Author |
Message |
Kyle Reese Cadet Gunnery Sergeant
Joined: 21 Apr 2003 Posts: 5672 Location: The United States of America
|
Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:12 am |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Would you rather they burned a gigantic Bush effigy? |
That's actually what I was suggesting. If they hate the President, fine. I don't care. But if they take their anger out on the entire country then I have problems.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:02 pm |
|
Kyle Reese wrote: | IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Would you rather they burned a gigantic Bush effigy? |
That's actually what I was suggesting. If they hate the President, fine. I don't care. But if they take their anger out on the entire country then I have problems. |
The same goes for me. It's wrong and horrifying to burn an effigy of the President, yes, but it's better than taking out your anger in a horribly negative, anti-American way on the American flag.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:42 pm |
|
Hitchhiker wrote: | Theresa wrote: | Limiting a persons right to speed 100 mph down the highway is still limiting a persons freedom, yet we do it. Limiting the age for tobacco and alcohol is also limiting freedoms. Sometimes it's justified. We've always been a democratic nation. If the majority rules... |
Speeding down a highway, tobacco, and alcohol are all activites or stimuli that can hurt someone else. Thus it's the nation's responsibility to protect everyone else by limiting those.
Burning a flag doesn't really hurt someone, unless one used the flag as some sort of flaming projectile, which would be both bad and cool to see at the same time. It is a valid political statement--maybe not a popular statement, but still, if someone wants to burn a flag, they should have the right to do it: it is their freedom of expression. Otherwise, the State is using politics to manipulate the law for their own purposes, and not for the greater expression of freedom. While it may be masqueraded as such, it is just a facade. |
In a country where it's ok to take an "mental health day"? Burning a flag may not hurt physically...
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
Lord Borg Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 11214 Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:31 pm |
|
Political opinions are one thing, but your doing a little more then having an "opinion" on a current "war" or what not when you BURN a flag, that has been used sense the begining of a country's time.
|
|
|
Micteth-Son of Udas Klingon Warrior
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 3202 Location: rite behind you!
|
Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:35 pm |
|
this is allready protected by the constituion in the frist amendement by a ruling of the supreme court in the case Texas Vs. Johnson in which a man burned a flag on the steps an offical building of the goverment in texas, was arrested, prosicuted, convicted(law at the time was no flag burning in texas), he apealed, a higher court in texas over turned and texas then brought the case to the supreme court
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:59 am |
|
You do know what an amendment is, right?
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:15 am |
|
Old flags should be recycled into reuseable shopping bags to save trees.
[quote]It's wrong and horrifying to burn an effigy of the President, yes, but it's better than taking out your anger in a horribly negative, anti-American way on the American flag.[/quote]
And you know how you're saying how it's awful to burn a flag in an angry attack on the people of america. I'd say it's better to burn a flag to get your anger out than go out and shoot the general public (and I know people who are so anti american that they'd gladly do this).
It's just a piece of fabric, and the only thing that makes it different from every other rectangle on fabric in the world is that you tie it to a pole and worship it as some sort of unholy idol.
It's just a rectangle. Detach yourself from the rectangle.
In the words of my favourite art terrorist:
[img]http://www.artofthestate.co.uk/photos/Banksy_flag_waving.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:20 am |
|
That's a pretty ridiculous statement, IMO.
BTW, no one, but you, compared burning a flag to shooting people... Thinking a flag is just a piece of cloth is ever so sad.
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:29 am |
|
How is it "sad" to be detached from a rectangle?
If not worshipping a colourful 2D shape tied to a stick makes me "sad" then I guess I'm "sad".
A flag represents everyone in your country, including all the murderers and conmen and all the bad in a country. I don't carry round a flag because I don't want to be united with people I don't want to be associated with. I'd never actually burn a flag because it's insensitive and disrespectful to flag worshippers (just like throwing eggs at churches or peeling off Sikh bumper stickers).
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:45 am |
|
Oh, yes, thank you for brining that up. I'd forgotten to address it.
How is respecting and honoring something "worshipping"?
I'm sure I don't know about how other nations view their flags, but in America, it doesn't just represent the land. It represents the people. All of the soldiers who have given their lives, all of the people who have taken this country, in less than 200 years, from infancy to a world power, etc... If by not associating youself with the "bad guys', you choose to disassociate yourself with the good ones, that's up to you. (But, by walking around as a human, you are associating yourself with other humans, good and bad...) And I've noticed that before, you've used avatars of people, musicians or whatever, that I'm sure other people use to represent themselves. Good and bad. But I guess that's ok?
Another main difference between the US and other countries. We weren't founded on a monarchy, or anything similar, but simply an ideal. And the flag represents that ideal, as well.
A flag is also a standard: Quote: | A flag, banner, or ensign, especially:
The ensign of a chief of state, nation, or city.
A long, tapering flag bearing heraldic devices distinctive of a person or corporation.
An emblem or flag of an army, raised on a pole to indicate the rallying point in battle.
The colors of a mounted or motorized military unit.
An object that under specified conditions defines, represents, or records the magnitude of a unit |
So, if to you, a flag is simply cloth with color, be detached. But for most of us, it's a symbol of our nation, and we aren't so "detached".
BTW, we don't rip pics from other sites, you either save them to photobucket or something, or simply link them. Your post has been edited to comply with this well established rule.
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:51 am |
|
Oops, I forgot about that rule. Sorry.
I won't do it again.
I won't deny that America has good in it, with all the wonderful things that have developed over there (Rock and roll, medical breakthroughs..etc) and all the amazing surprising things that people do everyday, but when I see the American flag flying I see a symbol of conflict, a superpower founded on blood and slavery. Flags just make me think of war and bad things, because I think flags are somehow... pompus and unnecessary.
Burning flags is to me, not an attack on the people of a nation, but on the pompusness and corruption of their establishment.
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:32 am |
|
Quote: | a superpower founded on blood and slavery. |
?
You do realize, that all things being equal, we had established slavery for the shortest amount of time, right? And it wasn't until the abolition of slavery that the US started growing exponentially.
As for the blood, it was our blood that it was founded on. I guess your answer to this may clear things up for me.
Do you see America as a bunch of white people?
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:06 pm |
|
A flag is just a piece of cloth though!
Yes, it may have special meaning. But it is still just a piece of cloth, and it is the utter pinnacle of capitalistic materialism to place the preservation of cloth over the freedom of human expression.
Human expression isn't worth much these days, of course. As history demonstrates rather depressingly, humans have happily waged war after war over trivial matters and symbols. Symbols are quite dangerous in that respect, since they can influence human actions so much.
What is a flag, anyway? What happens if someone has an American flag beach towel and chooses to burn that? Is that a crime? Or a t-shirt with the American flag on it? A realistic 3D computer simulation of someone burning a flag? The amendment is rather impractical in this regard.
Why not ban the swastika? Because people have a freedom to use it, to exhibit it, even though yes, it may offend people. But now, to tell people that they don't have the right to freely express their discontent by burning the flag is Anti-American. It goes against what the flag stands for: freedom and liberty.
When freedom of expression dies, so too dies liberty and harmony. No longer can people feel like they are the creators of their own destiny, because suddenly they are able to see the yoke that, up until now, was invisible and easy to forget.
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:15 pm |
|
Take a look around you. Does it seem that anyone knows their limits anymore? Slamming planes into the WTC and the Pentagon was AQ's "freedom of expression". In a society that doesn't know when to stop, should the "yoke" be visible? I'd think so. Is that my decision to make? Nope, society is making that decision all by themselves.
A flag itself may be made of a piece of cloth. But that is not what it is. It's the representation of a nation. Sometimes a representation of the soul of a nation. If you don't have a problem with someone walking all over your nation, that's fine. That's up to you. I, however, do have a problem with it. I've posted this ages ago, 80% or so of my family is military. They fought, and some gave their lives to protect what that flag represents. When you walk on it, burn it, spit on it, spurn it, you are doing it to them, not to a piece of cloth. The people burning it don't consider it just a 3'x5' piece of cloth, or they wouldn't be burning it, now would they? They see the stars and stripes as America. Their only purpose in what they do is to incite anger and hostility.
American's in general must have more of a respect for a nations flag than most, I'd have to assume. I don't think I've ever seen a news report, that I can recall, where an American is demonstrating by burning an Israeli flag, etc... I'm sure you can google and find one for me, but the fact that you had to search for it would only go to prove my point.
(You does not only refer to HH, but to anyone. [yes, some comments were in direct answer, but those should be clear])
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
Micteth-Son of Udas Klingon Warrior
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 3202 Location: rite behind you!
|
Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:40 pm |
|
im reply to Theresa:
in the court case i mentioned earlier, the guy who was burning the flag was doing it to protest the regan administration, not against those who died for america, yes the flag does represent america, and i see you point, it is a valid one, but this issue is like abortion , some for the law, some not, and i say debating it will not gett anything proven.
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:47 pm |
|
Quote: | As for the blood, it was our blood that it was founded on. I guess your answer to this may clear things up for me. |
The blood of the native Americans, the vietmanese... they made you a superpower. You hop round the globe forcing "democracy" on everyone, this stupid western democracy where we're not even allowed to vote on whether we should go to war! We just vote in a idiot to make decisions for us, instead of voting on decisions ourselves!
And freedom of expression is already illegal. If we truely had freedom of expression, we'd be able to change the grey concrete streets into a menagerie of colours and quotes and life. But we can't.
There is no freedom of expression and no liberty any more.
Hitchhiker
Quote: | it is the utter pinnacle of capitalistic materialism to place the preservation of cloth over the freedom of human expression |
That is what I've been trying to say. You put it perfectly.
|
|
|
Founder Dominion Leader
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
|
Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:25 pm |
|
madlilnerd wrote: | Quote: | As for the blood, it was our blood that it was founded on. I guess your answer to this may clear things up for me. |
The blood of the native Americans, the vietmanese... they made you a superpower. You hop round the globe forcing "democracy" on everyone, this stupid western democracy where we're not even allowed to vote on whether we should go to war! We just vote in a idiot to make decisions for us, instead of voting on decisions ourselves!
The blood of native Americans? Vietnamese? What are you talking about? Native Americans make sense, but Vietnamese? And no, none of those nations made us a super power.
I mean no offense and say this as delicately as I can, but I'd appreciate it if you did not insult this country, especially in matters pertaining to genocide. I love England and respect it, but that country literally wrote the book on genocide. Anything America does on war and genocide, we got from England.
"stupid western democracy"? As opposed to what? Crappy eastern European, east Asian, or South American communism? Countries where you literally die if you speak out against the government? Countries that are in utter poverty. Countries that don't have half the luxuries as us. Western Democracy is not the pinaccle of evil that you make it out to be.
Actually...we are allowed to vote if we can go to war...
And freedom of expression is already illegal. If we truly had freedom of expression, we'd be able to change the grey concrete streets into a menagerie of colours and quotes and life. But we can't.
There is no freedom of expression and no liberty any more.
You equate freedom of expression with changing the colors of the streets? Ok....lets make something clear. (BTW, I'm only speaking for America, I won't speak for any other western nations) When our forefathers died, they did not mean "Freedom to do whatever the hell you want!" as you're under the impression that is what they meant. That is called chaos and anarchy. They simply wanted freedom to live their lives without a tyrant telling them what to do. Freedom of expression comes with responsibility. I'm sorry, but changing the color of the streets is...not freedom of expression. That is not what people died for.
Hitchhiker
Quote: | it is the utter pinnacle of capitalistic materialism to place the preservation of cloth over the freedom of human expression |
That is what I've been trying to say. You put it perfectly. |
Where you see cloth, people see the representation of nations...
|
|
|
PrankishSmart Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002 Posts: 4779 Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:30 am |
|
Flag burning is what freedom of speech is though it doesn't matter if you or I disagree with it. If the flag was property of someone else it's obvious vandalism, just like colouring the concrete, but it should not go more than that with the law IN MY OPINION.
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:03 am |
|
Is there any other 'object' other than the flag that we're told how to take care of in the constitution? (That we can all own as personal property)
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm |
|
My take on the issue is summed up in two words: Red Herring.
All it is is an effort to energize the Republican base. I have not heard of major issues involving flag burning. Nearly all of the major issues I've heard of/seen have had the Republican party on the defensive: this puts them on the offensive.
I belive that American flag deserves a certain amount of respect, but my opinion is that is deserves more that to be a cheap plastic decoration for a car.
I also think that there are much more time sensitive and critical issues that Congress needs to deal with right now.
|
|
|
CJ Cregg Commodore
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 1254
|
|
|
Starbuck faster...
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 8715 Location: between chaos and melody
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:52 pm |
|
I think this is a waste of time, because now demonstrators are just going to burn flags with one or two people and say they're disposing of it. Its not going to stop anyone from doing anything, so why bother? There have been many valid arguments in here. People DIED for our right to wave that flag and call it ours, but is banning it really going to do anything?
|
|
|
Cathexis The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001 Posts: 5901 Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:50 pm |
|
Hitchhiker wrote: | Why not ban the swastika? |
Well, schools in this country have been known to punish students who carve the swastika into their desks or spray paint it on the walls of school buildings. Does that count ? In Germany, the swastika has actually been banned/illegalized--I wonder why. It saddens me, because that symbol, if flipped or turned around, is a Native American representation of peace and long life.
Anyway, I see this discussion is merely a debate of the significance of symbols and what they represent, not necessarily a debate over only the American flag but flags in general. Personally, not being a native-born American myself, I still have a great amount of respect for the flag of this country. Why ? Because this flag represents the freedom she has granted me to live and work here in the United States of America.
I will always view a flag as a symbol of the nation it represents. I agree with Theresa wholeheartedly on that. Yes, it is made of cloth. Yes, it can be burned. I remember vividly on September 11th watching the news just when the second tower was hit. Shortly after seeing this, the news anchors cut to footage of Middle Eastern people tossing American flags into the dirt, dousing them in gasoline, and lighting them on fire.
To me, this was a cold, cruel-hearted slap in the face of a nation founded on the principles of peace and freedom. Yet, I could understand the anger those people felt, and perhaps still feel. Perhaps they feel that the United States is trying to impose its Democratic and Capitalistic values on other societies. Perhaps they find America to be offensive and dangerous, almost too much of a super power. Perhaps they are afraid that this country will become a dictatorial entity, just like AQ and the Taliban....just like Hussein and Bin Laden.
Even though I may feel disappointment regarding the current presidential administration of this country at the moment, it angers me to see that other Americans would be so enraged as to burn the flag of their country. It seems to be an act of denouncement. When I see Americans throwing flags into the dirt, dousing them in gasoline, and lighting them on fire....I feel as though they do not believe in peace and democracy.
Flags, in my opinion, may be cloth, but they represent the heart of the nation they fly over...and this country may be flawed, but my family brought me here for a reason.....out of desperation, with hope in their hearts. And yes, I find flaws in the governing of this country everyday. But in France, it is no different. In England, it is no different. In Sweden, it is no different.
Every country is flawed. But every country has something that another does not offer, something unique and culturally fascinating.
The flag, by definition, was meant to represent a country during wartime/battles.....it began as a signal of surrender. So if some people wish to view flags as a symbol of battle, blood, and war...so be it.
Wikipedia.org wrote: | Flags were initially created for signalling, such as semaphore, and for the identification of those who displayed them, and are still used for that purpose today. |
Source
We are all free to our opinions about what a flag does or does not mean, but if you look back into tradition and history, perhaps it will serve as a reminder of what the intentions behind such a device have been and are today. To burn a flag in protest, imo, is to cry out in protest of the country and what it stands for.
If the flag is simply a piece of meaningless cloth, what would be the purpose of burning it ? If it is truly non-symbolical, why attach to it affectionate nicknames such as Old Glory and The Stars and Stripes ? I would react the same way if I saw someone burning the Tricolore, the national flag of France....
I think it is about respect. A flag is a representation of the presence of a unique people. It is a symbol of both the history of a country, which for all countries of this world marred by blood and war, slavery and discontent, and the principles of a country.
It is more, and by saying that I do not mean to defend terrorists or Middle Eastern people, understandable to me that people in third-world countries see the United States as dangerous, an entity that frightens and angers them because of its powerful standing in the world. The flag, being a powerful symbol of the nation, is therefore the perfect target of their anger. They know it impacts us. I can see where this anger would drive them to denounce the United States by burning American flags. But for native-born Americans, I simply cannot understand how anger toward the President, or toward the government, can marr one's patriotism so much that he/she would denounce his/her homeland.
Home is home, whether it is flawed or perfect. And we know that there is no perfect country. Perfection is both subjective and unattainable.
Spencer Tracy wrote: | The law is the law, whether it's good or bad. If it's bad, the thing to do is to change it ! |
This can be applied to nations around the world.
Governments around the world are corrupt. Leaders make mistakes and their people pay the price. Sometimes, most of the time, that price can be too high. And no one says it is easy to change the corrupt governing of a country to provide for the ethical and moral freedoms of a people. I mean, if America is sooo corrupt....if Bush and his administration is so corrupt, how come he's serving a second term in office ? If you don't like Bush, and you didn't vote, consider the possibility that non-participation in an election of any scale of magnitude, means you are relinquishing your right to having a say in the governing of the country in which you live.
I know I'm drifting, but I think it's important to point this out to anyone who disagrees with me.
This is not about materialism.
If flags are only cloth and nothing more, than what are nations ?
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|