Galaxy/Sovereign Class Ships

Mustkillbret · **Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:36 am**

^yea!

its not set up for diplomatic missions, its a formidable ship, the galaxy looks nicer, its all round, people like it more for its rounded ness, the sovereign is an all out fighter, the pointed warp nacells, the enlongated saucer, the pointy end of the main engineering hull, the rounded ventral section make it take damage better, its a offensive/defensive ship, and one of the best!

PrankishSmart · **Mon Aug 09, 2004 2:00 am**

masaka18 · **Mon Aug 09, 2004 5:38 am**

galaxy is much better most is small and like that small yet powerfull

Otter · **Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:31 am**

I like Galaxy, it's got Class.

3 of 7 · **Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 am**

Well, I prefer the Sovereign. The Enterprise-E is just so beautiful!

And the Sovereign is much more powerful than the Galaxy.

starnova · **Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:28 am**

doesnt the sovereign have better tech overall?

Sonic74205 · **Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:31 am**

Yes it does. Galaxy class was created around the early 2360's and the sovereign was created in the early 2370's So yes it is definately more advanced.

starnova · **Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:27 pm**

too bad sovereign cant do that sacer seperation thing like the glaxay.
i just like tht cool feature

diulei · Ensign Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 54

I prefer the Sovereign only because it's much 'cooler' looking.

I think this is something like comparing a sports car (Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini) to a luxury car (MBenz, BMW, Lexus, and I suppose those ugly Rolls Royces and Bentleys).

Sports cars = Sovereign class. Maneuverable, fast, sleek looking.

Luxury Cars = Galaxy class. Much more comfortable, and has the juice when you need it, just not quite as much.

That's my lame little analogy. Hehe.

With that said, I prefer the exotic sports cars over luxury cars anyday, but I do realize that on a long drive a Mercedes has to be more comfortable than a Porsche. I'd say the same with a Sovereign vs. Galaxy

And then I suppose there's the whole weapons issue, and quantum torpedoes pretty much answers THAT question.

starnova · **Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:27 pm**

If it we're up to looks because i think a galaxy looks better

diulei · Ensign Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 54

starnova · **Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:17 am**

as in
i think the galaxy looks better

diulei · Ensign Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 54

starnova · **Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:20 pm**

nah its ok its my fault

Kuro-chan · **Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:16 pm**

Captain McKinnon · **Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:11 am**

well id have to say soverign because thats voyagers class and i like janeways crew more than picards crew.no offence to those who like TNG mor than voyager

Captain McKinnon · **Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:12 am**

sorverign is way better and it looks good

Captain McKinnon · **Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:10 pm**

Sonic74205 · **Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:50 pm**

Captain McKinnon · **Sat Feb 26, 2005 7:50 am**

both is fine

PrankishSmart · **Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:59 am**

Lt.Hood · Commodore Joined: 29 Oct 2001 Posts: 1801

I like the soveriegn class better than galaxy class.

Why cant they make a battleship class like in the earlier era of ship designing? For instance the uss missouri was a battleship class and it was awesome.

Sonic74205 · **Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:13 pm**

USS Missouri?

Where was that seen?

Lt.Hood · Commodore Joined: 29 Oct 2001 Posts: 1801

M I S S O U R I C L A S S
B A T T L E S H I P ( F B B )

The Missouri class Battleship is one of the best classes of ships in the Federation. It has a very strong set of shields backed up by a strong hull and large amount of weaponry. An interesting fact about its hull design is that it appears to be a hybrid of an Oberth class ship and with a Miranda class saucer section (both sections enlarged of course). This design has allowed the Missouri to carry an unusually large amount of torpedo tubes (five) and still have enough space to mount an assault phaser on the lower pod's spine and have enough spare power for one QCB. The power drain of all of these weapons means that the Missouri class ships have a large set of fusion reactors, separate from the impulse reactor system, which constantly supply power to the main grid during battle. This means that, whenever the a Missouri class ship enters battle, it will definitely have enough power to charge all of its weapons. But unfortunately, it has an almost pathetic top speed (compared to other Federation ships) and a low maneuverability. It has three warp nacelles mounted, directly it seems, on the hull of the ship. This is a great testament to the ship�s strength because warp nacelles are put on pylons for a reason: so that when they warp space they don�t accidentally tear the ship that they are on apart.
SPECS:
Length: 793 meters
Mass: 2,150,000 metric tonnes
Crew: 1,100
Marines: 90
Maximum Impuse: 1,140 kellicams per second
Hull Rating: 9.4
Shield Rating: 198.3
Maneuverability Rating: .24/.06 1,300

WEAPONS:
Fore: 6 phasers, 6 photons, Quantum Carrier Beam
Aft: 5 phasers, 4 photons
Port/Starboard: 4 phasers each

Lt.Hood · Commodore Joined: 29 Oct 2001 Posts: 1801

http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~klingonacademy/forum/images/site/ships/fed018.jpg

The pic is at this website..