Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:51 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Why does the Voyager Nacelles change position?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek Tech This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Dax Orien
Helmsman


Joined: 24 Aug 2001
Posts: 856
Location: My own little hell.

PostMon Jun 02, 2003 9:20 am    Why does the Voyager Nacelles change position?

I was just wondering why on the Voyager the ship's nacelles altered their positions from pure horizantal to slanted.


-------signature-------

"Let's all sing the 'Doom Song'!" ~~~ Gir
"Gir, it's been nice working with you, now self-destruct."
"FINALLY!"
Conversation between Zim and Gir in the episode entitled "Dibs Wonderful Life"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostMon Jun 02, 2003 9:34 am    

To prevent damage to subspace is suposedly the tech explanation. Why they were just not in the slanted position all the time in that case is beyond me.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostMon Jun 02, 2003 11:23 am    

Yeah, but, how? I mean, they change positions........does it activate a few new commands, and switch from primary systems to warp systems? I'll go check the Daystrom.....

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Dax Orien
Helmsman


Joined: 24 Aug 2001
Posts: 856
Location: My own little hell.

PostTue Jun 03, 2003 9:11 am    

Yeah! See my point though. I really don't know what they do to protect anything. They just seem like a new toy to make it look more like the [/i]Enterprise D

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
The Delta Flyer
Commodore


Joined: 08 Apr 2002
Posts: 2163
Location: East Yorkshire

PostTue Jun 03, 2003 11:13 am    

Voyager wasn't put together properly...the "hinges" on the nacelles weren't tight enough and when they went to warp, the speed pushed the nacelles upwards. Once they dropped out of warp they fell down again.

only joking, that wouldn't happen anyway with space being a vaccuum (me thinks). It was supposedly something to do with not damaging subspace or something. And also a new feature to help define a new ship on the part of the creators/producers/you know who I means...


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Dax Orien
Helmsman


Joined: 24 Aug 2001
Posts: 856
Location: My own little hell.

PostWed Jun 04, 2003 9:02 am    

Damaging subspace?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
stv12
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 337

PostThu Jun 05, 2003 5:03 am    

Yup. Starfleet said something about normal warp nacelles damaging subspace, polluting if you will. But why the nacelles don't slant forever is beyond me.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Dax Orien
Helmsman


Joined: 24 Aug 2001
Posts: 856
Location: My own little hell.

PostThu Jun 05, 2003 9:03 am    

I wonder if it makes the ship more maneuverable or something of that nature.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostThu Jun 05, 2003 4:50 pm    

Actually, without knowing all of the technical specs, I can figure somewhat of it out.

Do you guys remember the TNG episode, oh, what was it called, well, it was the episode with the Enterprise in search of a vessel that was lost in a conduit. In this conduit, warp travel was limited, and the Tarellians lined this conduit with mines that disabled your ship. Well, in this episode, the Tarellians showed that "ripples" in subspace were destroying their planet, and in order to prove this, she initiated a warp-core breach, which caused a huge rip in subspace.

Perhaps the new nacelle design was to prevent, or perhaps soften the blow to subspace.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Tez The Trekker
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 79

PostThu Jun 05, 2003 5:36 pm    

YOUR ALL WRONG

i read the voyager has bending nacells so that they can get in the proper position to create a warp field


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
stv12
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 337

PostThu Jun 05, 2003 8:43 pm    

I still think it prevents subspace...And look at all theother ships...with out this "Varible Geometry" nacelles as thet call it...they have normal nacelles and still are able to create a warp field.

Quote:
Development of the intrepid class went relatively smoothly in the early and mid stages, but a major problem arose in 2370 with the discovery that the energy emissions of standard warp drives caused considerable cumulative damage to the structure of subspace. Starfleet called for all designs then in progress to be modified to eliminate this effect, and it was decided to use the Intrepid class as a test bed for this technology. After some experimentation it was found that the effect could be avoided by using a warp field with a much elongated Z-axis, combined with complex warp field modulation and the utilization of new materials during the manufacture of warp coils. This has led to the ships saucer section having the forward ellipse now becoming common on Federation designs. The new warp field configuration did lead to a 15% reduction in the speed of the Intrepid class across all flight regimes, bringing the top cruise speed down from Warp 9.99 to Warp 9.975, and the maximum rated speed from Warp 9.992 to Warp 9.985.


That is taken from that ditl.org site...its speculation, but its the only sensible answer.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostSat Jun 07, 2003 8:57 pm    

Tez The Trekker wrote:
YOUR ALL WRONG

i read the voyager has bending nacells so that they can get in the proper position to create a warp field



1) Buddy, calm down. This is a flame-free area. Very fire-retardent.
2) No, we're not.
3) Your = Implication of ownership, You're = You are.

The nacelles "bend" to create the new warp field to help prevent further damages, or at least lighten the damages to subspace.

Or so we are to understand.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain CB
Captain


Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 587
Location: U.S.S Retribution

PostSun Jun 08, 2003 2:55 am    

yes the warp nacelles move so they don't damage subspace. But they dont stay up all the time because it would decrease impulse engine effiecency. (the impulse engines were built into the nacelle pylons to save materials) And they don't stay down all the time because the warp field is not properly formed if anything is inbetween the nacelles


-------signature-------

"I can feel everything you feel. In fact I fell exactly what you feel" Shinzon
StarTrek Nemesis

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitomi
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 08 Nov 2002
Posts: 274
Location: The Mystic Moon

PostMon Jun 09, 2003 10:51 am    

^^^
Exactly. In fact, this topic was discussed a while back, to the same conclusion, sorta.
Anyway, You've got it right Captain CB, the impulse engines would not work as well in the tilt position, so they hinged the nacells.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
starnova
Commodore


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget

PostFri Aug 27, 2004 12:34 pm    

Lt.BirdGod wrote:
Tez The Trekker wrote:
YOUR ALL WRONG

i read the voyager has bending nacells so that they can get in the proper position to create a warp field



1) Buddy, calm down. This is a flame-free area. Very fire-retardent.
2) No, we're not.
3) Your = Implication of ownership, You're = You are.

The nacelles "bend" to create the new warp field to help prevent further damages, or at least lighten the damages to subspace.

Or so we are to understand.


ya i agree you should clam down.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com