Author |
Message |
gamma flyer Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 31
|
Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:13 pm star trek technologies |
|
just thought i would ask if anyone has any ideas about how the star trek technologies would work eg how would the matter anitmatter reaction be conatined and what the shells of the warp cores are made of to contain it
|
|
|
Solitary Poet Captain
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 805 Location: Lancaster (Dallas), Texas
|
|
|
gamma flyer Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 31
|
Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:25 pm |
|
sorry its the first one i did i don't know where to put tit can i change it
|
|
|
Five - seveN Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 3567 Location: Shadow Moon
|
Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:46 pm |
|
the mods will move it.
|
|
|
Thomas Pool Princess
Joined: 08 Jul 2001 Posts: 19730 Location: Manchester
|
Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:01 pm |
|
So will.
[Moved from GSTD to Star Trek Tech]
-------signature-------
Gloss rhymes with hair!
|
|
|
gamma flyer Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 31
|
Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:12 am |
|
thanks
|
|
|
EnsignParis Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 07 Sep 2001 Posts: 257
|
Sun Sep 12, 2004 3:11 pm |
|
The containment of matter/antimatter would have to be done in magnetic fields.
Matter, is just, well, matter. Deuterium is what I believe they use (an isotope of hydrogen - very rare on earth). It doesn't need any special containment other than to keep it cool so it doesn't blow up, and in a sealed container, so the gas doesn't go where we don't want it to.
Antimatter, on the other hand is tricky. It has to be contained using magnetic fields because it cannot contact any form of matter whatsoever, as it will obliterate it on contact. Suspending the anti-deuterium (which is what I'm assuming they are using for maximum energy efficency) in a magnetic field is the only way to hold it without actually touching it in the physical sense.
They are partially able to contain hydrogen plasma using magnetic fields, but it is very unstable and not ready to be used on a large scale.
Not that it matters, because we only have enough antimatter to power a lightbulb for 3 seconds, and it would only take a gram of it to power a ship to mars and back.
Read that last part somewhere. Kind of interesting...It was something like "the secrets of the universe" or something.
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:49 pm |
|
Do you want "cannon" or "real" physics?
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
m021 Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Mar 2004 Posts: 218
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:02 am |
|
Go to www.ditl.org, then to sci-tech, then warp drive.
It will bring you to an enormous piece of text about the Warp Drive, including some pictures.
|
|
|
starnova Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1544 Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:59 pm |
|
how would they generate a magnetic field that could contain the anti-matter?
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm |
|
Superconductors, dude, superconductors.
(They're real, you know.)
|
|
|
starnova Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1544 Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:25 pm |
|
ya but in basic terms what is a superconductor.
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:10 am |
|
A superconductor conducts electrical current with almost no resistance; it takes a fraction as much power to create a given magnetic field as a "regular" conductor.
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
Oliver Thought Maker
Joined: 28 Feb 2004 Posts: 6096 Location: Antwerp, Belgium
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:17 am |
|
webtaz99 wrote: | A superconductor conducts electrical current with almost no resistance; it takes a fraction as much power to create a given magnetic field as a "regular" conductor. |
Doesn't it have to be really cold in order for a superconductor to work? Like nearly absolute zero?
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:11 am |
|
The first superconductors were discovered using liquid hydrogen, and many metals become superconductive at near absolute zero. However, the latest breed of superconducting materials operate around -70C, easily obtainable using liquid nitrogen (which boils around -77C).
Our current understanding of superconductivity involves pairs of electrons which are quantum entangled and move as a single particle. The current theories allow for room-temperature superconductivity, and it is only a matter of time until materials are made which exhibit it.
Given the tremendous capabilities "high temperature" (non-cryogenic) superconductors provide, I suspect the military is farther ahead than the civilian sector in this field.
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
Five - seveN Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 3567 Location: Shadow Moon
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:20 am |
|
EnsignParis wrote: | The containment of matter/antimatter would have to be done in magnetic fields.
Matter, is just, well, matter. Deuterium is what I believe they use (an isotope of hydrogen - very rare on earth). It doesn't need any special containment other than to keep it cool so it doesn't blow up, and in a sealed container, so the gas doesn't go where we don't want it to.
Antimatter, on the other hand is tricky. It has to be contained using magnetic fields because it cannot contact any form of matter whatsoever, as it will obliterate it on contact. Suspending the anti-deuterium (which is what I'm assuming they are using for maximum energy efficency) in a magnetic field is the only way to hold it without actually touching it in the physical sense.
They are partially able to contain hydrogen plasma using magnetic fields, but it is very unstable and not ready to be used on a large scale.
Not that it matters, because we only have enough antimatter to power a lightbulb for 3 seconds, and it would only take a gram of it to power a ship to mars and back.
Read that last part somewhere. Kind of interesting...It was something like "the secrets of the universe" or something. |
They also levitate frogs using superconductors
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:08 am |
|
The scientist who runs the lab where the frogs (and other things) were "levitated" also said that with a bigger chamber and more power he could "levitate your grandmother".
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
gamma flyer Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 31
|
Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:12 pm |
|
thanks ensin paris but i do a-level physiscs so i alreay knew that sorryi mean real and teretical physiscs by the way
|
|
|
starnova Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1544 Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
Sun Sep 19, 2004 2:42 am |
|
thats cool you always see hamtser in labs but never really a frog
|
|
|
Five - seveN Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 3567 Location: Shadow Moon
|
Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:05 am |
|
starnova wrote: | thats cool you always see hamtser in labs but never really a frog |
But frogs are way cooler! Quark's a frog, isn't he?
|
|
|
starnova Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1544 Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:27 am |
|
i thought Quark was more of a rabbit with the big ears.
|
|
|
gamma flyer Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 31
|
Mon May 02, 2005 2:08 pm |
|
all what u guys are saying is ok but when atnimatter is projuced it is not chaged hence the magnetic fields would not work
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Mon May 02, 2005 3:23 pm |
|
Of course it doesn't work. Thats why its called fiction
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
m021 Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Mar 2004 Posts: 218
|
Tue May 03, 2005 8:02 am |
|
I believe it actually does work. The scientific team behind Star Trek made everything so that it would work in theory.
The only problem now is that you would need massive amounts of antimatter to run a spaceship, and they haven't invented yet a way to produce those amounts.
|
|
|
Sonic74205 Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 4081 Location: England
|
Tue May 03, 2005 11:40 am |
|
^ Yeah so far they've only created enough anti matter to power a kettle
I like the whole idea of shields and polarized hull plating. Scientists in the real world are actually working on both. Which makes me love that idea even more!
Plus beam weapons. Lazer pistols are now being mass produced and are being integrated into the english & american armys. Also a large prototype laser emmiter has been fittet to the front of a passenger airplane Boeing 747 (I think. well a plane similar to that anyways) They are testing it now. and they hope to begin placing these laser beams on the front of all major passenger aircraft within the next 3 years.
I love the fact that lots of star trek stuff is beciming real. Even though they do actually have researchers and scientists which make the techology and technobable for star trek
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
|