Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:02 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Woman Tried for Severing Baby's Arms Found Not Guilty By Ins
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostMon Apr 17, 2006 5:48 pm    

ummm....... the woman had a tumor for crying out loud. And it takes a lot less than 30 days in an institution for them to tell if you're genuinely insane or not. It takes them about a week. I've been there enough times to know how it works. I'm not saying what she did was right, but.... if she was mentally unstable... come on.....

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostMon Apr 17, 2006 5:57 pm    

Of course it could also be argued that anyone who'd do such a thing could be ruled clinically unstable. No one in their "right mind" is going to harm anyone else. Much less a defenseless infant.


-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostMon Apr 17, 2006 9:06 pm    

Well, they didn't find Andrea Yates (or at least I think that's her name) insane, so there's clearly a system.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostTue Apr 18, 2006 3:52 am    

Theresa wrote:
Of course it could also be argued that anyone who'd do such a thing could be ruled clinically unstable. No one in their "right mind" is going to harm anyone else. Much less a defenseless infant.


No. You have some crimes driven by a motive or motives, and other crimes driven purely by an induviduals medical condition.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
magenta
Commander


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 404
Location: AUSTRALIA

PostTue Apr 18, 2006 3:54 am    

A failed system,she should have been executed too!What a horrible person she is along with any baby or child torturer or/and murderer.
THE DEATH PENALTY!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostTue Apr 18, 2006 4:20 am    

magenta wrote:
A failed system,she should have been executed too!What a horrible person she is along with any baby or child torturer or/and murderer.
THE DEATH PENALTY!


magenta wrote:
THATS ALL I WILL SAY ON THE MATTER!


?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostTue Apr 18, 2006 5:40 pm    

PrankishSmart wrote:
Theresa wrote:
Of course it could also be argued that anyone who'd do such a thing could be ruled clinically unstable. No one in their "right mind" is going to harm anyone else. Much less a defenseless infant.


No. You have some crimes driven by a motive or motives, and other crimes driven purely by an induviduals medical condition.



Yes, then it's called temporary insanity. I'm not arguing there was something wrong with the woman, I'm just saying there are too many excuses made for people these days. Blame society, etc...



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostTue Apr 18, 2006 5:42 pm    

Theresa wrote:
PrankishSmart wrote:
Theresa wrote:
Of course it could also be argued that anyone who'd do such a thing could be ruled clinically unstable. No one in their "right mind" is going to harm anyone else. Much less a defenseless infant.


No. You have some crimes driven by a motive or motives, and other crimes driven purely by an induviduals medical condition.



Yes, then it's called temporary insanity. I'm not arguing there was something wrong with the woman, I'm just saying there are too many excuses made for people these days. Blame society, etc...


Well said, in many cases, during the observatoin, the person is convenietnly, no longer insane thus, no punishment for the crime


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2, 3
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com