Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:21 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
California "Sexual Indoctrination Bills"
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 4:27 pm    California "Sexual Indoctrination Bills"

Quote:
(CNSNews.com) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed what conservative activists call a "homosexual indoctrination" bill. But two other "gay agenda" bills await his veto pen, conservatives insist.

The bill vetoed on Wednesday, SB 1437, said California public schools may neither teach nor sponsor any activity that "reflects adversely" on anyone because of their sexual orientation.


Full Article

The first two bills I think are being skewed by opponents of the bills. I do see a need for the schools to prevent descrimination against homosexual students, and I don't think they should be teaching that the practice is either good or bad, it just is. Sponsoring an anti-gay club or some such is about as bad as sponsoring a racist club. However, the third bill gives me pause. I don't like the idea of mandatory classes on gender relations. I don't even like that my college requires one such class.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 4:33 pm    

Yeah, I don't like those things either, a madatory class on gender relations? /sighs. What are schools getting to.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
LightningBoy
Commodore


Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 1446
Location: Minnesota, U.S.A.

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 4:42 pm    

All that this bill would do would cause even more reason for overzealous activists to sue others.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 4:45 pm    

LightningBoy wrote:
All that this bill would do would cause even more reason for overzealous activists to sue others.


Which one, there 3.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 4:46 pm    

The only one that really should not be vetoed is AB 606

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 8:42 pm    

Thats not in the article...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 8:48 pm    

Ridiculous, all around. An anti-gay club, yes, is equal to racist, but there is no need, in my opinion, for gay rights education in the schools or homosexual education period. Once they hit Middle and High School I suppose it'd be good to try to put forth an idea of tolerance and acceptance of it, but lessons on it, or a class on it? Not a chance.

EDIT: I'm glad these bills were vetoed.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
teya
Commander


Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 423

PostFri Sep 08, 2006 8:51 pm    

I agree with the Governator on SB 1437--the wording was too vague.

As to the others... AB 606, I hope he signs. GBLT students need to be protected from discrimination in schools. But AB 1056 just introduces more mandatory "tolerance teaching," which has gotten absurd.

Honestly, if he signs 606, he'll get my vote in Nov. I didn't vote for Arnold the first time around, but the man has grown on me. Of course, what I like most are the things his party can't stand, but hey... he's a Californian first and a Republican second. He wants to do what he thinks right for the state--even when it breaks with his party's stand. That's refreshing.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSat Sep 09, 2006 12:45 am    

Republican_Man wrote:
Ridiculous, all around. An anti-gay club, yes, is equal to racist, but there is no need, in my opinion, for gay rights education in the schools or homosexual education period. Once they hit Middle and High School I suppose it'd be good to try to put forth an idea of tolerance and acceptance of it, but lessons on it, or a class on it? Not a chance.

EDIT: I'm glad these bills were vetoed.
There are religion electives...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat Sep 09, 2006 1:00 am    

Religious electives in the United States? They're not devoted to one religion, not as far as I know. They're mixed courses. But I don't believe we're talking about a homosexual elective, which would be a rather pointless course anyways.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSat Sep 09, 2006 11:14 am    

That's true...but my school's got an Islam elective...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat Sep 09, 2006 12:11 pm    

I thought you didn't live in the United States?


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 1:22 pm    

Umm....no...I live around SF.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 1:32 pm    

Huh. Why did I think you didn't live here?
And of course, that makes sense. Of course the San Francisco area would have an Islam elective. Does it have one for Christianity, the most prominent religion in the country?
And that's pretty rare in the US nonetheless, and doesn't provide justification for a class--particularly a required class--on tolerance for homosexuals and whatnot. But I suppose if a school wants to have an elective that's their choice, but the elective should not be forced on the schools by the government or made required for graduation.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 1:46 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
Huh. Why did I think you didn't live here?
And of course, that makes sense. Of course the San Francisco area would have an Islam elective. Does it have one for Christianity, the most prominent religion in the country?
And that's pretty rare in the US nonetheless, and doesn't provide justification for a class--particularly a required class--on tolerance for homosexuals and whatnot. But I suppose if a school wants to have an elective that's their choice, but the elective should not be forced on the schools by the government or made required for graduation.


Do you support the AB 606 one? Which would protect homosexual students from discrimination.


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 2:02 pm    

I suppose that one's okay, but I don't think it's really necessary to do that.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 3:42 pm    

It is. There is a lot of bullying about orientation at my school. It's sad.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 3:46 pm    

I'm surprised, considering you live near San Francisco, quite possibly the most liberal city in the nation. I live in a more conservative area of Colorado and I have yet to see any bullying whatsoever towards homosexuals.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 10:55 pm    

You shouldn't need extra laws though, schools are already supposed to have strict rules about discriminations (Enforcment is anoter story, belive me, I know)

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 11:49 pm    

Yeah. I live in a more conservative area. But, enforcement is one thing...

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Sep 10, 2006 11:55 pm    

It's like illegal immigration. We don't need more laws--we just need enforcement of those laws.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
WeAz
Commodore


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Where you aren't

PostMon Sep 11, 2006 8:47 pm    

Very true.

And we do have a Christianity elective.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com