Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:25 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Enterprise wastes?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Enterprise This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Andorian Ambasodor
Ensign


Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 67
Location: Andoria

PostWed Jul 06, 2005 10:06 pm    Enterprise wastes?

How is it that Kirks Constitution class starship and other ships in that timeline were in comission for about half a century or more when Enterprise got decomissioned in just 10 years? Granted Star Trek was written in early post WW2 era when they re-used things much more and now we live in a world where we waste waste waste.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
InterstellarCrazed
Commander


Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 356
Location: United States

PostWed Jul 06, 2005 10:10 pm    

Could it be that Starfleet�s technological advances were being made at the same time that Kirk had a Constitution class starship? If there were so many changes that had to be made, it could have just been easier to replace the entire ship rather than keep upgrading and upgrading onto it. Kirk�s Enterprise was also a legends ship, why would they want to keep using a part of their history until it was destroyed when then could have it in a museum so that everyone could look at it? And I do doubt that the WW2 era had anything to do with Star Trek in the least.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
AUDACIOUS
Commander


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 491
Location: scifivisions.com

PostFri Jul 08, 2005 9:27 am    Hmm

Good point!

InterstellarCrazed wrote:
Could it be that Starfleet�s technological advances were being made at the same time that Kirk had a Constitution class starship? If there were so many changes that had to be made, it could have just been easier to replace the entire ship rather than keep upgrading and upgrading onto it. Kirk�s Enterprise was also a legends ship, why would they want to keep using a part of their history until it was destroyed when then could have it in a museum so that everyone could look at it? And I do doubt that the WW2 era had anything to do with Star Trek in the least.


Last edited by AUDACIOUS on Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:05 am; edited 1 time in total



-------signature-------

SCI FI VISIONS "Where reality is only a state of mind"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostSun Jul 10, 2005 8:02 am    

Dont forget that when the NX-01 was around they were only just getting into space exploration and it was one of the first starships built. The design is similar to a Submarine, every part of the ship is used. This would make the ship harder to upgrade and it would go out of date very quickly with its technology and everything. Plus the NX-01 saw a hell of a lot of fire fights and battle damage.

With the 1701 it was much bigger and much more versatile built for all different type of missions. Compared to the NX-01 the 1701 would be like a luxury liner. Plus they had more technology in the 1701's time and was more efficient. With its size technology the ships legend and its memorable crew it would have been better to just keep updating the ship instead of regularly replacing it.



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostSun Jul 10, 2005 5:37 pm    

^ Basicly what he said, the NX-01 isn't the easyest to upgrade, the NCC-1701 is, plus, its the design etc..., the later ships could be adapted for what they needed it to do, the NX-01 couldn't. Plus it was obsolete, what with the Dadeluse Class ships being made

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostSun Jul 10, 2005 5:59 pm    

Yeah i mean you look at the Enterprise NX-01 and then look at Columbia NX-02. The Columbia is alot more advanced than the enterprise. Its hull plating is better its top warp speed is higher. It had Ventral and Dorsal torpedo launchers. More phasers than the NX-01 and apparently it has "Pulse Phase Cannons" plus the Columbia's bridge is different. So much difference and the Columbia was built just over 3 years after the enterprise. So imagine that accept like in 10 years when the enterprise was decomissioned


-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
The Delta Flyer
Commodore


Joined: 08 Apr 2002
Posts: 2163
Location: East Yorkshire

PostMon Jul 11, 2005 5:43 pm    

Possibly early ships were not configured to last for an extended time in space. Maybe the ship was designed to only last a short amount of time.

Perhaps the way in which the NX-01 works was deemed too expensive as cheaper and more efficient engines were designed.

Heck, I'm talking about it as if it were real - I'm turning into one of those excessive fans!

NOOOOOOOOOOO

Wait! That sounded just like Vader from Revenge of the Sith! Argh!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostMon Jul 11, 2005 6:55 pm    

Well dont forget back then they didnt have many resources, the technology was poor and inificient.

Its like if you want a car that you can "Do up" with extra body kits, wheels and engines etc then you would go for a car thats either new or at most about 10 years old. Not a car thats older than that. (sry if im making no sense, need sleep lol)



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
robbiewebster
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Apr 2004
Posts: 2594
Location: Rochester, New York

PostSat Jul 30, 2005 12:37 am    

the producers wanted to attract a younger audience by making "cooler-looking" ships


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England

PostSat Jul 30, 2005 6:54 am    

Hey, I reckon Archer's ship was vintage! They should've kept it.

But yeah, it did get battered around rather a lot.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
robbiewebster
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Apr 2004
Posts: 2594
Location: Rochester, New York

PostSat Jul 30, 2005 10:14 pm    

^true

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kuro-chan
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 335
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

PostSun Jul 31, 2005 8:22 am    

Maybe the NX-01 was being reserved for a fleet museum, thus why she was being decommissioned so early. It was already extablished in ENT:E� that the NX-Class could last for over 120 years is carefully taken care of.


-------signature-------

-Kuro-chan



View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Combination
Crewman


Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Location: Planet Mars

PostSun Aug 07, 2005 11:23 am    

longer then our life time

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com