Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:26 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Documents: Gitmo Inmates Attacked Guards
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 6:40 pm    

Link, the Hero of Time wrote:
Founder wrote:

They attacked us when they sided with the Terrorists.


Would this be Before or after we invaded their country with no evidence?


Before and after like RM said. Using the evidence the foreign nations and our intelligence gave us.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 6:46 pm    

Founder wrote:
IntrepidIsMe wrote:
And I don't care if its rare or not, it shouldn't be happening at all. You said you wanted proof, and there it is.


Liberal propaganda doesn't count.



Tsk, it was all quotes from military officals, not even they would change quotes, especially when it agrees with them, I'm sure.



-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 8:28 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:


Before AND after They aided and abeited the terrorists. Ring a bell, anyone?


We've done the same thing numerous times, how does that make us any different or better?


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 8:30 pm    

Link, the Hero of Time wrote:
Republican_Man wrote:


Before AND after They aided and abeited the terrorists. Ring a bell, anyone?


We've done the same thing numerous times, how does that make us any different or better?


If you are referring to us giving aide to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War and to Osama during the Afghanistan conflict, put them into the context of the times



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Link, the Hero of Time
Vice Admiral


Joined: 15 Sep 2001
Posts: 5581
Location: Kokori Forest, Hyrule

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 8:40 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
If you are referring to us giving aide to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War and to Osama during the Afghanistan conflict, put them into the context of the times


Those aren't the only times.

You are trying to rationalize those to your mindset, it wont work.

many times it was the US giving aid to terrorists to usurp a government we didn't like. Iraq did the same thing. Now how does that make them any different. Any person not thinking by government standards would see that.

What makes it different is that this time it was us on the recieving end, not our enemy.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Jul 19, 2005 8:42 pm    

Could you please give an example? The closest thing that you could give is the Oliver North scandal, which went above the President's nose. And I don't get why we're debating this right now--the comment was about Iraq having no connection with Al Quada and whatnot, which is FALSE.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostWed Jul 20, 2005 10:35 am    

My Commentary wrote:
In the past I have talked about how the media has been playing into the hands of the terrorists by pushing this story, and talked about what else the terrorists would say when they were let free�oh, things were great there. Yeah, right.
Well, I just wanted to say that it has been reported that there were no findings of TORTURE. Just some mild cases of abuses such as forcing a man to wear a bra, forcing a man to wear a dog leash, and having a dog used to get him to speak�but nothing severe and torturous. This is not torture�it is pure abuse, and while I do not condone it, it is NOT reason for the left to make our brave men and women seem like the bad guys in this war. These abuses are rare, and those that do do them are given their just punishment. It is NOT policy there�just a few people who are using more extreme corrosive tactics. But so what if they are? Sure, they shouldn�t do it, but at the same time the detainees are men caught in the field, and if they are not terrorists, then they are released�and many who are released are terrorists, in fact, and go back into the field killing Americans.
I�m not for these corrosive tactics, per se, but I am for some�after all, these ARE terrorists for Cripe�s Sake�terrorists who would do much more to the Americans than we�re doing to them there.
And besides, the detainees are treated quite well there overall, getting treatment that US prisoners don�t even get, from free prayer rugs to Korans to being allowed to pray 5 times a day to other things dictated by their religion. But overall it�s like what Rush Limbaugh calls it�Club Gitmo. Rare cases of abuse, yes. But nothing more. Keep in mind that these people are NOT Prisoners of War and are NOT American citizens, therefore do not deserve the same treatment as those cases would demand.
For the Liberals and Media to be playing like our troops are the bad guys is just foolish and wrong.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostWed Jul 27, 2005 6:52 am    

So as long as we think they're guilty then it's ok not to treat them well. I just hope if you're in somewhere like Saudi Arabia or Egypt and are arrested as a terrorist but not tried for years you don't complain. After all, they will have more information than us normal people, and will have to be right. Also since you wouldn't be from there then you don't need to have the same rights, just as you wouldn't be a solidier so you can't be a POW. Not that it's likely to happen, but view it from another point of view.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com