Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:54 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Why does the first enterprise look more advanced than kirks?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Enterprise This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Bugger Boy
Commodore


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 1402
Location: U.S.S Soveriegn

PostSun Sep 01, 2002 10:54 am    

Didn't work though


-------signature-------

FREKAZEE.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Zeke Zabertini
Captain


Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 4832

PostSun Sep 15, 2002 1:19 am    

Looks arent everything. It looks more advanced, because in a real word sense, it is. NX-01 is a computer generated model with very high detail. NCC-1701 was a traditional model, and not the best model at that.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostSun Sep 15, 2002 1:21 am    

Computer graphics


-------signature-------

~Tony Montana wrote:
You know what you need people like me people for you to snub your nose at and point at saying there is a bad man. Well guess what This bad man is leaving. Say goodnight to the BAD MAN!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Chinesetrekkie
Council Leader


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 9719
Location: Windsor, California [Shenyang, China]

PostSun Sep 15, 2002 1:22 am    

Well, technology wise, and our tv's are more HD than the ones in the 1950's.


-------signature-------

You may call me Shen [The Chinesetrekkie]

910th User to Register for STV.com

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
thegame
Captain


Joined: 11 Sep 2002
Posts: 752
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostWed Sep 18, 2002 8:51 am    

Because the origonal Enterprise was designed in the mid 1960's and the NX-01 Enterprise was designed in 2000 or 2001.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
parralax
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 22 Aug 2002
Posts: 82

PostFri Sep 20, 2002 2:01 pm    

I think that Enterprise looks more advanced because of better grapics especially since Enterprise is geniously computer generated while the Enterprise from the origional sereis one is a badly done model by todays standerd anyway.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Pah-Wraith
Sheikh


Joined: 30 Nov 2001
Posts: 6012
Location: Londonistan.

PostFri Sep 20, 2002 4:39 pm    

Yeah well i reckon a good explanation is the fact that they went through a dark age in between kirk and archer's timephrase

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Zefram Cochrane
Commodore


Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 1257
Location: Stafleet outpost 9876965 (aka Aberdeen,Scotland)

PostTue Sep 24, 2002 3:38 pm    

Better computer graphics! it would rubbish if they didnt use computer imaging!


-------signature-------

"So your all astronauts, on some sort of...Star Trek"



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
dickiedyce
Freshman Cadet


Joined: 27 Sep 2002
Posts: 5

PostFri Sep 27, 2002 11:59 am    Err... actually, maybe it isn't

Just thinking about the 'redesiged' NCC1701 that you see in the DS9 episode 'Trials & Tibble-ations'. It looked prety spiffy to me (and the nacelles did that new glowy effect just like the ones on the NX01).

How sad am I?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
The Hunter
Commodore


Joined: 31 Jul 2002
Posts: 1010
Location: Second Officer-Deep Space 10

PostSun Sep 29, 2002 8:33 pm    

just because of the real time Star Trek was made in like wut the 1970's and enterprise was made in 2001 the graphics just got ALOT better LOL


-------signature-------

"Ironic isn't it, our most elusive prey is our own creation." Hirogen Hunter-Flesh And Blood

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Deciviel
Captain


Joined: 27 Sep 2002
Posts: 508
Location: Joe's Garage

PostSun Sep 29, 2002 10:24 pm    

although it would be a tad strange if we saw kirk go back in time, you have to focus less on the graphics and more on the story.


-------signature-------

"Wheeee. Now say 'nuclear wessels'."

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostMon Sep 30, 2002 12:39 am    

is looks everything?


-------signature-------

~Tony Montana wrote:
You know what you need people like me people for you to snub your nose at and point at saying there is a bad man. Well guess what This bad man is leaving. Say goodnight to the BAD MAN!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Archon34
Commodore


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 1567
Location: U.S.S. Canada rulz

PostMon Dec 16, 2002 10:38 pm    

graphic inhancements duuuuuuuuuuh

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Zefram Cochrane
Commodore


Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 1257
Location: Stafleet outpost 9876965 (aka Aberdeen,Scotland)

PostThu Dec 19, 2002 3:45 pm    

..Cause it would look stupid to create it out of a washing up liquid bottle and flashy lights!


-------signature-------

"So your all astronauts, on some sort of...Star Trek"



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
43 of 50 Unit 6
Sophomore Cadet


Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 14

PostSat Dec 28, 2002 3:53 pm    

The only reason that it looks more advance is becuse our graphics generator has advanced more.


-------signature-------

The World Has To Many Morons!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
MikeyManVersion1
Lieutenant


Joined: 11 Feb 2002
Posts: 183
Location: U.S.S. Voyager

PostMon Dec 30, 2002 6:24 pm    

hahaha... ahhh yes, those thingys with lights and whizzers and funny buttns and noises! A "computer"! ahaha
j/p.... Friggin computer geek over here... 1st place any server at Counter-Strike... how sad.. Silly me... [note to self: get a life ] anywhoo!
Yes! Computers have made all the difference over the years... and thanks to all those wounderful technological countries across the world we have been able to upgrade from new to blah blah blah... blahdy blah... I don't know what I'm talking about anymore! Bye bye everyone!



-------signature-------

"Listen to me very carefully, because I'm only going to say this once. Coffee, black!" - Janeway to Replicator

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Mr. Pike
Lieutenant, Junior Grade


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 70

PostSun Jun 22, 2003 2:34 am    

Cut the crap man you know why!!! How about high tech advancements in film making!!! Or perhaps you'd prefer the cardboard sets of old.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostSun Jun 22, 2003 3:42 pm    

^ Yeah, I personally like Enterprise compared to today, it looks more like a submarine.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
sabertooth1217
UPN Boycotter


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 11484
Location: Texas

PostSun Jun 22, 2003 4:59 pm    

i so agree to that!!

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Interstelar_Concordium_CM
Captain


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 603
Location: A galaxy far far away....

PostSun Jun 22, 2003 8:40 pm    

well, the basic design is the same. Look at the nacells, or the bottom of the saucer. The only noticable difference is the windows, they are more animated than TOS Enterprise.


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
sabertooth1217
UPN Boycotter


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 11484
Location: Texas

PostSun Jun 22, 2003 8:52 pm    

Lt.BirdGod wrote:
^ Yeah, I personally like Enterprise compared to today, it looks more like a submarine.


it does look like a submarine


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
lennier1
Ensign, Junior Grade


Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 30
Location: Bavaria, Germany

PostMon Jun 23, 2003 3:47 am    

Some oil into the fire: http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/misc/enterprise_design_comment.htm

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
sabertooth1217
UPN Boycotter


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 11484
Location: Texas

PostFri Jun 27, 2003 6:31 pm    

because in the 60th it our computers count mkae ships look good
in the 2003 we can do almost anything so enterprise looks more advance but its not


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostMon Jun 30, 2003 7:41 pm    

I do agree with him, Enterprise could have been better while maintaining "Kirk's Style".

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com