Friendly Star Trek Discussions Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:15 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Matter--energy stream
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek Tech This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostWed Feb 27, 2002 4:08 pm    

Now, we all know (or at least most of us) that how the Replicator creates food, they transform Energy into Matter. Now, why can't they do that with a person? It would be a form of cloning. Just input the specifications, and hit "REPLICATE". Wouldn't you clone the person, and their brain patterns? They would think alike wouldn't they? (Then don't give me the BS on how cloning is immoral or whatever)

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Dr. Jetrel
Rear Admiral


Joined: 21 Dec 2001
Posts: 4705

PostWed Feb 27, 2002 4:15 pm    

I think a human is more complicated then for example a bread but in theorie i think it would be possible


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Chikotay
Ensign


Joined: 05 Feb 2002
Posts: 66
Location: Starbase 1832

PostThu Feb 28, 2002 6:40 am    

Present replicator technology works only for small, simple objects.
Theoretically, if a larger,more complex object were to be synthesised, the about of internuclear energy that would have to be overcome would be too great. There would be a molecular breakdown of the object as soon as it is replicated.
That's why starfleet can't replicate entire starships and crafts, and certainly not a human body, at least not till now.




View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lt.BirdGod
Captain


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 619
Location: Sol System, 3rd planet from the Sun

PostThu Feb 28, 2002 6:53 pm    

Well, that sucks


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Chikotay
Ensign


Joined: 05 Feb 2002
Posts: 66
Location: Starbase 1832

PostFri Mar 01, 2002 7:10 am    

True.....

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
LanariaRayton
Rear Admiral


Joined: 28 Feb 2002
Posts: 3406
Location: Alternate reality in multiple dimentions

PostFri Mar 01, 2002 11:34 pm    



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
eyirs
Lieutenant


Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 196
Location: Dying Stars of Vector Quadrant

PostMon Mar 04, 2002 4:03 am    

Well see firstly creating a cup of coffee or a weapon well it just have non organic moving parts but in the case of human well there are a complex neural pathways which are probably difficult to replicate by a computer and the main thing is about giving life which i think a replicator cannot provide



-------signature-------

Abhishek it sounds very Apt.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
MT39503
Commodore


Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 1437
Location: AZ

PostFri May 31, 2002 10:37 am    

Lt.BirdGod wrote:
Now, we all know (or at least most of us) that how the Replicator creates food, they transform Energy into Matter. Now, why can't they do that with a person? It would be a form of cloning. Just input the specifications, and hit "REPLICATE". Wouldn't you clone the person, and their brain patterns? They would think alike wouldn't they? (Then don't give me the BS on how cloning is immoral or whatever)


Theortically, if you had a complex enough computer and large enough repicator you could. However, anything in Star Trek is far from this. The only exectption is the transporter. A transporter is bascially a replicator execpt the fact that is decompiles already existing matter. In on TNG episode, they transport the Doc (Not Beverely the other one - I can't remember her name) out of the terriable sickness she had. Bascially, they replicated a new doc. This is the best example I can think of, enjoy!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
admiral
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 24 Sep 2002
Posts: 252
Location: bridge of U.S.S Akira

PostFri Sep 27, 2002 9:22 am    

a replicator is just a machine i don't think it can replicate living cells

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com