| Author |
Message |
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
 Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:20 am coming close to transporter tech |
|
Charlie told me they have found away transfer information electronically between atoms. Basically early tech, comparable to startrek transport tech. I am going to have to get a link and do some research on it of courase. What ya think?
|
|
|
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
| Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:48 am |
|
I believe scientists in Demark have successfully transported a photon from one side of a room to another.
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:52 am |
|
yes they have. But you cannot transfer data from atom to atom.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
| Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:47 am |
|
But they are studying it though and coming close.
|
|
|
Hyper
Ensign
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 60
Location: UK
|
| Thu Jun 17, 2004 5:32 pm |
|
| kmma wrote: | | But they are studying it though and coming close. |
CLOSE!!! They are relative galaxies away! Transfering the data is a sinch, it reading the data, thats the hard bit. There are two almost impossible things in star trek:
1. The inertial dampening field
2. The heizenburg compensator
Everything else is entirely probable
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Fri Jun 18, 2004 1:31 pm |
|
maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE!
|
|
|
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England
|
| Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:38 pm |
|
Thats cool. There are lots of technologys we have these days that are in the experimental stages cuz startrek came up with the idea 
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
Hyper
Ensign
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 60
Location: UK
|
| Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:48 pm |
|
| CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
Yes there is. Data is just information stored. How can you store information in an atom? Well, if electrons are spinning clockwise, then its 1, spinning anti-clockwise a zero. Tada! Binary information!
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
| Sat Jun 19, 2004 5:08 am |
|
anything is possible, scietist will break through one day.
|
|
|
m021
Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218
|
| Sat Jun 19, 2004 9:41 am |
|
| CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again.
|
|
|
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England
|
| Sat Jun 19, 2004 2:58 pm |
|
One thing that i think is a bit sad though, is that if they had some technology in real life which was in startrek before it was invented. Then they can't call it by the startrek name cuz of copy right etc.
So a transporter would probably somat like a two way movement device 
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
EnsignParis
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 257
|
| Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:20 am |
|
| m021 wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again. |
A photon isn't an atom.
and btw, there are no "newtrons" in atoms  .
Last edited by EnsignParis on Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
superwoman
Vice Admiral
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 5742
Location: Sweden
|
| Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:37 am |
|
| m021 wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again. |
How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost...
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Mon Jun 21, 2004 3:13 am |
|
| Hyper wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
Yes there is. Data is just information stored. How can you store information in an atom? Well, if electrons are spinning clockwise, then its 1, spinning anti-clockwise a zero. Tada! Binary information! |
that is the dumbest thing ive ever heard. You cant control the rotation of electrons anymore that you can control the rotation of the son. and its counter-clockwise. not anit-clockwise. And where the heck did you come up with that anyway?
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Mon Jun 21, 2004 3:14 am |
|
| EnsignParis wrote: | | m021 wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again. |
A photon isn't an atom.
and btw, there are now "newtrons" in atoms . |
you got proof of this success?
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Mon Jun 21, 2004 3:15 am |
|
| superwoman wrote: | | m021 wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again. |
How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost... |
no it cant be done. i wont be convinced otherwise until i see some hard evidence
|
|
|
m021
Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218
|
| Mon Jun 21, 2004 7:55 am |
|
| EnsignParis wrote: | | A photon isn't an atom. |
I know! I didn't mistake, i meant to say photon. 
| CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | no it cant be done. i wont be convinced otherwise until i see some hard evidence |
Here's your hard evidence: http://www.nature.com/nsu/040308/040308-8.html. Someone on another forum said they are using the same technology for making "transporters".
| Quote: | | How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost... |
A photon isn't "the smallest particle", it is a particle of light. (light consists of particles)
|
|
|
EnsignParis
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 257
|
| Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:55 pm |
|
| m021A wrote: | | photon isn't "the smallest particle", it is a particle of light. (light consists of particles) |
| superwoman wrote: | | m021 wrote: | | CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | maybe you werent paying attention there is no possible way to send data from atom to atom. Get it? they are made up of protons electrons newtrons and quarks. IT JUST CANT BE DONE! |
They already HAVE done it! I think it's called "quantum entanglement" or something. They have successfully stored info in a photon and read it again. |
How can they possible store information in a photon? I thought a photon was the smallest particle... You can't store anything in something that is smallest? Can you? I'm lost... |
A photon isn't a particle, it is simply 1 complete wave of energy. It's not a particle in the sense that a proton, electron, atom etc. are particles. It's different.
|
|
|
Vortex
Squeak Attack
Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 7170
Location: The Edge
|
| Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:15 am |
|
Ah, then you might wish to explain why the speed of light has decreased over the many many years.
This is the first sign that einstein's theory isn't correct as a whole. IE. if the lightspeed isn't constant, then there is a problem with his theory.
More can be read here.
Secondly, observations of light (photon's) have shown indications of Inertia. Which is a typical behaviour of mass. Therefore a conclusion can be drawn that photons have mass.
All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!
Never forget:
A true scientist is always considering the flaws in the theories he/she uses. He/she never accepts the given.
|
|
|
m021
Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218
|
| Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:29 am |
|
| EnsignParis wrote: |
A photon isn't a particle, it is simply 1 complete wave of energy. |
Please go read a physics book!
It's assumed that light consists of waves AND particles. These particles are called photons.
|
|
|
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant
|
| Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:41 am |
|
| Vortex wrote: | Ah, then you might wish to explain why the speed of light has decreased over the many many years.
This is the first sign that einstein's theory isn't correct as a whole. IE. if the lightspeed isn't constant, then there is a problem with his theory.
More can be read here.
Secondly, observations of light (photon's) have shown indications of Inertia. Which is a typical behaviour of mass. Therefore a conclusion can be drawn that photons have mass.
All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!
Never forget:
A true scientist is always considering the flaws in the theories he/she uses. He/she never accepts the given. |
what the hell are you talking about the speed of light doesnt slow.
|
|
|
webtaz99
Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: The Other Side
|
| Thu Jul 01, 2004 4:28 pm |
|
| Vortex wrote: |
All this theory is still in its babyshoes, therefore NOTHING is impossible. Improbable maybe, but impossible, no!
|
If nothing is impossible, try slamming a revolving door.
-------signature-------
"History is made at night! Character is who you are in the dark." (Lord John Whorfin)
|
|
|
Robsladey
Commodore
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 1215
Location: Sickbay
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:41 am |
|
Hell try ski-ing through one
|
|
|
Mustkillbret
Rear Admiral
Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 2945
Location: Here and There, Mostly There
|
| Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:47 am |
|
As far as i know, the auzzies encoded some data into a laser stream, then transported it across a lab... not sure how true this is though
OFF TOPIC:
| CaptianCircuitGod wrote: | | and its counter-clockwise. not anit-clockwise. |
and over here, It is Anti-Clockwise, not Counter-Clockwise, so chew on that.
-------signature-------
долженствованиемёртвыйbret - mustkillbret
DONT PANIC!!!
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
