| Author |
Message |
Sam Kenobi
Not a Duke
Joined: 13 Jun 2003
Posts: 10373
Location: The 'Verse
|
 Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:01 pm The real movie #11 |
|
| Quote: | TV Guide Magazine
April 17-25, 2005
Star Trek: Ultimate Tribute
pahe 26
...So why, just weeks after it killed Enterprise, did Paramount announce an 11th Trek movie- one that will be written by Trek newbie Erik Jendresen (HBO's Band of Brothers) and won't feature characters from any Trek series? (It reportedly centers around an epic space event the occurs after Enterprise but before the original Star Trek.) [Rick] Berman, who is one of three executive producers attached to the project, said he was surprised the studio went public so quickly. "All we did was sign a writer," he says emphatically. "The film is only is the very early stages of development. It has not been green-lit. It might happen. It might not." |
Last edited by Sam Kenobi on Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:03 pm |
|
Ive heard a little about this. As of right now, the 11th movie takes place during the romulan war
|
|
|
starnova
Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:42 pm |
|
is this around ENT time or TOS time?
|
|
|
Alucard
Vampire
Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 2780
Location: Caaaaaanada
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:46 pm |
|
in between them
|
|
|
starnova
Commodore
Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1544
Location: Commodore on the USS Farraget
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:48 pm |
|
but there wont be any characters that we know 
|
|
|
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:01 pm |
|
. . . And it is a stupid idea. 
Holding another action Trek movie is a stupid idea, especially if it is detached from the rest of the series. Yes, wars are nice things to see, they are invigorating--the Dominion War was great for DS9. Yet they are not the primary focus on Trek. Writers can get away with wars on television series because they have a chance to focus elsewhere. A 2 or 3 hour movie doesn't have that luxury, if they focus it on the Romulan Wars then it will be about that.
Trek isn't about the wars. Trek is about the journey, dare I say it--the trek. I want more exploration, more self-discovery of the human pysche, not more battles and special effects. I can already see that on other SF shows. Maybe it sells . . . just further proof that Paramount has sold out along with the rest of the entertainment industry.
|
|
|
Captain Patrick
Commodore
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2421
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:19 pm |
|
I heard a little about this but i do not think it going to go any where, No Characters that we are going to know
|
|
|
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:46 pm |
|
Im not sure when at that period it is. some areas say that its showing events leading up to the war. some say its during the war
|
|
|
Five - seveN
Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 3567
Location: Shadow Moon
|
| Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:29 pm |
|
Eh, yeah.
"Hey, I've got this fabulous idea! Let's, eh, screw Trek up even further!
-Yeah, let's do that! We've destroyed quite a lot with ENT, but not quite all of Trek!
-I know, let's eh, make a movie about the Romulan Wars and... Let's make it all war and stuff and...
-What? Romulans? What's that?"
|
|
|
Jadzia Lenara Dax
Garbage Queen
Joined: 17 Oct 2001
Posts: 5761
Location: Sunnydale, California
|
| Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:06 pm |
|
[moved from GSTD to Future of Star Trek. talks about the new movie. jad.]
-------signature-------
"I can't stand someone who can outdepress me." -Shirley Manson, Garbage
|
|
|
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England
|
| Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:24 pm |
|
It doesn't take place in the romulan war. It take place approximately 80 years before kirk.
I'm looking forward to this film as ive posted around various areas of this site. I think it will go well and be excellently done. I think i'll have to see it at least 3 times when it comes out in the cinema 
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
Tuvok8917
Dutchie
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 4205
Location: On my way back home
|
| Sun Apr 24, 2005 9:48 am |
|
| Five - seveN wrote: | Eh, yeah.
"Hey, I've got this fabulous idea! Let's, eh, screw Trek up even further!
-Yeah, let's do that! We've destroyed quite a lot with ENT, but not quite all of Trek!
-I know, let's eh, make a movie about the Romulan Wars and... Let's make it all war and stuff and...
-What? Romulans? What's that?" |
That sounds like Pakleds.
|
|
|
magenta
Commander
Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 404
Location: AUSTRALIA
|
| Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:33 pm |
|
 I think a movie without any of the old star trek characters would be horrible?!?!! Why dont they combine all the old characters and make a movie about a war that needs all the experience of the old characters to win.Showing what they are all up to and how and where they are living.The offspring of the established characters?Child prodogys,chips off the old blocks 
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2005 4:34 am |
|
I totally agree with you magenta. Use characters we already know.
|
|
|
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:39 am |
|
It's going to be awful... I think someone is trying to commit genocide against us trekkies.
|
|
|
Otter
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 12895
Location: England
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:05 pm |
|
aint heard nothing about this
-------signature-------
Yeah, We'll Stay Forever This Way..
|
|
|
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:00 pm |
|
Go to: http://www.startrekvoyager.com/viewtopic.php?t=17299&start=25
Read the post made my me on page 2. It's got in bold letters Jendresen: Star Trek Needs Epic Adventure
That will tell you everything you need to know about the new movie.
So know people can STOP going on about how its in the Romulan war and blah blah blah!
-------signature-------
<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
|
|
|
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:08 pm |
|
| Hitchhiker wrote: | . . . And it is a stupid idea.
Holding another action Trek movie is a stupid idea, especially if it is detached from the rest of the series. Yes, wars are nice things to see, they are invigorating--the Dominion War was great for DS9. Yet they are not the primary focus on Trek. Writers can get away with wars on television series because they have a chance to focus elsewhere. A 2 or 3 hour movie doesn't have that luxury, if they focus it on the Romulan Wars then it will be about that.
Trek isn't about the wars. Trek is about the journey, dare I say it--the trek. I want more exploration, more self-discovery of the human pysche, not more battles and special effects. I can already see that on other SF shows. Maybe it sells . . . just further proof that Paramount has sold out along with the rest of the entertainment industry. |
Those I perhaps agree with. Perhaps a mini-series would be more appropriate?
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Otter
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 12895
Location: England
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2005 5:29 am |
|
| Chakotay1988 wrote: | Go to: http://www.startrekvoyager.com/viewtopic.php?t=17299&start=25
Read the post made my me on page 2. It's got in bold letters Jendresen: Star Trek Needs Epic Adventure
That will tell you everything you need to know about the new movie.
So know people can STOP going on about how its in the Romulan war and blah blah blah! |
very interesting..
-------signature-------
Yeah, We'll Stay Forever This Way..
|
|
|
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:21 am |
|
| Republican_Man wrote: | | Hitchhiker wrote: | . . . And it is a stupid idea.
Holding another action Trek movie is a stupid idea, especially if it is detached from the rest of the series. Yes, wars are nice things to see, they are invigorating--the Dominion War was great for DS9. Yet they are not the primary focus on Trek. Writers can get away with wars on television series because they have a chance to focus elsewhere. A 2 or 3 hour movie doesn't have that luxury, if they focus it on the Romulan Wars then it will be about that.
Trek isn't about the wars. Trek is about the journey, dare I say it--the trek. I want more exploration, more self-discovery of the human pysche, not more battles and special effects. I can already see that on other SF shows. Maybe it sells . . . just further proof that Paramount has sold out along with the rest of the entertainment industry. |
Those I perhaps agree with. Perhaps a mini-series would be more appropriate? |
I agree (OMG! I agree with RM!!  )... farscape and battlestar galactica's mini series were good
|
|
|
Cathexis
The Angel of Avalon
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 5901
Location: ~~ Where Dreams Have No End�
|
| Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:16 am |
|
I totally agree with Hitch on this one, guys!
|
|
|
MakeItSo
Commander
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 406
Location: Somewhere in California
|
| Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:22 am |
|
Yeah, I just want characters that we know. It just wouldn't be as fun if we didn't see any of the characters that we know and love. The whole reason the movies were successful is because it was off of the series and characters that we're so familiar with. I mean, each show has a few years to develop characters. I don't know, I just want a good movie!
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
