Author |
Message |
Sam Kenobi Not a Duke
Joined: 13 Jun 2003 Posts: 10373 Location: The 'Verse
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:23 am Hannibal Lecter Trilogy |
|
I just got done watching Red Dragon. I've seen Silence of the Lambs and will probably watch Hannibal tomorrow. I was surprised with both RD and SotL... I gues I thought SotL would be a lot freakier and it wasn't. So I went into watching RD with the thought that it wouldn't be too bad either, but I really think it was a lot creepier than SotL. As for Hannibal, I got the book when I was probably...14 and read the first 2 chapters before I was done being creeped out. Is Hannibal the worst of the trilogy? What are your opinions?
Last edited by Sam Kenobi on Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Sevenofninenz Commodore
Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 2441 Location: New Zealand Penal Colony
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 2:29 am |
|
I've only seen Silence of the Lambs, and all I have to say is: The book is soooo much better, even the Red Dragon book looks better.
-------signature-------
"The men cheered. The women fainted. The children waved multi-coloured flags!" - AT
My LJ
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:26 am |
|
'Hannibal' is definitly better than 'Red Dragon' becasue Hannibal Lecter is out of prison in that one. Hannibal is great being a loose psychopath in Paris (or was it rome?).
Too bad Jodie forster doesn't play Clarice Starling, but Julliane Moore is a good one too.
'Silence of the Lambs' is still the best one though.
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:31 am |
|
I saw them in the order SOTL- Hannibal - Red dragon But I thought they were good anyway. I liked SOTL the best, after that red dragon, hannibal as last one. Just because they don't follow the book in the last movie, I didn't like that.
-------signature-------
Nosce te ipsum
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:41 pm |
|
I read "Silence of the Lambs" last year. It's an amazing book, and the movie is great, too. I wouldn't classify it as horror, so I don't think it's really meant to scare you. More of a psych thriller. I've read "Red Dragon" as well, but I haven't seen the movie. "Hannibal" is next.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Sam Kenobi Not a Duke
Joined: 13 Jun 2003 Posts: 10373 Location: The 'Verse
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:09 pm |
|
I just finished the trilogy with Hannibal last night and though the gore kind of aspect of Hannibal was very well crafted to gross and creep you out, I'll have to say that my favorite of all of them is Red Dragon. I don't know, that one just gave me the creeps a little more than the others. But they're all very good, I'm disappointed that I waited so long to watch them.
|
|
|
Siege Commander
Joined: 31 Oct 2004 Posts: 447
|
Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:05 pm |
|
Watch Manhunter.
|
|
|
Untitled Commander
Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 396 Location: abandoned
|
Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:52 am |
|
Siege wrote: | Watch Manhunter. |
- I hated Brian Cox's Lecter, I think Edward Norton totally ripped off Petersen's portrayal of Graham. Petersen makes this movie shine, is the far better Graham.
Interesting enough main actor from L&O (Dennis Farina) and the main actor from CSI (William Petersen) star in this flick.
|
|
|
MakeItSo Commander
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 406 Location: Somewhere in California
|
Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:25 am |
|
Sevenofninenz wrote: | I've only seen Silence of the Lambs, and all I have to say is: The book is soooo much better, even the Red Dragon book looks better. |
Yeah I thought hthat Silence of the Lambs was the best movie, followed by Red Dragon. I thought the Hannibal movie wasn't that good because of the gore. I thought it was too much "shock value." But I do agree, the Silence of the Lambs as a book was so much better. Red Dragon was good too, the serial killer is even freakier in the book. I never read Hannibal though, due to what I heard about the ending which they changed for the movie since so many people didn't like the original book's ending. That was a huge reason why Jodie Foster decided not to play in that movie, because they had originally wanted the book's ending, but decided to change it but it was too late because they had already cast Julianne Moore in the part. I really like Jodie Foster though.
|
|
|
Kilgore Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 86 Location: Sector 001
|
Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:16 am |
|
In my oppinion HANNIBAL (the movie) is the worst of all 4 Lecter movies. I even read all the books, so I liek the series even though I dislike Hannibal (the movie).
Manhunter I like a lot because it was set at a slower pace and I think the actors did a great job. Both Petersen, Farina, Cox & Noonan delivered some great performances.
Silence of the lambs is still the best one however, but I think the way Hannibal escaped is a bit lame. Everyone in this movie do amazing jobs. Hopkins, Foster, Glenn & Levine were great.
Hannibal was a terrible movie. They went completely overboard and both the movie as well as the book completely loose it when portraying Hannibal Lecter. It seems like he is completely impossible to defeat and all he needs is the red cape in order to fly. Hannibal is definately a character that works better when behind bars or walls of unbreakable glass. Also Julianne Moore never worked for me.
Red Dragon was ok, but I never believed in Norton, even though he is one of my favourite actors, as Graham. Petersen did a better job as Graham as he seemed more like the tired, experienced and tough detective. Watson as always did a great job but the movie seemed to Hollywoodish if you know what I mean.
-------signature-------
"And he piled upon the whale's white hump, the sum of all the rage and hate felt by his whole race. If his chest had been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it."
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|