Constitution Class Ships..

Lord Borg · **Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:30 am Constitution Class Ships..**

Arn't they cool??

Here, for your enjoyment is a canon list of ships. If you know of more CANON (this means, said in an episode, or movie of star trek) of names and registry numbers, please tell me. (posting it is cool to

)

USS Constitution NCC-1700
USS Enterprise NCC-1701,
USS Excalibur NCC-1664,
USS Exeter NCC-1672,
USS Potemkin NCC-1657
USS Hood NCC-1703,
USS Republic NCC-1371,
USS Yorktown NCC-1717(or 1704),
USS Lexington NCC-1709,
USS Intrepid NCC-1631,
USS Constellation NCC-1017,
USS Farragut NCC-1647,
USS Kongo NCC-1710(was it around in tos or just the movies?),
USS Defiant NCC-1764

magenta · **Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:34 am**

You forgot the USS VALIANT that had the RED SQUAD KIDS CREW.It got blown up by the GEM HADAR in DS9.The sister ship to the DEFIANT.

luit14 · **Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:28 pm**

The USS Valiant was a Defiant class, not constitution class. The Defiant on the list isn't the one you are thinking of, it's from TOS.

Lord Borg · **Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:53 pm**

^ thats right luit. This Defiant was in the TOS episode The Tholian Web(sp?) It was also in the enterprise episode In a Mirror, Darkly one and two.

InterstellarCrazed · **Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:31 am**

I'm not the biggest TOS fan, but I do like the design of the class. During one of the TNG Episodes, I think it was Relics; you got a clear view of the bridge with Scotty and Picard. You also get to see it again in a few other DS9/ENT flashback / mirror episodes. The design, though, I doesn�t fit that well after the cool NX-01 class (It looked more advanced in my opinion).

Founder · **Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:34 am**

Lord Borg · **Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:38 am**

Found, I'm not exactly sure, but theres a reason why they went with the "submerine" look for the NX-01.

IC, yeah, they were very good episodes, loved how they were invluded. what bridge do you mean looks more advanced?

InterstellarCrazed · **Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:19 pm**

Lord Borg, I was talking about the NX-01 class. It may look a little bit like a submarine as Founder pointed out, but even with that I still believe that It looks more advanced. I love the class but it reminds me of a child's play toy.

ZiriDelvar · Lieutenant, Junior Grade Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 79

The Constitution class vessels looked the most elegant of any of the starships, in my opintion. In particular, the Constitution class vessels in the movies were quite sleek looking. Galaxy class vessels as in TNG were by far the ugliest vessels. The intrepid class Voyager wasn't bad though.

Kuro-chan · **Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:35 pm**

Well, as it was pointed out, the NX-Class may look more advanced than the Constitution-Class, however, on-screen evidence points towards the opposite.
ENT: In a Mirror Darkly, Part 2, we had a battle where the I.S.S. Avenger (from the Mirror Universe) fought against the Constitution-Class from our universe, the U.S.S. Defiant (NCC-1764) Despite coming from our weak and docile universe, the Defiant completely owned that ship and blew it into several pieces in a matter of minutes.

Lord Borg · **Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:37 pm**

^ The Defiant was made from technology 100 years in the future

as for the NX-01 looking more advanced, you should realized with modern day graphics, it's to be expected. I am sure the're would have been actuall working computer screens on TOS if they could have done it.

On a Side note of the Galaxy Class (Son to be carried in TNG area) it was not desgned for "sleek" it was desgned to be a self sustaining exploration vessle. It was also design to do a little bit of everything.

Brightstar82 · **Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:45 pm**

Very cool

blueskin · Ensign, Junior Grade Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 38

Brightstar82 · **Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:45 pm**

LOL I agree with you blueskin it does seem like that

Lord Borg · **Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:03 pm**

Because alot of WWII ships had those names

Good ol constitutions!