Author |
Message |
Coyote_finn Freshman Cadet
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 9
|
Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:01 pm Weapons, tactics and suchlike |
|
I was directed here by some people on B3ta, who were getting upset with my questions.
Honestly I thought that there would be a star trek fan or two on there.
As I am not a star trek fan, but find myself being forced to watch it when other people want it on.
I have some questions about the whole weapons malarkey.
Right it is the year 3000 or whatever, they seem to be able to beam people and make food, equipment etc out of nothing.
Yet their weapons are useless in a combat situation.
I was watching some episode of DS9 and they were taking on those ugly guys with the big heads, I think they are called Jemmardar or somthing like that.
The Humans had a great defensive postion and the uglies charged them in a pack with plenty of warning they were on their way.
Then the ray guns or whatever they are called were fired and immediatly gave away where the humans were hiding.
They only took one ugly out at a time and seemed to have a very slow fire rate.
If the humans had taken a couple of automatic rifles or even a ww1 machine gun, said uglies would have been taken out in a matter of seconds.
As a result uglies were able to charge humans uphill and kill a fair few.
Brings me to that film about the Borg.
They walk down corridors and make no attempt to get out of the way.
They adapt to the ray guns and then become unstoppable.
However patrick stewart took some out with a tommy gun.
That alien with the big head who acts like a viking or somthing takes them on with his gothy sword and wins.
They all seemed to have an issue with how limited their rayguns were.
So why did'nt they just go and make some machine guns with their stuff making machines and shoot all of the borg dead.
Even a few pikes or spears would have been more effective.
Again it brings me to the point that they have this so effective technology but when it comes to war they are not very good at it.
Hell, most human technology seems to be making more effective ways of killing each other, even if they don't like to make war any more they must have come across better weaponary along the way.
|
|
|
Coyote_finn Freshman Cadet
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 9
|
Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:06 pm |
|
oh and dont say anything about the borg adapting to machine guns, surely they already would have adapted to swords and being thrown about.
I realise those ray guns shoot some kind of energy/light beam.
And it does not explain how bad they have become at tactics, despite having all human history, ie Napoleon, Julius caeser, gengis khan and every great generals notes etc at their disposal.
|
|
|
IntrepedII Captain
Joined: 21 Jun 2002 Posts: 1476 Location: Belgium
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:25 pm |
|
you are correct on most aspects, but you have to take in account that the federation is not a warlike orginazation, they do carry and make weapons but they are for their own protection and are also not made with the purpose of killing as effectively possible, they are made with the intention of stunning/disabeling without the letality of it + a federation phaser has more uses then simply being a defence weapon, its more like a universal tool, they can use it to lit fires, digging tunnels, heck they can even make a forcefield with it.
So when you say that the weaponry isnt very effective i agree, just remember it wasnt made for the sole purpose of killing.
in answer of yer borg question, the tommy gun used by picard was used inside the holodeck--> outside the holodeck the weapon would disappear
the alien with the big head ak 'Worf' is a klingon and their strength is superiour to that of a human, meaning he has more of a chance to defeat a borg in hand to hand, remember that the physical strenght of a borg also alot greater is then that of a human ...
in closing, remember thats its a tv show so there are bound to be a few mistakes out there, try to overlook them and just enjoy the show
-------signature-------
Im a Jedi, SO DONT PISS ME OFF!!
|
|
|
Captain CB Captain
Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 587 Location: U.S.S Retribution
|
Mon Feb 09, 2004 2:39 pm |
|
if you ask me phasors are far morer effective
i mean can a pistol vaporize rock and can a pike stun people
so there a phasor is better
|
|
|
Coyote_finn Freshman Cadet
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 9
|
Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:26 pm well still answers no questions. |
|
well a phaser is usless then.
Wh40k describes a war against aliens who have thier soul intention to destroy the human race.
I have seen ds9 and stng or whatever the hell it is called and that fat man with the beard, and patrick stewart have defeated kilgons bear handed.
Basically the trekkies have realised that thier weapons idea is pathetic.
Personally given free reign with a few aks and a gmpg I could take over the enterprise and then go on to defeat some borg.
you have not indicated why their ray guns are any more effective than a ww1 machine gun or why they are so crap at military tactics.
no wonder the jemmadar and the ferengi kick seven bells of *beep* out of the human.
|
|
|
Coyote_finn Freshman Cadet
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 9
|
Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:28 pm |
|
bollocks to stunning people,
the whole point of a pike is to kill the bastard before they kill you.
Check.
Bosina 1994
basically star trek has no idea. at least wh40k has a reasonalble Idea of how humans are with aliens and aliens are with humans.
|
|
|
Coyote_finn Freshman Cadet
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 9
|
Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:31 pm |
|
oh and jedI?
I fight for the Irish navy,
I will see you in vallhalla.
|
|
|
IntrepedII Captain
Joined: 21 Jun 2002 Posts: 1476 Location: Belgium
|
Tue Feb 10, 2004 9:38 am |
|
err yeah ok, whatever byeee
-------signature-------
Im a Jedi, SO DONT PISS ME OFF!!
|
|
|
Captain CB Captain
Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 587 Location: U.S.S Retribution
|
Tue Feb 10, 2004 11:48 am Re: well still answers no questions. |
|
Coyote_finn wrote: | well a phaser is usless then.
Wh40k describes a war against aliens who have thier soul intention to destroy the human race.
I have seen ds9 and stng or whatever the hell it is called and that fat man with the beard, and patrick stewart have defeated kilgons bear handed.
Basically the trekkies have realised that thier weapons idea is pathetic.
Personally given free reign with a few aks and a gmpg I could take over the enterprise and then go on to defeat some borg.
you have not indicated why their ray guns are any more effective than a ww1 machine gun or why they are so crap at military tactics.
no wonder the jemmadar and the ferengi kick seven bells of *beep* out of the human. |
I have indixted why they are effective
Because they can stun people
If you were fighting a war and civiians were mixrd in with the enemy would you use a instant kill weapon
|
|
|
Achilles Commodore
Joined: 12 Nov 2002 Posts: 1718 Location: Flibdor
|
Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:57 pm |
|
IntrepedII wrote: | you are correct on most aspects, but you have to take in account that the federation is not a warlike orginazation, they do carry and make weapons but they are for their own protection and are also not made with the purpose of killing as effectively possible |
That's very true, but I totally agree with Coyote_finn on his assessment of the battle with the Jem'Hadar. Desperate times mean desperate measures and the need to adopt different tactics. Maybe the Federation aren't a warlike organization, but they sure as hell don't have a choice when it comes to fighting the Dominion, so it would really seem like common sense to use a far more effective weapon than a phaser. I can't imagine it would be hard for Starfleet tactical to look up some information on old earth weapons and then produce/replicate a few hundred thousand 'machine gun' style weapons for the war. It would make ground combat so much easier for the Federation .. that is until the Dominion start producing similar weapons of their own. Just imagine what it would be like to see Sisko using a P-90 'Jack O'Neill' style to take down loads of Jem'Hadar during the siege on AR558 .. it would be quality! (well at least I think so)
I also think the more warlike Starfleet ships, such as Defiant-class and Prometheus-class, should have those types of weapons onboard as they'd be much more effective in combat situations.
|
|
|
imzadi76 Commander
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 367 Location: Pittsburgh - PA - USA - Earth - Sector001 - Alpha Quadrant
|
Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:31 am |
|
One thing that always bothered me about the phasers is that sometimes they use features that they never mention in other episodes.
Phasers are supposed to have a wide range setting - it's been used in several episodes to knock out whole roomfulls of people. They very seldom use or mention this feature of the phaser. why?
There's also been incidents where they used the ships' phasers to knock out whole city blocks of people. I remember then using this feature in the TOS episode "A Piece of the Action."
Anybody else recall any instances of wide-range phaser use?
-------signature-------
Live long and prosper
|
|
|
Captain Digness Commander
Joined: 04 Dec 2003 Posts: 418
|
Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:08 pm |
|
I have the answer for you and its a genius one. Due to the gravitational forces of spce a bullet wouldn't work so phasr is needed.
-------signature-------
Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.
|
|
|
imzadi76 Commander
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 367 Location: Pittsburgh - PA - USA - Earth - Sector001 - Alpha Quadrant
|
Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:41 pm |
|
bullets and explosives would work great in space, probably even better than they do on Earth because there's no air or gravity to pull the bullet off course, and explosives (like gunpowder) make their own oxygen (that's why some things explode instead of burn!)
-------signature-------
Live long and prosper
|
|
|
webtaz99 Commodore
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 1229 Location: The Other Side
|
Thu Feb 26, 2004 6:37 pm |
|
imzadi76 wrote: | bullets and explosives would work great in space, probably even better than they do on Earth because there's no air or gravity to pull the bullet off course, and explosives (like gunpowder) make their own oxygen (that's why some things explode instead of burn!) |
A large percentage of the damage done by modern explosives results from shock waves in the air. Without air to transfer their kinetic energy, explosives (as we currently know them) are less effective.
|
|
|
Monkey Captain
Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 833 Location: On a quest you probably wouldn't believe.
|
Thu Apr 01, 2004 6:50 am |
|
i don't know what you mean with your wh40k and stuff i'm going now
-------signature-------
"Maybe I should get myself fired."
Millennium Actress
|
|
|
Sonic74205 Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 4081 Location: England
|
Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:02 am Re: Weapons, tactics and suchlike |
|
Coyote_finn wrote: | I was directed here by some people on B3ta, who were getting upset with my questions.
Honestly I thought that there would be a star trek fan or two on there.
As I am not a star trek fan, but find myself being forced to watch it when other people want it on.
I have some questions about the whole weapons malarkey.
Right it is the year 3000 or whatever, they seem to be able to beam people and make food, equipment etc out of nothing.
Yet their weapons are useless in a combat situation.
I was watching some episode of DS9 and they were taking on those ugly guys with the big heads, I think they are called Jemmardar or somthing like that.
The Humans had a great defensive postion and the uglies charged them in a pack with plenty of warning they were on their way.
Then the ray guns or whatever they are called were fired and immediatly gave away where the humans were hiding.
They only took one ugly out at a time and seemed to have a very slow fire rate.
If the humans had taken a couple of automatic rifles or even a ww1 machine gun, said uglies would have been taken out in a matter of seconds.
As a result uglies were able to charge humans uphill and kill a fair few.
Brings me to that film about the Borg.
They walk down corridors and make no attempt to get out of the way.
They adapt to the ray guns and then become unstoppable.
However patrick stewart took some out with a tommy gun.
That alien with the big head who acts like a viking or somthing takes them on with his gothy sword and wins.
They all seemed to have an issue with how limited their rayguns were.
So why did'nt they just go and make some machine guns with their stuff making machines and shoot all of the borg dead.
Even a few pikes or spears would have been more effective.
Again it brings me to the point that they have this so effective technology but when it comes to war they are not very good at it.
Hell, most human technology seems to be making more effective ways of killing each other, even if they don't like to make war any more they must have come across better weaponary along the way. |
star trek isn't about war and fighting it actually about exploration. The ships are equiped to defent them selves and no one internds to kill anyone at all so they use phasers on stun so then attacker isn't killed. And hand phaseres have 10 setting from stun to frag and phasers can be set to wide spread dispersal meanuing that with one shot whit the phaser set to kill could kill everyone in the room in a matter of seconds. plus phaseres are better cuz they recharge so u wont find urself running out of 'amo' in the middle of a fight. basically phaseres are better than primitive 'guns' (they can be used for lost of other things as well)
|
|
|
imzadi76 Commander
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 367 Location: Pittsburgh - PA - USA - Earth - Sector001 - Alpha Quadrant
|
Thu Apr 01, 2004 9:40 am |
|
webtaz99 wrote: | imzadi76 wrote: | bullets and explosives would work great in space, probably even better than they do on Earth because there's no air or gravity to pull the bullet off course, and explosives (like gunpowder) make their own oxygen (that's why some things explode instead of burn!) |
A large percentage of the damage done by modern explosives results from shock waves in the air. Without air to transfer their kinetic energy, explosives (as we currently know them) are less effective. |
I think you're forgetting that in space the debris & energy thrown off by the explosion would travel from the source of the explosion unimpeded. For example, the effects of supernova wipe out entire solar systems, and the effects can (and often do) wreck havok to nearby planetary systems.
-------signature-------
Live long and prosper
|
|
|
|