Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:55 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
coming close to transporter tech
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek Tech This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 7:20 am    coming close to transporter tech

Charlie told me they have found away transfer information electronically between atoms. Basically early tech, comparable to startrek transport tech. I am going to have to get a link and do some research on it of courase. What ya think?

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 7:48 am    

I believe scientists in Demark have successfully transported a photon from one side of a room to another.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 7:52 am    

yes they have. But you cannot transfer data from atom to atom.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 10:47 am    

But they are studying it though and coming close.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hyper
Ensign


Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 60
Location: UK

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 5:32 pm    

kmma wrote:
But they are studying it though and coming close.

CLOSE!!! They are relative galaxies away! Transfering the data is a sinch, it reading the data, thats the hard bit. There are two almost impossible things in star trek:
1. The inertial dampening field
2. The heizenburg compensator

Everything else is entirely probable


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostFri Jun 18, 2004 1:31 pm    

maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostFri Jun 18, 2004 2:38 pm    

Thats cool. There are lots of technologys we have these days that are in the experimental stages cuz startrek came up with the idea


-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hyper
Ensign


Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 60
Location: UK

PostFri Jun 18, 2004 7:48 pm    

CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

Yes there is. Data is just information stored. How can you store information in an atom? Well, if electrons are spinning clockwise, then its 1, spinning anti-clockwise a zero. Tada! Binary information!


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSat Jun 19, 2004 5:08 am    

anything is possible, scietist will break through one day.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostSat Jun 19, 2004 9:41 am    

CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostSat Jun 19, 2004 2:58 pm    

One thing that i think is a bit sad though, is that if they had some technology in real life which was in startrek before it was invented. Then they can't call it by the startrek name cuz of copy right etc.

So a transporter would probably somat like a two way movement device



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
EnsignParis
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 257

PostSun Jun 20, 2004 11:20 am    

m021 wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.

A photon isn't an atom.

and btw, there are no "newtrons" in atoms .


Last edited by EnsignParis on Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:54 pm; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
superwoman
Vice Admiral


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 5742
Location: Sweden

PostSun Jun 20, 2004 11:37 am    

m021 wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.


How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost...


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostMon Jun 21, 2004 3:13 am    

Hyper wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

Yes there is. Data is just information stored. How can you store information in an atom? Well, if electrons are spinning clockwise, then its 1, spinning anti-clockwise a zero. Tada! Binary information!


that is the dumbest thing ive ever heard. You cant control the rotation of electrons anymore that you can control the rotation of the son. and its counter-clockwise. not anit-clockwise. And where the heck did you come up with that anyway?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostMon Jun 21, 2004 3:14 am    

EnsignParis wrote:
m021 wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.

A photon isn't an atom.

and btw, there are now "newtrons" in atoms .


you got proof of this success?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostMon Jun 21, 2004 3:15 am    

superwoman wrote:
m021 wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.


How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost...

no it cant be done. i wont be convinced otherwise until i see some hard evidence


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostMon Jun 21, 2004 7:55 am    

EnsignParis wrote:
A photon isn't an atom.

I know! I didn't mistake, i meant to say photon.

CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
no it cant be done. i wont be convinced otherwise until i see some hard evidence

Here's your hard evidence: http://www.nature.com/nsu/040308/040308-8.html. Someone on another forum said they are using the same technology for making "transporters".

Quote:
How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost...

A photon isn't "the smallest particle", it is a particle of light. (light consists of particles)


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
EnsignParis
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 257

PostThu Jun 24, 2004 11:55 pm    

m021A wrote:
photon isn't "the smallest particle", it is a particle of light. (light consists of particles)


superwoman wrote:
m021 wrote:
CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!

They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.


How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost...


A photon isn't a particle, it is simply 1 complete wave of energy. It's not a particle in the sense that a proton, electron, atom etc. are particles. It's different.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Vortex
Squeak Attack


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 7170
Location: The Edge

PostFri Jun 25, 2004 8:15 am    

Ah, then you might wish to explain why the speed of light has decreased over the many many years.

This is the first sign that einstein's theory isn't correct as a whole. IE. if the lightspeed isn't constant, then there is a problem with his theory.

More can be read here.

Secondly, observations of light (photon's) have shown indications of Inertia. Which is a typical behaviour of mass. Therefore a conclusion can be drawn that photons have mass.

All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!

Never forget:
A true scientist is always considering the flaws in the theories he/she uses. He/she never accepts the given.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostFri Jun 25, 2004 11:29 am    

EnsignParis wrote:

A photon isn't a particle, it is simply 1 complete wave of energy.

Please go read a physics book!
It's assumed that light consists of waves AND particles. These particles are called photons.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostThu Jul 01, 2004 5:41 am    

Vortex wrote:
Ah, then you might wish to explain why the speed of light has decreased over the many many years.

This is the first sign that einstein's theory isn't correct as a whole. IE. if the lightspeed isn't constant, then there is a problem with his theory.

More can be read here.

Secondly, observations of light (photon's) have shown indications of Inertia. Which is a typical behaviour of mass. Therefore a conclusion can be drawn that photons have mass.

All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!

Never forget:
A true scientist is always considering the flaws in the theories he/she uses. He/she never accepts the given.


what the hell are you talking about the speed of light doesnt slow.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
webtaz99
Commodore


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side

PostThu Jul 01, 2004 4:28 pm    

Vortex wrote:

All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!


If nothing is impossible, try slamming a revolving door.



-------signature-------

"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Robsladey
Commodore


Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 1215
Location: Sickbay

PostTue Jul 06, 2004 3:41 am    

Hell try ski-ing through one

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Mustkillbret
Rear Admiral


Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 2945
Location: Here and There, Mostly There

PostWed Aug 04, 2004 11:47 am    

As far as i know, the auzzies encoded some data into a laser stream, then transported it across a lab... not sure how true this is though




OFF TOPIC:

CaptianCircuitGod wrote:
and its counter-clockwise. not anit-clockwise.


and over here, It is Anti-Clockwise, not Counter-Clockwise, so chew on that.



-------signature-------

долженствованиемёртвыйbret - mustkillbret

DONT PANIC!!!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com