Do you think a brain chip is a good idea? |
Yes |
|
52% |
[ 9 ] |
No |
|
41% |
[ 7 ] |
"Resistance is Futile." |
|
5% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 17 |
|
Author |
Message |
Seven of Nine Sammie's Mammy
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 Posts: 7871 Location: North East England
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:29 pm |
|
I know a girl (well, a teenager) with cerebal palsy. She is confined to a wheelchair, because she has very little control over her four limbs (she can move them, but not normally where she wants them to be).
If they created a computer chip that would allow her to control her own limbs, I would like her to have it (I don't know if she would want it though... I might ask her when I next see her... might even get her to post here if she wants to).
So long as the only "program" on the chip was for a limited purpose (such as allowing the brain to control the limbs properly) then it should be ok. However, it would have to be tightly controlled and regulated.
-------signature-------
v3sw4Hhw6ln6pr3Sck4ma8u7Lw2m3l7Oi5e4/5t4TNDVBSFRMGb9Hen6g6TRPCMa19s6FBRr5p9 hackerkey.com
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:35 pm |
|
Couldn't it malfunction and cause electrocution or something? There's this thing they can put in your brain, kinda like a pacemaker but for people who shake uncontrollerbly, and I suppose this chip is the same kinda idea.
I was writing Sci fi, and I decided that instead of Universal Translators, there will be language chips that download languages into your brain. But the cheap ones malfunction and can cause permanent brain damage and mental health problems
|
|
|
madlilnerd Duchess of Dancemat
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 5885 Location: Slough, England
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:41 pm |
|
There's something quite offlimits about the human brain. We need it to live, and we don't like other people controlling our lives, so the idea of brain chips is somewhat frightening. It's like in that movie, bicentinial man, they wont accept him as human because he doesn't have a human brain. If you have "add ons" do you still have a human brain? People would allow transplants for any other part of their body, but your brain is your brain and your brain alone, and the idea of something not human up there is as frightening as the idea of AI
|
|
|
lionhead Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4020 Location: The Delta Quadrant (or not...)
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:34 pm |
|
I don't think we humans have enough understanding of the human brain to go tamper with it. Thats like trying too ride a motorcycle while can't even ride a Bike.
-------signature-------
Never explain comedy or satire or the ironic comment. Those who get it, get it. Those who don't, never will. -Michael Moore
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:48 pm |
|
lionhead wrote: | Hitchhiker wrote: | nadia wrote: | MMM..... I don't even like it being used for disabled people. |
Why not? It's just another prosthesis, like glasses, prosthetic limbs, or pacemakers. If I were paralyzed, I would view the brain chip as a convenience bordering upon a necessity. Stephen Hawking, the renowned physicist, suffers from Lou Gehrig's disease, and thus has severely impaired motor functions, but can communicate by using a computer with what little motor control he has left. |
a pacemaker doesn't take over your brain. it isn't cybernetic. |
^^^^^THAT'S WHY!
|
|
|
Zeke Zabertini Captain
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 4832
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:55 pm |
|
lionhead wrote: | a pacemaker doesn't take over your brain. it isn't cybernetic. | Neither does this...
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:26 pm |
|
But it's a totaly different thing to a pacemaker!
|
|
|
Hitchhiker Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 3514 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:29 pm |
|
nadia wrote: | But it's a totaly different thing to a pacemaker! |
You are correct.
But its purpose is the same, it is to help those whose bodies do not have the natural fortitude to provide an adequate quality of life. In this case, it is similar as I have said to a prosthetic limb--which could be cybernetic. It's just something that allows more efficienct communication because of damage to this person's nervous system.
|
|
|
nadia cookie
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8560 Location: Australia
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:43 pm |
|
Hitchhiker wrote: | nadia wrote: | But it's a totaly different thing to a pacemaker! |
You are correct.
But its purpose is the same, it is to help those whose bodies do not have the natural fortitude to provide an adequate quality of life. In this case, it is similar as I have said to a prosthetic limb--which could be cybernetic. It's just something that allows more efficienct communication because of damage to this person's nervous system. |
Yea but the prosthetic limb dosn't go in you brain and it dosnt realy read your thoughts
|
|
|
|