Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:53 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Message From America (from Robin Williams)
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 11:29 am    

Maquis74656 wrote:

Not to mention the scenario that the tyrant takes over all of Europe. Do you see the threat to the US then? I know you don't care, but we do. Kinda like things where they are.


You went to war when Japan attacked you. The preident wanted to go to war, but the public pressure was too great for him to be able to. When Japan attacked this gave him the necissary jumpstart to be able to help with europe. Maybe it wouldn't have affected America straight away, but if Europe was defeated the Axis powers would have a free reign to attack your shipping. They could also send troops and ships to island hop the pacific to attack you. This might not have instinateous effects, but would kill many and wear down the economy.

The problem is that it is good to give many of the poorer countries money. Unfortunaly a lot of it is spent to weapons and not given to the people. This could sound harsh, but if MEDC (More Economically Developed Countries) gave money to the poor countries where it was well used then this could cause the people in other countries to rise up. It might not, but it's a suggestion.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 1:41 pm    

France asked for assistance quite recently, actually. Do a search about the heat wave there this past year.
England requested men and munitions and money in WWII. And you can't say that was a long time ago, because that would be included in the "overthrowing tyrants" comment.

I never said Bush was a "good guy". Do I support my president? Yes. Did Saddam need to go? Yes. Osama? Yes.

But there is no way you are going to say that the South American stuff has anything to do with Bush. If you are as widely versed in American politics as you claim to be, (and yes, you do, by telling us everything that is wrong with America), then you would know that it takes 2 or 3 years for anything from one Presidential Administration (term), is felt. Most of the things in the first 2-3 years of Bush's term was from things enacted by Clinton, a total moron. Just because a law is passed, (or a precendent), on Monday, does not mean it's enacted on Tuesday.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 4:07 pm    

I know that. I also support Bush unlike many Europeans, but it was just one or two of your points that you didn't answer for me. It was the points of CappyD. I also agree that Saddam had to go. The only think is the after effects could have been thought out a little more. This might have caused less deaths in the post war period thats going on. I don't know if anybody remembers this, but Bush was going to cut down greatly in its international peacekeeper role, such as withdrawing most of its forces from Israel, until 9/11.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 4:20 pm    

Sorry, forgot to quote Dappet. I wasn't directly replying to you.
And yes, Bush did say he was going to recall peacekeeping troops. But as you said, that was before 9/11. An event that just went to prove why such troops are necessary. Remember the USS COLE?
And after every war there is death like this. Especially when a land is occupied. I.e., Germany. I have friends over in Iraq now. One was just home on leave. He said that the people there are glad to see them. The poor people. Who controls the media? The wealthy. Even in such a country as Iraq, even in it's condition. Of course there is going to be violence. For some of them, this is like a jihad. They consider it a spiritual thing, and history has shown time and time again that people are more willing to die for their spiritual beleifs than anything else.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 4:23 pm    

Additionally, it is a forgone conclusion that the US will never abandon Israel. To do so would be horrifyingly detrimental to us.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 4:30 pm    

I know that there will be deaths after a war, but I'm saying that there could maybe have been a bit more thought put into the post war period. It seemed to be a highly sucessful war, but the period after their not particularly sure what to do now, except keep the peace. It seems to be costing Bush his chance of becoming president again, although the lives being lost are far more important. Theres a few each day on the news.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostWed Nov 12, 2003 4:34 pm    

^I agree with that. There should have been more thought to post war Iraq.
I do know that if I don't leave now I'll be late for work, So I'll respond more at a later time,



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Slash_Gordon
Commander


Joined: 11 Oct 2003
Posts: 416
Location: Voyager - Deck 6

PostThu Nov 13, 2003 7:35 am    

Quote:
Captain Dappet said:
When was the last time England or france came and asked you for help?



If another Hitler shows up at their doorstep, or I should say, if another Hitler comes knocking down their door... both of those countries will be wanting America's help.... again!

As far as being prepared for post-war Iraq. I think that's impossible when there's terrorism involved. Nations have tried to be prepared for crime for decades and still can't solve it... and terrorism is a much more organized and sophisticated type of crime. It cannot be stopped, unfortunately. How can anyone say that Bush or someone else didn't prepare, when they weren't in the room at the time? Terrorism is a tough thing to overcome. Just ask the Israelis, and they're probably the most prepared country in the world, when it comes to terrorism.
BTW, Robin Williams didn't actually write that.


Last edited by Slash_Gordon on Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:47 am; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostThu Nov 13, 2003 7:44 am    

Isreal's just been voted the most dangerous country in the world in an European poll. Just thought I'd share

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostThu Nov 13, 2003 10:36 am    

Quote:
If another Hitler shows up at their doorstep, or I should say, if another Hitler comes knocking down their door... both of those countries will be wanting America's help.... again!

As far as being prepared for post-war Iraq. I think that's impossible when there's terrorism involved. Nations have tried to be prepared for crime for decades and still can't solve it... and terrorism is a much more organized and sophisticated type of crime. It cannot be stopped, unfortunately. How can anyone say that Bush or someone else didn't prepare, when they weren't in the room at the time? Terrorism is a tough thing to overcome. Just ask the Israelis, and they're probably the most prepared country in the world, when it comes to terrorism.


Its not the fighting after, but rather the getting the services such as the hospitals and so on up. If this went quickly they could also get out quickly and cut down the deaths. Also if another Hitler came along that could threaten these countries then america would have to repond as they would threaten a lot of American lives. The Starwars system needs britain to operate, otherwise they wouldn't have enough warning.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
davecenter
Commander


Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 391
Location: The Bridge

PostThu Nov 13, 2003 6:41 pm    

Seven of Nine wrote:
Isreal's just been voted the most dangerous country in the world in an European poll. Just thought I'd share


I'm sorry to say this, and this is against absolutely no one, but that is just a pile of bull. If anything, Israel is the most oppressed and persecuted nation. And then because the defend themselves against terrorist jerks, they are thought to be the most dangerous nation. I think it should the be the other way around. The terrorists are the most dangerous force in the existence of this planet. Yes i do mean that. Think about it. If someone is attacked by terrorists, the attacked people might retaliate, which could lead to war, which could drag allies into war, which could result in a nuclear standoff that could destroy the world. And there is enough nuclear firepower to do just that. I think we had better clear out the terrorists before something like this becomes a reality.



-------signature-------

Some think they are great, some want to be great, but very few are truly great

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostThu Nov 13, 2003 8:01 pm    

^I totally agree. Palestinian terrorists board a bus with children on it, blow it to hell. The Israeli's retaliate against the Palestinian military. Those evil Israelis, persecuting the Palestinians. *And all Arab nations, of course.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Slash_Gordon
Commander


Joined: 11 Oct 2003
Posts: 416
Location: Voyager - Deck 6

PostFri Nov 14, 2003 6:27 am    

Quote:
1Jer said:
Its not the fighting after, but rather the getting the services such as the hospitals and so on up.


Actually, it is the fighting that's slowing the improvement of jobs, which is the #1 problem... which is unemployment. The utilities are better now than in pre-war Iraq. Elecricity wasn't on 100%, through-out pre-war Iraq until now. Hospitals are doing at least as good as pre-war Iraq. And, they aren't being used as torture chambers anymore.

Quote:
1Jer said:
If this went quickly they could also get out quickly and cut down the deaths.



The Americans and their allies can't leave 'til there's a stable government and 'til they have a strong enough police force and military. Otherwise, Hussein could be right back in there.

Quote:
1Jer said:
Also if another Hitler came along that could threaten these countries then america would have to repond as they would threaten a lot of American lives.


America wouldn't have to do anything. People made their choice to live wherever they want to. The only reason why America would need to get themselves involved, without anyone asking them, is 'cuz of national interests... for example, oil and terrorism.
Other countries assumes too much, that America will help them. But, will a time come that the U.S.A. will say," Screw you. Where were you when we could've used your help? "
Kuwait has shown and still show their appreciaton to America for helping them. France? Well, they showed their appreciation by giving us the Statue of Libery. This is what I say about that... Give it back to them !

Quote:
1Jer said:
The Starwars system needs britain to operate, otherwise they wouldn't have enough warning.


That's off the subject. Britain has nothing to prove when it comes to being allies with America. The same with Australia, Poland, Spain and few other countries that I can't think of right now.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
davecenter
Commander


Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 391
Location: The Bridge

PostFri Nov 14, 2003 12:39 pm    

Thanks for agreeing T. I just hate that people could do that to children.


-------signature-------

Some think they are great, some want to be great, but very few are truly great

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 7:08 am    

I didn't say I thought Isreal was the most dangerous country in the world... although it's certainly a dangerous country to live in. I just posted what was in the paper that day.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 11:37 am    

And that's why no one directed their comments towards you. Only the words posted.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 11:46 am    

I think the U.S.A is the most dangerous country in the world.

If any other nation would have as much weapons as the U.S, they would be running to the U.N and ask them to disarm the nation.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:04 pm    

Clarify. You think the US under it's own control is most dangerous. But as long as we do as others tell us, then it's ok.
Tell me, were you also scared of the UK? You know, back when the controlled most of continental Europe? Germany? Hell, let's go back to the Romans. Were they bad dudes, too?
Give me one solid, unbiased, fact backed example where the US went to a foreign country, (not talking the Native Americans, because we all know that was wrong, and slavery), but went to a sovreign foreign country and conquered it, making it ours? Tell me when these WMDs that the US posesses were ever used for our, and ours alone, benefit? When have we aimed our nukes at a country and demanded they do as we say, or we will fire?
Did we drop nukes on Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Yes. Was it to save only American lives? No. I have had this discussion with you before, and you've made it clear you think otherwise, but the experts involved seriously disagree with you. Experts on both sides.
I know talking to you is like talking to a brick wall, because sadly, at such a young age you refuse to try to consider any other point of view than your own, but my mind can be changed. So prove it.
I've studied World History and American History, so I know what I'm saying. I research situations, read accounts from all different angles. I am openminded. Yes, I'm pro-American. As an American, should I be less? I've admitted that the US is by no means perfect, but we are not nearly as evil as you try to make us out to be.
So, after you take the time to answer the questions posed, if you do, know that I'd prefer that your posts be more factual than rhetoric. You say we are a propoganda fed country, yet I've yet to hear you say one thing that sounds like an original thought for a what, 14 year old?



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:07 pm    

Captain Dappet wrote:

If any other nation would have as much weapons as the U.S, they would be running to the U.N and ask them to disarm the nation.


And this greatly amuses me. An opinion, a VERY erroneous opinion, stated as fact.
Do you not remember the beginning of the war with Iraq? The UN is weak. They refuse to uphold their own mandates, lol. The US won't be running to them anytime soon.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:17 pm    

Quote:
Clarify. You think the US under it's own control is most dangerous. But as long as we do as others tell us, then it's ok.
Tell me, were you also scared of the UK? You know, back when the controlled most of continental Europe? Germany? Hell, let's go back to
the Romans. Were they bad dudes, too?


How the hell do you expect me to know? I wasnt born, and neither were you.

Quote:
Give me one solid, unbiased, fact backed example where the US went to a foreign country, (not talking the Native Americans, because we all know that was wrong, and slavery), but went to a sovreign foreign country and conquered it, making it ours?

Never said that you had conquered anything.

Quote:
Tell me when these WMDs that the US posesses were ever used for our, and ours alone, benefit? When have we aimed our nukes at a country and demanded they do as we say, or we will fire?
Did we drop nukes on Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Yes. Was it to save only American lives? No. I have had this discussion with you before, and you've made it clear you think otherwise, but the experts involved seriously disagree with you. Experts on both sides.

As you said, we talked about that before.
Quote:
I know talking to you is like talking to a brick wall,

I can only say that its the same thing talking to you.

Quote:
because sadly, at such a young age you refuse to try to consider any other point of view than your own, but my mind can be changed. So prove it.

I've yet to see when your view will EVER change on ANYTHING.

Quote:
I research situations, read accounts from all different angles. I am openminded.

If its something youre NOT, its openminded.

Quote:
Yes, I'm pro-American. As an American, should I be less? I've admitted that the US is by no means perfect, but we are not nearly as evil as you try to make us out to be.

Im not saying that you are really evil, and meaning it. I say that many in your nation are overly self-confident and sometimes arrogant and trust your government too much.

Quote:
So, after you take the time to answer the questions posed, if you do, know that I'd prefer that your posts be more factual than rhetoric. You say we are a propoganda fed country, yet I've yet to hear you say one thing that sounds like an original thought for a what, 14 year old?

Thats your opinion. Just because Im younger than you, doesnt mean I cant think for myself.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:20 pm    

Thank you for proving my point and turning that into a personal attack, And if you actually pay attention, you'll have seen I've changed my mind about situations here before, but, apparently you do not pay attention.

And, btw, you never answered anything. I take it you fear a loaded gun lying dormant on a table, too.



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:22 pm    

Maquis74656 wrote:
I know talking to you is like talking to a brick wall,

And this isnt a personal attack against me?


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:28 pm    

No, actually it's not. It's an expression. It means talking to a very opinionated person who rarely listens to what others have to say, as they have already formed their own opinion and see no chance that they could be wrong.
That's where we differ. I've said many times to offer solid proof to some of your statements, but you've yet to do that. That's not my problem. I'm making an active effort to understand where you are coming from, but you apparently think, "this is what I think, and I don't care what anyone says". Hence the term "brick wall".



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:32 pm    

Its simply that I've been brought up and taught NOT to trust the media.

And I really have no idea where to find these facts online, in order to prove them to you.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostSat Nov 15, 2003 12:37 pm    

I'm having trouble with that last statement... You say alot, which must mean you have a constant source... There must be something you can offer.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com