Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:40 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Bush didn't want to go to Vietnam? What?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 4:26 pm    Bush didn't want to go to Vietnam? What?

Read this. From the recent CBS Report talking about the forged Documents one.

The Report wrote:
The clear inference from this excerpt is that President Bush was in the TexANG to avoid
service in Vietnam. Bush did state in his 1968 TexANG application that he did not volunteer to
go overseas. However, Mapes had information prior to the airing of the September 8 Segment
that President Bush, while in the TexANG, did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned
down in favor of more experienced pilots.72 For example, a flight instructor who served in the
TexANG with Lieutenant Bush advised Mapes in 1999 that Lieutenant Bush �did want to go to
Vietnam but others went first.� Similarly, several others advised Mapes in 1999, and again in
2004 before September 8, that Lieutenant Bush had volunteered to go to Vietnam but did not
have enough flight hours to qualify. The Panel is troubled that this excerpt was used when there
was information that contradicted, or at least weakened, the implication of the exchange between
Rather and Lieutenant Strong.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 8:43 pm    

Well RM? No opinion on the matter? I have to know what I think!! (the opposite of you )

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 10:45 pm    

I think its funny how Clinton didn't go to Vietnam but that was never brought up by the Dem. party.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 10:59 pm    

Founder wrote:
I think its funny how Clinton didn't go to Vietnam but that was never brought up by the Dem. party.


Yeah, but it WAS brought up by the Republicans, and what happened? "Let's not go there."



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 11:06 pm    

So Bush and Clinton both avoided Vietnam, just like practically all of the rest of the country. I don't see why people fight about this when it has no relevance today .

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 11:08 pm    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
So Bush and Clinton both avoided Vietnam, just like practically all of the rest of the country. I don't see why people fight about this when it has no relevance today .


READ!

Quote:
However, Mapes had information prior to the airing of the September 8 Segment that President Bush, while in the TexANG, did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 11:12 pm    

Bah, I think they all tryed to dodge Vietnam, the whole country was at the time anyways. I can't blame them either, I don't know how I would feel about going to Vietnam myself .

Either way, where is the relevance? I don't get why this crap keeps getting brought up oooooover and ooooover.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jan 12, 2005 11:14 pm    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
Bah, I think they all tryed to dodge Vietnam, the whole country was at the time anyways. I can't blame them either, I don't know how I would feel about going to Vietnam myself .

Either way, where is the relevance? I don't get why this crap keeps getting brought up oooooover and ooooover.


Yes, Clinton was, and that's why he didn't want to talk about it. But Bush didn't. And since the CBS report came out, I wanted to prove a point: that Bush DIDN'T dodge the draft.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostThu Jan 13, 2005 4:53 am    

JanewayIsHott wrote:
Bah, I think they all tryed to dodge Vietnam, the whole country was at the time anyways. I can't blame them either, I don't know how I would feel about going to Vietnam myself .

Either way, where is the relevance? I don't get why this crap keeps getting brought up oooooover and ooooover.


True that. This was a dumb subject that was beat over the head by John Kerry. He flaunted his Purple Heart. Treating it like some trophy rather than a symbol of bravery. Makes me hate him all the more. The Dem kept bringing it up over and over and over. I for one am glad that this done and said.

Although you are right RM. Bush didn't dodge, but if he had I wouldn't have cared. This is not a qualification to be President! Despite what John Kerry says.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
MJ
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 266

PostTue Jan 18, 2005 3:43 am    

Well, if he had he would have been a coward in the eyes of soceity. Doesn't really fit with his cowboy-style leadership.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 4:57 pm    

Bush is not a coward. Just because he didnt go to vietnam does not make him one. He is trying to protect us against terrorists.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:14 pm    

Strangely, "protection from evil" was also Hitler's argument for killing Jews... (no parallel whatsoever, but whattheheck? let's fight)


-------signature-------

"You want to dance with the angels? Then embroider me with gold; and I will fly with the angels...and you can dance with me."

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:17 pm    

But Hiltler was a mad evil man that needed to be stopped. He was killin innocent people

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:18 pm    

And the innocent Iraqis and children that have been affected by the war in Iraq are not innocent?

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:24 pm    

Well sometimes that can not be helped. It is not the soldiers or the president. It is the terrorist fault.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:27 pm    

Uh huh. So the poverty and destitution that results in war on a country are the fault of the terrorists....

And may I remind you that 9/11 was in NO WAY connected to Iraq.


View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:31 pm    

And the news dont show the good things that the soldiers are doing to help the iraqi people. they are rebuilding and giving food supplies charlie should know he was over there the first time and he is over there again,.
he would not lie.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:32 pm    

I understand that we are picking up and rebuilding what we destroyed, that is our moral obligation at this point.

What I'm saying is that the war was UNFOUNDED and we went to Iraq on FALSE PRETENSES.

That's what I'm saying.


View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:34 pm    

Hello, yes the war was justified and there was wmds rather you believe it or not.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:34 pm    

Fictional WMD's that the U.S. government has yet to produce.

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:35 pm    

Really got proof

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Angeldust
The Mob Queen


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 6498
Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:38 pm    

And that proof is where, exactly?

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:40 pm    

" Bush should have voluntered to fight in the Vietnam War "

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:42 pm    

Maybe he did not want to at the time, everyone has a descion. Rather it is right or wrong

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSun Jan 23, 2005 5:42 pm    

I love when people say "We are killing innocent Iraqis." Yet they never say anything about when Saddam was doing it. I guess its ok to be killed by a tyrant....

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com