Author |
Message |
Lt.BirdGod Captain
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 619 Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun
|
Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:08 pm |
|
Now, we all know (or at least most of us) that how the Replicator creates food, they transform Energy into Matter. Now, why can't they do that with a person? It would be a form of cloning. Just input the specifications, and hit "REPLICATE". Wouldn't you clone the person, and their brain patterns? They would think alike wouldn't they? (Then don't give me the BS on how cloning is immoral or whatever)
|
|
|
Dr. Jetrel Rear Admiral
Joined: 21 Dec 2001 Posts: 4705
|
Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:15 pm |
|
I think a human is more complicated then for example a bread but in theorie i think it would be possible
|
|
|
Chikotay Ensign
Joined: 05 Feb 2002 Posts: 66 Location: Starbase 1832
|
Thu Feb 28, 2002 6:40 am |
|
Present replicator technology works only for small, simple objects.
Theoretically, if a larger,more complex object were to be synthesised, the about of internuclear energy that would have to be overcome would be too great. There would be a molecular breakdown of the object as soon as it is replicated.
That's why starfleet can't replicate entire starships and crafts, and certainly not a human body, at least not till now.
|
|
|
Lt.BirdGod Captain
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 619 Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun
|
Thu Feb 28, 2002 6:53 pm |
|
Well, that sucks
|
|
|
Chikotay Ensign
Joined: 05 Feb 2002 Posts: 66 Location: Starbase 1832
|
Fri Mar 01, 2002 7:10 am |
|
True.....
|
|
|
LanariaRayton Rear Admiral
Joined: 28 Feb 2002 Posts: 3406 Location: Alternate reality in multiple dimentions
|
Fri Mar 01, 2002 11:34 pm |
|
|
|
|
eyirs Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Oct 2001 Posts: 196 Location: Dying Stars of Vector Quadrant
|
Mon Mar 04, 2002 4:03 am |
|
Well see firstly creating a cup of coffee or a weapon well it just have non organic moving parts but in the case of human well there are a complex neural pathways which are probably difficult to replicate by a computer and the main thing is about giving life which i think a replicator cannot provide
-------signature-------
Abhishek it sounds very Apt.
|
|
|
MT39503 Commodore
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 1437 Location: AZ
|
Fri May 31, 2002 10:37 am |
|
Lt.BirdGod wrote: | Now, we all know (or at least most of us) that how the Replicator creates food, they transform Energy into Matter. Now, why can't they do that with a person? It would be a form of cloning. Just input the specifications, and hit "REPLICATE". Wouldn't you clone the person, and their brain patterns? They would think alike wouldn't they? (Then don't give me the BS on how cloning is immoral or whatever) |
Theortically, if you had a complex enough computer and large enough repicator you could. However, anything in Star Trek is far from this. The only exectption is the transporter. A transporter is bascially a replicator execpt the fact that is decompiles already existing matter. In on TNG episode, they transport the Doc (Not Beverely the other one - I can't remember her name) out of the terriable sickness she had. Bascially, they replicated a new doc. This is the best example I can think of, enjoy!
|
|
|
admiral Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 24 Sep 2002 Posts: 252 Location: bridge of U.S.S Akira
|
Fri Sep 27, 2002 9:22 am |
|
a replicator is just a machine i don't think it can replicate living cells
|
|
|
|