a "God", it can mean their "God" of choice. It's a matter of perception.
|
|
|
voy416 Captain
Joined: 28 Oct 2001 Posts: 631 Location: Rock Bottom
|
Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:44 pm |
|
It is not really a big deal whether it says under god OR under the devil WHO CARES
it is not like you have to say it 24/7
hey in some schools u got to say it but hell kids in my High School do not even say it FOR what for the ALL proud USA give me a BREAK
-------signature-------
To Be Are Not To Be......Is That Really The
Question
|
|
|
|