Friendly Star Trek Discussions Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:19 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Series Names
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> General Star Trek Discussion This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
StarfleetCommand74656
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 653
Location: On STV

PostTue Aug 01, 2006 12:52 pm    Series Names

The latest series of ST are all named after the ships/starbases they took place on (DS9, VOY, ENT). A common solution, but it strikes me as a bit... boring. I think DS9 suited it, as did VOY, but ENT could've been Star Trek: Beginnings, or Star Trek: First Frontier, or something. I had one called Star Trek: Starfleet Commandoes- anything to add?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostTue Aug 01, 2006 12:56 pm    

It depends on your main storyline. I had fan fics/RPG's set in the Mirror Universe. Instead of naming it after the ship, I gave it a twisty name, similar to the naming scheme of the episodes for trek,

Examples
Inverted Morality
Inverted Images

that sort of thing. They name it what people can Identify with the most. Hence naming it after a ship/station (Though bear in mind, TNG and TOS did not do that)


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Voyager2004
Commodore


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA

PostTue Aug 01, 2006 11:05 pm    

Ya. I agree with LB. There was Star Trek TNG, obviously...

But DS9 did suit it's title. They're deep out there. Large space station...

Voyager suited its title as well. They were Voyagers. Making a long Voyage home. Kind of ironic that the ship's name somehow described the crew...LOL...

But I would have to agree with you about Enterprise. Because as it has been put out many times by the producers and such from Trek, "Enterprise was to show us the beginning of the Federation. How it all started, and our early interactions with the Vulcans..." and such.



-------signature-------

"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
StarfleetCommand74656
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 653
Location: On STV

PostMon Sep 11, 2006 12:31 pm    

I agree about Voyager. But somehow I think Star Trek: Voyagers (note the plural) would have been better

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Voyager2004
Commodore


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA

PostTue Sep 12, 2006 4:23 am    

No. I disagree completely. Because the ship's name was just "Voyager." Now, yes the crew were "voyagers," but it was to be named after the ship, and the ship's name itself, described their journey. The whole point of the show.


-------signature-------

"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Untitled
Commander


Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 396
Location: abandoned

PostSat Sep 16, 2006 2:34 am    Re: Series Names

StarfleetCommand74656 wrote:
The latest series of ST are all named after the ships/starbases they took place on (DS9, VOY, ENT). A common solution, but it strikes me as a bit... boring.

- I agree; that they were boring...but ---While I think a title is very important, with Star Trek I can see why they did it the way they did.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
John Luck Pickard
Lieutenant


Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 150
Location: Orange Co., NY

PostMon Sep 25, 2006 12:32 am    

The only bad title of the 4 "modern" series was indeed Enterprise. Not to mention that being a bad name for the ship (because continuity of the name Enterprise was way thrown off), it was way too busy a term in the franchise to have it refer to a specific series.


-------signature-------

"Is there a John Luck Pickard here"?, -Q, Tapestry

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com