Author |
Message |
Lord Borg Fleet Admiral
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 11214 Location: Vulcan Capital City, Vulcan
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:31 pm Britney Spears is pregnant |
|
I just saw on my home page that britney spears is pregnat. was wondering when they were gonna admit it.
btw did anyone eles find it comical when Kevin (brits husband) ex announced she didnt think they were ready to care for a baby cause theyve never delt with one and thats why she wont let them care for her new born?
|
|
|
zero Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 4566 Location: Texas
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:46 pm |
|
acutally she had a miscarrage. I read it on one of her websites....
It was probably an abortion though, because her and her hubby aren't doing too well. But if it was a miscarrage, that is sad cause she wanted a baby so bad!! poor thing!
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:57 pm |
|
zero wrote: | acutally she had a miscarrage. I read it on one of her websites....
It was probably an abortion though, because her and her hubby aren't doing too well. But if it was a miscarrage, that is sad cause she wanted a baby so bad!! poor thing! |
Thats realy sad I don't even like britney spears but it's sad for anyone to have a miscarrage!
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:10 pm |
|
But it was JUST on TV 20 minutes ago that she was pregnant...
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
zero Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 4566 Location: Texas
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:22 pm |
|
Maybe it was a false website then... Casuse it said it. It was a link so I don't remember the name. But if it was just on TV I am guessing the miscarrage is false! YAY!!!
|
|
|
Dirt Exercise Boy
Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 2086 Location: a tree
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:02 am |
|
What a poor *beep*,
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:22 am |
|
zero wrote: | Maybe it was a false website then... Casuse it said it. It was a link so I don't remember the name. But if it was just on TV I am guessing the miscarrage is false! YAY!!! |
Well thats good
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:08 am |
|
Yeah... I heard it on my radio too. I was like; WHY does she have to reproduce herself?? I can't see her as a good mother at all. She's like a stripper but without getting totally naked.
She's only 21 years old (or something), she has no education, she just got married, how on earth can you raise a baby like that?? Plus she's like superfamous so that child will have no privatelife whatsoever.
-------signature-------
Nosce te ipsum
|
|
|
Seven of Nine Sammie's Mammy
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 Posts: 7871 Location: North East England
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:18 am |
|
I'm 18, with very very little education, haven't yet married, and have a 15 month daughter. I raise Samantha just fine. Often, it's the people you least expect to be are the best mothers. All I can say is good luck to her- if she applies herself I'm sure she'll be a good mother.
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:21 am |
|
^ I know, that's the other side of it. But her lifestyle, the way she lives (as I hear it from the media) is not a good lifestyle if you have a kid. So I hope she changes it.
Still I don't think it will be nice growing up with the fact that you have a very famous mother which results in very little privacy.
-------signature-------
Nosce te ipsum
|
|
|
Jeremy J's Guy
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 Posts: 7823 Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:32 am |
|
I agree with Birdy. And not to mention that the kid will probably be very spoilt!
Last edited by Jeremy on Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:40 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Birdy Socialist
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 13502 Location: Here.
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:39 am |
|
Probably. If Britney is as spoiled as she looks, no doubt. Unfortunatly.
-------signature-------
Nosce te ipsum
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:46 am |
|
I feel sorry for kids that have been born into fame. you wonder if they realy want to be famous. I no i wouldn't
|
|
|
Seven of Nine Sammie's Mammy
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 Posts: 7871 Location: North East England
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:32 am |
|
It's really up to Britney... and I don't trust the media's portrayal of celebrities.
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:34 am |
|
Is this even world news? i would call it Chit Chat.
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:51 am |
|
Did she really have a miscarriage or an abortion? If she miscarried I am sorry about it. Maybe she can have another one. Celebs can have kids and be good parents, even though I disagree with the way she dresses. Not good role model for teens. but hey that's just my opinion. I hope she will have a baby someday. Be cute!
|
|
|
Dirt Exercise Boy
Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 2086 Location: a tree
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:56 am |
|
Poor baby, later he/she/it can be like: ''my mommy was a famous *beep* when I grew up, and my daddy already had kids with another woman and has never had a real job in his life"
|
|
|
zero Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 4566 Location: Texas
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:01 pm |
|
Dirt wrote: | Poor baby, later he/she/it can be like: ''my mommy was a famous *beep* when I grew up, and my daddy already had kids with another woman and has never had a real job in his life" |
I'd say he did being that he is a pro dancer and danced for britney, justin timberlake, and usher. Is that not a job?
( I know what you mean though)
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:11 pm |
|
Why is it such a big deal, people are still allowed to reproduce you know! I reckon she'll give it a really stupid name, like Gypsy or Seetee or Tongue or some other bizarre word.
I can see why she wanted to keep it a secret though (she's been denying it for months), because if she had had a miscarraige or abortion then the press would have made a big thing of it.
Whether she will make a good mum... tricky. The likelyhood is that the kid will be raised by a nanny a lot of the time, I think thats the Beverly Hills fashion at the moment.
I think it's stupid that famous people's kids automatically become famous. You should have to earn your way to the A list, not get born into it.
I think it's quite good for Britney to be a mum at twenty two. Lots of famous people are having babies at any age between 38 and 42, and I think it's weird to have parents in their fifties when you're a teenager. But then I suppose they wouldn't look old because of all the yoga and plastic surgery.
P.S
Plus, I'm for married mums, because that way its harder for your partner to just up and leave, but I don't see anything wrong with non married people living together or single mums. Infact, I knew a couple that had two kids and waited till their kids were 15 and 13 to get married, so their kids could be at their wedding. I thought that was cute.
-------signature-------
Help me. Get Lost.
www.lost.eu/1b3b1
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:30 pm |
|
She didn't have a miscarraige, actually, but yeah. I don't think she would be a good mother either. Not because of her age, but because of how she acts, what she does, etc.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Arellia The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 4425 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:35 pm |
|
She might be a bad mother (I would bet so, but oh well) and she might be a good one--why is it any business of anyone else but her and her family? There are lots of bad parents in the world, worse than she would be. It's her perrogative to have a baby, and since she apparently is going to, I wish her well.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:36 pm |
|
I never said that she shouldn't, or anything like that. I agree with that, but it's my GUESS that she won't be that good of a mother, that's all.
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:38 pm |
|
In my opinion, I don't think she would be a good role model for a child by the way she dresses and acts. But if she so happens to get pregnant and want it, then let's pray for the child.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:41 pm |
|
Rbgirl wrote: | In my opinion, I don't think she would be a good role model for a child by the way she dresses and acts. But if she so happens to get pregnant and want it, then let's pray for the child. |
Yes. I agree. What kind of a mother could she be if she's the opposite of a good role model for children?
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Arellia The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 4425 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:43 pm |
|
Having children changes people sometimes. *shrugs* It might for her, too.
|
|
|
|