Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:57 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Is their anybody worse than Osama?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Curtis
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 29 Sep 2001
Posts: 14903
Location: Wisconsin

PostTue Oct 07, 2003 6:25 am    

1Jer wrote:
It could be oil, but remember America only gets about 20% of its oil from the middle east. I think it was a number of reasons, some of them good like freeing the people. Some of the other reasons might not have been so good, but you'll prob. never find the real reasons.


Yes, it could be Oil, but that is highly doubted. I feel the main reason behind this war is to free people and you probably will never know the real reason...I agree on that.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Thomas
Pool Princess


Joined: 08 Jul 2001
Posts: 19730
Location: Manchester

PostTue Oct 07, 2003 10:07 am    

jbi507 wrote:
and chocho_11 how do u know if they were making weapons, along with how do u know they ppl really hated him? u dont, u just get your info from wat the news says? therefore you are a muppet. (lol, no offense)


Prove me wrong, instead of coming back with these "How do you know...?" arguments. We do know how badly Saddam was treating the people of Iraq, so explain to me how they could fail to hate him for that.



-------signature-------

Gloss rhymes with hair!

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
jbi507
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 254
Location: DS9

PostTue Oct 07, 2003 7:44 pm    

whatever man, i dont care no more, think what ever u want. think saddam had sooooo much money to make the weapons, think that bush and blair were acting out of good faith.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostTue Oct 07, 2003 8:34 pm    

Yeah, poor Saddam, and poor, poor Osama, Do your homework.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostWed Oct 08, 2003 12:18 am    

^Hey T, nice sig. They'll roll over Boston like they usually do.

jbi507 wrote:
whatever man, i dont care no more, think what ever u want. think saddam had sooooo much money to make the weapons, think that bush and blair were acting out of good faith.


You're quite the Pessimist aren't you? You can think what YOU want, because we have TRUE PROVEN FACTS on our side.



-------signature-------

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." President Thomas Jefferson

"A man's respect for law and order exists in precise relationship to the size of his paycheck." Adam Clayton Powell Jr.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostWed Oct 08, 2003 1:15 am    

ok let me clear this up Im the most evil person everyone hates me and everyone wants me dead or atleast dying of the bubonic plague lol

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Oct 08, 2003 5:43 pm    

Link, the Hero of Time wrote:
^Hey T, nice sig. They'll roll over Boston like they usually do.



Remember 1918? Be ready to replace it with 2003,


````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````



Apparently controlling a country, and it's oil, doesn't pay as much as one would think...



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostWed Oct 08, 2003 9:04 pm    

sure.... believe what you want


-------signature-------

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." President Thomas Jefferson

"A man's respect for law and order exists in precise relationship to the size of his paycheck." Adam Clayton Powell Jr.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Oct 08, 2003 9:10 pm    




I shall do my utmost,


To stay OT, uhhh, Osama sucks,



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostSat Oct 11, 2003 7:05 am    

Both points of the argument have got facts for and against. Its up to the individual to deside what they believe. Saddam was hated, but so far no weapons have been found. With that before you its up to you to decide what reason the coalition went in - for money or human rights.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostSat Oct 11, 2003 7:05 am    

Both points of the argument have got facts for and against. Its up to the individual to deside what they believe. Saddam was hated, but so far no weapons have been found. With that before you its up to you to decide what reason the coalition went in - for money or human rights.

(T - stealing someones avatar )


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Oct 11, 2003 9:49 am    

^Actually, no, Someone else made mine. The words just aren't in it yet.



Quote:
New Report Discloses Dozens of Weapons of Mass Destruction Program Activities in Iraq


According to the Wall Street Journal a new report shows that Saddam Hussein had "dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002." The Wall Street Journal makes note of the findings to rebut other media reports that say the latest inspections by U.S. inspector, David Kay have unearthed no new information in his short, three month search.

The revelations about Hussein's weapons of terror include a prison laboratory complex "possibly used in human testing of BW agents" in addition to strains of biological organisms that could be used as weapons, reports the Journal. The assignment has also served to spotlight Saddam's success in deceiving the United Nations and the world as to the state of his weapons programs.

The Wall Street Journal concludes by saying, "Even if no stockpiles are ever found, the Kay report provides ample proof of Saddam's WMD threat and how much safer the world is with him out of power."




-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSat Oct 11, 2003 10:38 am    

^Clearly, I've never understood why people say things such as "They haven't found any proof" I mean, if he was still in power, he'd be making them (WMD) currently or soon. We are better off without him in power, and so are the Iraqi people.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostSat Oct 11, 2003 12:01 pm    

Yes, I agree, but the reasons might not be the ones that the coalition went in. The problem is that it could cause a rush for nuclear weapons as North Vietnam is thought to have nukes, and western countries won't attack in case they use them.

((Sorry about the double post before - it wasn't working I though, and I quickly desided to change a bit, so the time was long enough away.))


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostMon Oct 13, 2003 7:41 pm    

We don't attack North Vietnam Because We know they have nukes and they have a leader crazy enough to use them. And since South Vietnam was our ally once, we try to talk North Vietnam into disarming the nukes because on more then one occasion North Vietnam has threatened to nuke South Vietnam.

But knowing Bush and other countries in the Firing range of the Nukes. The first sign of disarmament and we're going in to make sure They're never going to threaten people with them again.



-------signature-------

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." President Thomas Jefferson

"A man's respect for law and order exists in precise relationship to the size of his paycheck." Adam Clayton Powell Jr.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
sabertooth1217
UPN Boycotter


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 11484
Location: Texas

PostMon Oct 13, 2003 7:58 pm    

there should be no such thing as nukes. period.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Mac Harm
True Captain


Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 377
Location: Sailing the ocean blue... well its green actually.

PostTue Oct 14, 2003 4:47 am    

It depends on your point of view.
But i hate anyone who kills or injures just one person.
(i hope noone here has)


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostTue Oct 14, 2003 10:23 am    

It would be a perfect world if no nukes were needed. Unfortuntly that won't happen. The "goodies" then need nukes to protect themselves from the bad people who have them.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Paris10
Commander


Joined: 26 Aug 2001
Posts: 458
Location: estados unidos

PostFri May 07, 2004 10:13 pm    

Do any of you think Donald Rumsfield should resign from the Defense Dept. after not telling Bush about the prisoner abuse? I don't think so...

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostFri May 07, 2004 10:58 pm    

/\ I think this should possibly have been its own new topic.....but to answer your question, yes, I would love if he resigned.....

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Monkey
Captain


Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 833
Location: On a quest you probably wouldn't believe.

PostSat May 08, 2004 12:27 am    

yea i know that i'm late but i'm going to post my oppinon of the worst ppls.
(and i am calculating these by how many innocent lives they were responsible for killinng or worngfully opressing. And from my own viwes.)

1) Hitler
2) FDR
3) Oda Nobunaga
4) Saddam
hmm..... thats all i can think right now


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat May 08, 2004 10:34 am    

FDR... Care to elaborate?


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostSat May 08, 2004 12:01 pm    

FDR!?!? I am confused. Are we talking about Mr. Roosevelt?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostSat May 08, 2004 4:30 pm    

I do believe he's talking about how FDR dropped the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


-------signature-------

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." President Thomas Jefferson

"A man's respect for law and order exists in precise relationship to the size of his paycheck." Adam Clayton Powell Jr.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSat May 08, 2004 4:36 pm    

That's pretty silly. The use of those bombs saved thousands of lives.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com