Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:09 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Gay Families discussed in 6-year-old book. O'Reilly's take
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Do you agree with O'Reilly or the School?
O'Reilly
58%
 58%  [ 7 ]
Middle/Undecided (Elaborate)
16%
 16%  [ 2 ]
The School
25%
 25%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 12

Author Message
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostFri May 13, 2005 5:42 pm    Gay Families discussed in 6-year-old book. O'Reilly's take

Quote:
Don't Kid Around in the Classroom
By: Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, May 12, 2005

Think back to when you were six years old. What was your world like? Mine consisted of playing baseball, cowboys and Indians (I didn't know from Native Americans), and watching a goofy guy named Howdy Doody on TV. That filled much of my leisure time.

In school, a glaring nun named Sister Lurana taught me to read 'Dick and Jane' stories. I had a book that said stuff like, "Look at Jane. See Jane run. Dick likes Jane." It really didn't matter to me whether Dick liked Jane or not--I wanted to climb a tree. But the nun insisted I learn to read the book, so I did.

Today, in Lexington, Massachusetts, six year-olds have another book. It is called "Who's In a Family?" This book features not only Dick and Jane but Jennifer and Lauren and Charles and Henry. The pages tell little kids about different kinds of families: mixed race, gay and lesbian, and even traditional family units. They are all discussed in very positive ways.

A father named David Parker took one look at the same sex part of the book and made an appointment to see the principal of the Estabrook Elementary School, a woman named Joni Jay. Mr. Parker asked Ms. Jay to inform him when the gay family stuff was going to be presented, because he felt his little son was too young to learn about homosexuality and he would keep him home that day. Sounds reasonable, right?

Not so fast.

Ms. Jay informed Mr. Parker that the family book had nothing to do with sexuality, and so he was not entitled under the Massachusetts sex-ed law to get a heads up. When Mr. Parker pointed out that same sex situations contain the word 'sex,' he was asked to leave the principal's office. He refused. So the Lexington police arrested him on trespassing charges.

See Dad get arrested. What does Jane think?

Very quietly all over the country, these kinds of culture war expositions are being played out in assorted public school systems. Under the banner of teaching tolerance, many school boards have okayed books that delve into social issues far beyond the comprehension of most six-year-olds. I don't know about you, but I thought gay meant "happy" until I was eleven years old, and even then, I could not have cared less whether Lenny and Squiggy were a couple. I wanted to steal second and see monster movies, not understand what happens in Key West.

But today we have a massive mission of indoctrination going on in America, and millions of traditional parents don't like it. I am siding with that group. I don't want to tell my little kids about "alternative lifestyles" unless we're talking about the Munchkins in the "Wizard of Oz."

I think both Dick and Jane would agree that we should all back off and give the kids a break. Let's bring back childhood in America, okay? No more "diversity" books for kindergarteners. No more bare midriffs for nine-year-old girls. No more gold chains for boys going into third grade. Got it? Let's work together on this.

The world is a tough, nasty place and children will learn that soon enough. Shouldn't we make their first years fun years, free of political and social agendas? Why do some little kids these days look like Britney Spears and Kid Rock? What the deuce is wrong with us?

Summing up, Dick likes Jane and that's enough for six-year-olds. Larry and Bruce can wait a few years.

Source


Alright. This is DISGUSTING. Look, children should have a CHILDHOOD for once, and yet we're ripping that and their innocence AWAY. Although I would go a bit farther, as to saying that such things should NOT be discussed in the classroom, O'Reilly is right-on in this article. This is disturbing. (Btw, I didn't know what gay meant until age 13)



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Zeke Zabertini
Captain


Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 4832

PostFri May 13, 2005 8:22 pm    

Well, I do think that it should simply be taken as a given, but I don't see the harm in teaching kids this stuff. I can understand that it's important for people to learn about these issues, but personal experience could suffice. If you do want to educate children on homosexuality, I think it should be done "casually," not pointed out. For example, show two men together in some pictures instead of a man and a woman. Pointing out differences and outlining them increases stigma between groups in social issues such as these. In working towards social equality, these things must be acknowledged as reality by children and adults alike. However, I see no point in accentuating such differences at an early grade-school level. While it is important for young children to grow and learn about the issues of our society, it is wrong to involve them in our controversies at such a young age. Thus, I agree that homosexuality should be neutrally acknowledged in education, not taught in elementary school. If not for exactly the same reason (or at least from a different angle on the same reason), I agree with O'Reilly on this topic.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostFri May 13, 2005 10:31 pm    

I agree that it shouldn't be taught to young children. When I was six, I knew that most of my friends had a mummy and daddy and maybe brothers and sisters, but that my friend and a couple of other kids in my class didn't have a daddy living at home. I didn't think why until I was older- I just wasn't interested in anything like that. Even when it came to race- I wasn't interested in why some of the other kids were a different colour, apart from it being a difference like some kids had different hair colours and eye colours. I was more interested in why I had to wear a uniform but my best friend got to wear dresses (uniform wasn't compulsary then), not having green (that's a boy's colour ) and playing in the playground.

When the children are older, it should maybe be discussed, but no way at such a young age. I don't think most children are particulary interested, and if one or two of them have specific questions they should be answered but I doubt they'd even arise at their age.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostFri May 13, 2005 10:47 pm    

Quote:
A father named David Parker took one look at the same sex part of the book and made an appointment to see the principal of the Estabrook Elementary School, a woman named Joni Jay. Mr. Parker asked Ms. Jay to inform him when the gay family stuff was going to be presented, because he felt his little son was too young to learn about homosexuality and he would keep him home that day. Sounds reasonable, right?

Not so fast.

Ms. Jay informed Mr. Parker that the family book had nothing to do with sexuality, and so he was not entitled under the Massachusetts sex-ed law to get a heads up. When Mr. Parker pointed out that same sex situations contain the word 'sex,' he was asked to leave the principal's office. He refused. So the Lexington police arrested him on trespassing charges.


This instance is ridiculous. Utter crap. Exactly what rights are parents allowed now?



-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostFri May 13, 2005 10:51 pm    

Theresa wrote:
Quote:
A father named David Parker took one look at the same sex part of the book and made an appointment to see the principal of the Estabrook Elementary School, a woman named Joni Jay. Mr. Parker asked Ms. Jay to inform him when the gay family stuff was going to be presented, because he felt his little son was too young to learn about homosexuality and he would keep him home that day. Sounds reasonable, right?

Not so fast.

Ms. Jay informed Mr. Parker that the family book had nothing to do with sexuality, and so he was not entitled under the Massachusetts sex-ed law to get a heads up. When Mr. Parker pointed out that same sex situations contain the word 'sex,' he was asked to leave the principal's office. He refused. So the Lexington police arrested him on trespassing charges.


This instance is ridiculous. Utter crap. Exactly what rights are parents allowed now?


Nothing, if it interferes with the school And yet when it deals with religion or something other than the Liberal agenda, they won't do anything to the parents for fear of being sued



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostFri May 13, 2005 11:00 pm    

Yeah.. schools feel as if they are the real parents of the kids so they can just talk about what ever they want and thats not right.


"Hey mom.. the teacher read us a book about sex." How would you respond to that when you 5 year old son or daughter says that to you? I'd be pretty mad if that were me.


Why expose them to this stuff now? I don't think kids this age should have to know about this stuff at such a young age. There basicly taking away parenting issues into there own hands.


~Andrew



-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Zeke Zabertini
Captain


Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 4832

PostFri May 13, 2005 11:07 pm    

On the other side of that issue though, there will always be controversial topics. Kids should still be taught about things. This is where debates about evolution versus creationism arise in public education. Obviously the history of mankind is an important element in a complete education, but to teach any one thing is biased, and there isn't time or resources to teach every single theory.

...Okay, I just went way more off topic than I intended. Carry on.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Lord Borg
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 11214
Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan

PostFri May 13, 2005 11:10 pm    

I think the point is, that a parnet should have the right to choose what the young child learns especialy when said child is only 6 years old

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostFri May 13, 2005 11:10 pm    

Well, I understand what you mean. I just don't think it's right to expose inocent kids to this kind of stuff at school. That's why they have parents. Parents are the school on this subject and it should be first learned from them. That's why they call it 'parenting'



Just the thought that kids will be exposed to this stuff on the next day of school... it's crap.



-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostSat May 14, 2005 10:47 am    

I don't particularly mind this. I've seen kids younger than 5 or 6 who know about this, and its a fact of life. These kids don't need to be sheltered from the facts of life, and the more we shelter our children, the worse off our children are, because they'll make uninformed descisions.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat May 14, 2005 11:23 am    

Starbuck wrote:
I don't particularly mind this. I've seen kids younger than 5 or 6 who know about this, and its a fact of life. These kids don't need to be sheltered from the facts of life, and the more we shelter our children, the worse off our children are, because they'll make uninformed descisions.


Whaa--Why the heck do 6 year olds need to know about gay people to make informed decisisions? That makes NO SENSE. And it's GOOD to shelter kids from the "facts of life," if they are disruptive, etc, for as long as possible. Let them have a childhood, for cripe's sake!



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostSat May 14, 2005 1:16 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
Whaa--Why the heck do 6 year olds need to know about gay people to make informed decisisions? That makes NO SENSE. And it's GOOD to shelter kids from the "facts of life," if they are disruptive, etc, for as long as possible. Let them have a childhood, for cripe's sake!
What EXACTLY is a childhood?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
madlilnerd
Duchess of Dancemat


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 5885
Location: Slough, England

PostSat May 14, 2005 1:18 pm    

I would define a childhood as a stage in a young persons life where they have little or no responsibilty and are free to develop and grow without pressures from society.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Zeke Zabertini
Captain


Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 4832

PostSat May 14, 2005 2:07 pm    

I think that ends when you go into school.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat May 14, 2005 2:45 pm    

Zeke Zabertini wrote:
I think that ends when you go into school.


Why the heck does childhood end when you going into Preschool, hmmm? Or Kindergarten? Let them be KIDS. Don't force this kind of thing on them.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostSat May 14, 2005 7:26 pm    

I agree with RM.


Children are INOCENT. The school aren't the parents. There job is to teach about math and how to spell "Apple." Not homosexuality! There kids. Don't let them be exposed to this kind of stuff because it isn't right at such a young age.



-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat May 14, 2005 7:37 pm    

^Right. Will Ferrel just came out with a new VERY, VERY FUNNY movie, Kicking and Screaming, mostly a children's film. However, what I didn't like about it was how this one kid had two moms--and it's a KIDS' MOVIE!
They didn't go too in-depth, but still. That's not right.
And even though I don't want to see it, a lot of young children like Hilary Duff, and in the preview for her new movie, there's a gay guy talking about looking for another guy for years. I just don't think it's right to include such a thing.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostSat May 14, 2005 7:45 pm    

Is there no decency?


People today.. It amazes me how people can do that to kids. Soon they'll be telling a 5 year old kid how to use a condom



-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostSun May 15, 2005 8:59 am    

I think this is very good. I think children should learn that homosexuality is a normal thing, that occurs in every country, in every street, in every home. Children are much smarter than we adults sometimes think.
My father is handicapped, and I grew up thinking that was a normal thing. It didn't bother me. But when I walked in the streets I saw people looking at him, and I found out that it wasn't so normal as I thought it was.
It's the same thing with homosexuality. I think it's just as normal as heterosexuality, but there are lots of people who think of it otherwise.



-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostSun May 15, 2005 9:44 am    

Birdy wrote:
I think this is very good. I think children should learn that homosexuality is a normal thing, that occurs in every country, in every street, in every home. Children are much smarter than we adults sometimes think.
My father is handicapped, and I grew up thinking that was a normal thing. It didn't bother me. But when I walked in the streets I saw people looking at him, and I found out that it wasn't so normal as I thought it was.
It's the same thing with homosexuality. I think it's just as normal as heterosexuality, but there are lots of people who think of it otherwise.
I agree most whole heartedly. Homosexuality is a normal part of life, and we shouldn't try to hide it, we should embrace it. I grew up with a similiar expierence, but with homosexuality. My cousin kyle is homosexual, and she's absolutly wonderful. She is the nicest person anyone could ever hope to meet (she's nicer than Andrew). So I grew up with someone homosexual who was very close to me, so personally I see nothing wrong with this. If we teach our children now that homosexuality is a normal thing, then the next generation won't be so discriminatve as we are.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostSun May 15, 2005 9:48 am    

Starbuck wrote:
I agree most whole heartedly. Homosexuality is a normal part of life, and we shouldn't try to hide it, we should embrace it. I grew up with a similiar expierence, but with homosexuality. My cousin kyle is homosexual, and she's absolutly wonderful. She is the nicest person anyone could ever hope to meet (she's nicer than Andrew). So I grew up with someone homosexual who was very close to me, so personally I see nothing wrong with this. If we teach our children now that homosexuality is a normal thing, then the next generation won't be so discriminatve as we are.


Exactly. I totally agree. My uncle is gay, he has a boyfriend, and it's totally normal to me and my family. I have some friends who are gay, well, I really don't know what's wrong with them. They're just people!
I totally agree with your last sentence. So true!



-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun May 15, 2005 11:30 am    

You DON'T teach little kids about homosexuality. Wait until they're 11 or 12--maybe 10 if you have to. Let them have a CHILDHOOD. It's not good to teach them things like this at such a young age.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostSun May 15, 2005 11:49 am    

RM, your wasting your words. We all have different ways of doing things. To be honest no one know's the correct way. We all just have to play it by ear. We shouldn't shield our children from life, but we shouldn't expose them to stuff like that at a young age. Again... we don't know if thats the right way to handel it..


-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Zeke Zabertini
Captain


Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 4832

PostSun May 15, 2005 12:18 pm    

Republican_Man wrote:
Zeke Zabertini wrote:
I think that ends when you go into school.
Why the heck does childhood end when you going into Preschool, hmmm? Or Kindergarten? Let them be KIDS. Don't force this kind of thing on them.
I was making reference to
madlilnerd wrote:
I would define a childhood as a stage in a young persons life where they have little or no responsibilty and are free to develop and grow without pressures from society.
when I said that, in the sense that once kids are put into school they are given responsibilty and are no longer free to develop and grow without pressures from society. I'm not condoning this particular instance, I'm just countering madlilnerd's argument.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
AndrewBullock
The Misguided One


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 2112
Location: Kentucky. (North America)

PostSun May 15, 2005 2:09 pm    

^^See^^


-------signature-------

"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com