Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:09 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Defiant in the Delta quadrant
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Deep Space Nine This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSun Aug 08, 2004 9:38 pm    Defiant in the Delta quadrant

This is a thread that is similiar to my VOY in the Alpha Quadrant thread. How does everyong think the Defiant would have done in the Delta Quadrant? The entire main crew and supportive crew is onboard. I don't mean the baddies either. Even Vic Fontain is in the holodeck of it. Do you think there would be any missions they couldn't have overcome that VOY did? Any missions they would have done better than VOY? What are your thoughts?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostMon Aug 09, 2004 4:50 am    

I think the Defiant would have quickly expired in the Delta Quadrant. Its so experimental and fussy, it wouldnt do well. But I think that OBrien is extremely resourceful, so it would have worked.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
gilbert3729
Commander


Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 390
Location: New England, USA

PostMon Aug 09, 2004 4:56 am    

i dont know much about it but isnt it a short ranged fighter ship, i dont think that it would have lasted 70,000 ly to the alpha quadrent. It would have won more battles thou

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostMon Aug 09, 2004 6:14 am    

True the defiant would have managed better in battles and those epiosde when voyager an just get through somat like when they go in that asteroid and in the quandtum singularity...stuff like that. But the Defiant is much too slow and i don't think the crew would be able to manage with no holodecks.


-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
gul Lemek III.
Commodore


Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1513
Location: Slovenia

PostMon Aug 09, 2004 7:16 pm    

It would be a pretty long shot bit I bet It would have managed. At least with O'Briens help.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Aug 10, 2004 7:14 pm    

Yeah, I think in some cases it would be harder. He we don't know for sure the Defiant doesn't have a holodeck. I'll check it to make sure though.

It would tear through the Kazon, Hirogen, and Malon though.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostTue Aug 10, 2004 9:13 pm    

Yeah. Now the battles with the would be Kool

like in Basics pt I & II



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
gul Lemek III.
Commodore


Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1513
Location: Slovenia

PostWed Aug 11, 2004 11:38 am    

I'm sure the Defiant class doesn't have a holodeck, because it's too space-consuming.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Mustkillbret
Rear Admiral


Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 2945
Location: Here and There, Mostly There

PostWed Aug 11, 2004 12:38 pm    

I'm pretty sure I heard sisko or bashir once saying that they had no holodecks


-------signature-------

долженствованиемёртвыйbret - mustkillbret

DONT PANIC!!!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
The_Sisko
Commander


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 356
Location: Columbia NX-02

PostWed Aug 11, 2004 12:41 pm    

Of course it doesn't have a holodeck. It is a ship only built for battle "With no luxurys"


-------signature-------

United Federation of Planets
(New Ships Added)

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
gul Lemek III.
Commodore


Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1513
Location: Slovenia

PostWed Aug 11, 2004 1:07 pm    

The_Sisko wrote:
Of course it doesn't have a holodeck. It is a ship only built for battle "With no luxurys"


My point exactly!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Robsladey
Commodore


Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 1215
Location: Sickbay

PostSat Aug 21, 2004 5:15 pm    

Holodecks can be useful for battle training. A holodeck may be near an armory for improving fighting.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
John Connor
Admiral of the Terran Empire


Joined: 07 Sep 2002
Posts: 15657
Location: I.S.S Emperor

PostSat Aug 21, 2004 6:51 pm    

I dont think if it would lasted long. I think it will be a slim chance if it survived. But who knows.


-------signature-------

Commanding Officer of I.S.S Emperor


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Ronevick
The King


Joined: 23 May 2003
Posts: 11428
Location: (609), New Jersey

PostMon Aug 23, 2004 11:30 am    

It's a good ship, but I don't think that it's large enough or powerful enough to stand up to all of the challenges in the Delta Quadrant.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostTue Aug 24, 2004 2:39 pm    

Indeed. Voyager was destroyed a couple of times, and only restored through some fluke in temporal mechanics, or because it was a duplicate that got destroyed, et cetera.

But that would be an interesting fan fiction to write . . . rewriting all the Voyager episodes to feature the Defiant.

Plus, Admiral Sisko's futuristic shuttle wouldn't have any room to dock in that puny shuttlebay!


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Entropy
Freshman Cadet


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 9

PostWed Aug 25, 2004 6:27 pm    

Remember the Voyager was a Nova class I believe. Thats a science vessel. Lotsa scanners. The Defiant was a 'how many phasers can we stick on this?' ship. A klingon one in other words. Only with decent technology.

So the Defiant woulda kicked ass, but then they would have wanted to scan something and failed. Thus, much death.

I say we send the Enterprise-E over. That would rule.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostWed Aug 25, 2004 7:34 pm    

Entropy wrote:
Remember the Voyager was a Nova class I believe. Thats a science vessel. Lotsa scanners. The Defiant was a 'how many phasers can we stick on this?' ship. A klingon one in other words. Only with decent technology.

So the Defiant woulda kicked ass, but then they would have wanted to scan something and failed. Thus, much death.

I say we send the Enterprise-E over. That would rule.


First of all it was an Intrepid class. Second the Defiant has good enough scanners to nearly match Voyager. Defiant was made after Voyager, so that implies it has the latest technology. Enterprise-E would get screwed in the situations where they had to go through a tight space.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kuro-chan
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 335
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

PostWed Aug 25, 2004 8:47 pm    

Not to be a nitpick, Founder, but wasn't the Defiant-class built before Voyager? Sisko referred to the Defiant project starting as early as 5 years before they got the ship, with the overgunned and overpowered prototype in development.

Granted, starships normally takes years of development before the prototype before it sails out of drycok, but didn't Sisko get his Defiant before Janeway got her Voyager? (Referrs to stardates, etc.)



-------signature-------

-Kuro-chan



View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostWed Aug 25, 2004 8:54 pm    

Maybe you're right about that. I think VOY left in 2371 and the Defiant was brought to DS9 in 2370. Something doesn't fit though. Because VOY left before they knew about the Dominion. Yet they left a year after the Dominion was discovered.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Ronevick
The King


Joined: 23 May 2003
Posts: 11428
Location: (609), New Jersey

PostThu Aug 26, 2004 1:51 pm    

I've said it before and i'll say it again. The writers know nothing!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Five - seveN
Rear Admiral


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 3567
Location: Shadow Moon

PostThu Aug 26, 2004 2:07 pm    

What about a Prometheus in the Delta Quadrant??

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostFri Aug 27, 2004 8:51 am    

The defiant was built in 2369. But there were lots of problems to the ship. In 2370 the defiant was taken to DS9. It is classed as an escort vessel. (Short range and used for scout missions and escorting frieghter convoys)
Unofficially it is a warship. But for battle and thats all. It has limited sensors and engines. The only real good thing about the defiant is it's armaments.

"It has no luxurys, no families and no science labs."
The defiant is too slow and poorly equiped to make it in the delta quadrant. The defiant couldn't even make it to warp 9 until season 6.

The first intrepid class USS Intrepid was built in 2370. USS Voyager was built in 2371.
The intrepid class is a science vessel. It is one of the fastest and has the most sophisticated sensor arrays in the federation fleet. The Intrepid class's engines are designed to run for 3 years without having to refuel.

For it's time the Intrepid class is "state of the art"

It's obviouse that the Defiant is just too ill equiped to handel such a long voyage.



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Ronevick
The King


Joined: 23 May 2003
Posts: 11428
Location: (609), New Jersey

PostFri Aug 27, 2004 11:02 am    

Yeah, but those problems are all probably just because it's an experimental starship class.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
starnova
Commodore


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget

PostWed Sep 01, 2004 12:24 am    

it would do well in battles but not in the long range stuff(as everyone is saying)

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
gul Lemek III.
Commodore


Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 1513
Location: Slovenia

PostThu Sep 02, 2004 12:58 pm    

Anyway, the point is, that the Defiant would get along a lot harder than the Voyager.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2, 3  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com