Do you think that the State and the Church should be separated (traditionalist? |
Of course not; just religion can't be forced on others (traditionalist) |
|
23% |
[ 6 ] |
No (moderately traditionalist) |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
Somewhat |
|
26% |
[ 7 ] |
Yes (moderately secularist) |
|
42% |
[ 11 ] |
|
Total Votes : 26 |
|
Author |
Message |
Captain Dappet Forum Revolutionist
Joined: 06 Feb 2002 Posts: 16756 Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:32 pm |
|
Republican_Man wrote: | Captain Dappet wrote: | I am not religious. Are you then saying I am immoral? |
No, I am not. I am just saying that without religion in public life, there will be no morals. However, you would be surrounded my many people of faith, and so that keeps morals in your life. | Let me tell you this; The people around me are not of faith, and they are not immoral. The church in my town is practically unused.
Does that make the whole lot of us immoral? You dont need Religion to be moral. You just need common sense.
|
|
|
Angeldust The Mob Queen
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 6498 Location: In your most wonderful, screwed up dreams. :P
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:35 pm |
|
Morality is a personal choice. It is not something that can be forced on you or even taught for that matter. I know a few people who are extremely devout, and extremely immoral. For that reason, I do not believe there is any correlation between religion and morality.
-------signature-------
"You want to dance with the angels? Then embroider me with gold; and I will fly with the angels...and you can dance with me."
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 4:41 pm |
|
I agree, the Catholic Church used to burn heretics, kill those who opposed them, and wage wars. None of that goes on anymore (or so it appears) but morals from a religion which used to commit mass murder, I mean, sheesh.
It seems rather pompous of anyone to come to the conclusion that it's religion that gave the world basic human dignity.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:11 pm |
|
I think the basic ideas of religion are accepted by all decent people. They may not worship any God or anything else, but the main religions of the world today hold the basic moral values that society needs to have. That is not to say the un-religious have morals, or the religious do, but most religions teach basic good morals, and goodwill. I think that some people confuse morals, and basic values, with religion and thus this is where they get the beleif that you need to take moral restraints out of society, which is wrong. Basic principals must be imposed on everyone, that is just a fact.
Also, I beleive that it is ok for politicians to hold value in faith, and include their faith in their actions. Even if you are not Christian, any person with at least some intelligence can see that in fact, the Bible does have some good lessons, whether you beleive in God or not.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:02 pm |
|
I agree, that people except most religions ideas as being good. All religions have morals of some sort, and society needs to have those. However, religion isn't the ONLY source of morals. Most people have morals in the first place, without having to be told to follow them and what they are by a religion.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:31 pm |
|
JanewayIsHott wrote: | I think the basic ideas of religion are accepted by all decent people. They may not worship any God or anything else, but the main religions of the world today hold the basic moral values that society needs to have. That is not to say the un-religious have morals, or the religious do, but most religions teach basic good morals, and goodwill. I think that some people confuse morals, and basic values, with religion and thus this is where they get the beleif that you need to take moral restraints out of society, which is wrong. Basic principals must be imposed on everyone, that is just a fact.
Also, I beleive that it is ok for politicians to hold value in faith, and include their faith in their actions. Even if you are not Christian, any person with at least some intelligence can see that in fact, the Bible does have some good lessons, whether you beleive in God or not. |
Wow, good way to put it. I agree all the way. Oh, and almost everybody has one type of religion--even athiests.
Captain Dappet wrote: | Republican_Man wrote: | Captain Dappet wrote: | I am not religious. Are you then saying I am immoral? |
No, I am not. I am just saying that without religion in public life, there will be no morals. However, you would be surrounded my many people of faith, and so that keeps morals in your life. | Let me tell you this; The people around me are not of faith, and they are not immoral. The church in my town is practically unused.
Does that make the whole lot of us immoral? You dont need Religion to be moral. You just need common sense. |
I didn't say that you are immoral--and read what Janeway said above--he tells it well. If anything, many secularists are AMORAL, not immoral, although SOME (only some) may be.
Quote: | I agree, that people except most religions ideas as being good. All religions have morals of some sort, and society needs to have those. However, religion isn't the ONLY source of morals. Most people have morals in the first place, without having to be told to follow them and what they are by a religion. |
Well, yes to the first. Yes, all religions have morals of some sort, and a society does need those. And you are right that religion isn't the only source of morals--however, the complete absence of religion means no morals or at least little morals.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:56 pm |
|
What makes you think that? Religion does inspire people on how to act and live. But it doesn't need to be there for people to appreciate others and all that. I don't think it's really possible to ever know what the world would be like without religion, as it's been here forever. Hell, it might even be better.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:52 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | What makes you think that? Religion does inspire people on how to act and live. But it doesn't need to be there for people to appreciate others and all that. I don't think it's really possible to ever know what the world would be like without religion, as it's been here forever. Hell, it might even be better. |
Yes, religion MUST be there for morals, and that does not necessarily mean just respect. Without religion, there WOULD BE LITTLE MORALS! Look at some secular countries, for instance.
Religion NEEDs to be in the public life and separation of church and state should not be extreme.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:33 pm |
|
It seems so silly to think that religion was the base for almost all morals. Of course religion inspires people who follow it to be good, etc. (depending on the religion). I mean, why don't you believe that people just are good without needing a religious influence? I refuse to have anything to do with my religion, and I refuse to let it influence me, but does that make me a bad person? No.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:34 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | It seems so silly to think that religion was the base for almost all morals. Of course religion inspires people who follow it to be good, etc. (depending on the religion). I mean, why don't you believe that people just are good without needing a religious influence? I refuse to have anything to do with my religion, and I refuse to let it influence me, but does that make me a bad person? No. |
If your refuse to have anything to do with your religion, then it is not your religion. No, it does not make you a bad person, but you've got religion all around you and religious traditions rooted from history.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:37 pm |
|
I consider it my religion, I go to a Catholic School, take RE, etc. It's still there, I just don't consider it anything except a myth.
Haha, that history comment is hilarious. A history with popes who had children, commited genocide, killed those who opposed them, and waged wars. Definitely roots that are worth keeping, for sure.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:39 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | I consider it my religion, I go to a Catholic School, take RE, etc. It's still there, I just don't consider it anything except a myth.
Haha, that history comment is hilarious. A history with popes who had children, commited genocide, killed those who opposed them, and waged wars. Definitely roots that are worth keeping, for sure. |
I'm talking more recent roots--and those were dark times in our history that I do not like.
However, if you call Catholocism a myth and say that it's your "Religion," it is NOT. You may "go to catholic school, etc" but you don't truly BELIEVE it, hence you are an athiest.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:46 pm |
|
It's still my religion, I just don't follow it. If I was religous, that's the one I'd be (if I accepted Catholicism). Besides, I've donated money to Catholic Church, so it's mine, as they haven't payed me in any way, shape, or form. I've bought them out.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:48 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | It's still my religion, I just don't follow it. If I was religous, that's the one I'd be (if I accepted Catholicism). Besides, I've donated money to Catholic Church, so it's mine, as they haven't payed me in any way, shape, or form. I've bought them out. |
How can it be your religion if you don't believe nor follow it?
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:50 pm |
|
Because, I've invested in it, it's miiiiiiiiiiine, When I was religious, that's what I was; if I still liked the religion and just didn't believe, but all of a sudden did, then that's the religion I'd be. Works for me.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:51 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Because, I've invested in it, it's miiiiiiiiiiine, When I was religious, that's what I was; if I still liked the religion and just didn't believe, but all of a sudden did, then that's the religion I'd be. Works for me. |
Well, it's my opinion that you are not Catholic but Athiest and Secularist.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
gilbert3729 Commander
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 390 Location: New England, USA
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:51 pm |
|
Quote: | Oh, and almost everybody has one type of religion--even athiests. |
I dont think of myself as having one religion. I grew up with a protestant religion so i have parts of that in my life, follow the jewish religion to some extenet, and believe in many parts of the budist religion.
Confining yourself to one religion just because that is what you are told to do is a really closed minded decision. I think that people should open their minds and look at what some of the other religions have to offer. To be religious you dont necesarily have to comit fully to one religion and pray everyday.
-------signature-------
Soylent Green is people!!!
John Kerry...
Bringing complete sentences back to the White House.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:54 pm |
|
Republican_Man wrote: | IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Because, I've invested in it, it's miiiiiiiiiiine, When I was religious, that's what I was; if I still liked the religion and just didn't believe, but all of a sudden did, then that's the religion I'd be. Works for me. |
Well, it's my opinion that you are not Catholic but Athiest and Secularist. |
You're right about Athiest, but NOT about Secularist. I have no problem with "god" being in the pledge, people wearing crosses in public, etc.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:56 pm |
|
IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Republican_Man wrote: | IntrepidIsMe wrote: | Because, I've invested in it, it's miiiiiiiiiiine, When I was religious, that's what I was; if I still liked the religion and just didn't believe, but all of a sudden did, then that's the religion I'd be. Works for me. |
Well, it's my opinion that you are not Catholic but Athiest and Secularist. |
You're right about Athiest, but NOT about Secularist. I have no problem with "god" being in the pledge, people wearing crosses in public, etc. |
Okay then.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:23 am |
|
Actually, atheism is the belief in no God or supreme being whatsoever. An Atheist is just as convinced about the nonexistence of God as a Catholic would be of the existence of God.
Agnosticism is the doubt of the existence of God or a supreme being. Agnostics are not Atheists because they aren't convinced--they are on the fence, or just not in one camp or the other.
A person who is not of any religion is more likely to be Agnostic than Atheist, simply because it is easier to sit on the fence, at least for the short-term.
Me? I don't know . . . I was raised Christian but have lately come to challenge my worldview of things. I'm certainly open to the possibility of a supreme being, and have no doubt that beings exist on a higher 'level' of reality as we perceive it . . . but whether or not I worship this being is another question.
As it is now, I don't think that the separation of Church and state is bad, nor do I think it is good. Obviously religion has its place in everyday life, just like everything else. But keep in mind that every system is susceptible to corruption--even if you have good intentions in mind when bringing Church and State closer together, often things get cloudier as time goes on.
|
|
|
Jeremy J's Guy
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 Posts: 7823 Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:06 pm |
|
gilbert3729 wrote: | Quote: | Oh, and almost everybody has one type of religion--even athiests. |
I dont think of myself as having one religion. I grew up with a protestant religion so i have parts of that in my life, follow the jewish religion to some extenet, and believe in many parts of the budist religion.
Confining yourself to one religion just because that is what you are told to do is a really closed minded decision. I think that people should open their minds and look at what some of the other religions have to offer. To be religious you dont necesarily have to comit fully to one religion and pray everyday. |
For most religions that would work, as all of the main world religions base salvation/ enlightenment etc on good works. It shouldn't really matter what religion you follow as long as you are good. The one exception to this is Christianity, which says that you have to follow Jesus Christ and believe that He died to save us all. Good works are part of the equation because God said to be good and so it shows we try and follow him.
I have to agree with RM here Aaron, you can't really call yourself Catholic because you put some money in when you were younger. Actually maybe you can as Catholics can buy their salvation, but I'm not sure. For Protestants you can't have it that way though.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:46 pm |
|
Catholics don't beleive you can "buy" your salvation. That is just silly.
This is the basics of what you have to beleive in order to be Catholic, along with the eucharist:
We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he was born of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered, died, and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in fulfillment of the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son.
With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
|
|
|
gilbert3729 Commander
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 390 Location: New England, USA
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:36 pm |
|
^^ catholics use to be able to buy thei salvation but i think they stopped that in the 1990's. i could be mistaken on the date.
-------signature-------
Soylent Green is people!!!
John Kerry...
Bringing complete sentences back to the White House.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 13057 Location: New York
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:54 pm |
|
Jeremy wrote: | gilbert3729 wrote: | Quote: | Oh, and almost everybody has one type of religion--even athiests. |
I dont think of myself as having one religion. I grew up with a protestant religion so i have parts of that in my life, follow the jewish religion to some extenet, and believe in many parts of the budist religion.
Confining yourself to one religion just because that is what you are told to do is a really closed minded decision. I think that people should open their minds and look at what some of the other religions have to offer. To be religious you dont necesarily have to comit fully to one religion and pray everyday. |
I have to agree with RM here Aaron, you can't really call yourself Catholic because you put some money in when you were younger. |
Tsssss, that's the religion I'd end up being, so that's my religion, it works for me.
|
|
|
Puck The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
|
Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:58 pm |
|
I don't see why religious people would want to stop a person from claiming to have a religion. If they claim to be Catholic, then there has to be some foundation, no matter how unstable or messy, that the claim is based on. Seems kind of presumptious to tell a person they are not a certain religion if they claim to be so.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|