| Author |
Message |
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York
|
 Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:07 pm |
|
It makes more sense that people are born homosexual; afterall: love is blind.
I don't see why someone would choose to be only homosexual. Why go through life being discriminated against and risk being murdered only because of your sexual orientation? Don't know.
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Raven_voy
Lieutenant
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 149
|
| Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:09 pm |
|
So should I lie to myself and to others just because I'm afraid that someone is going to kill me if I don't? How can I be happy like that?
It isn't about choice. It's about who you are.
|
|
|
Puck
The Texan
Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596
|
| Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:20 pm |
|
| Raven_voy wrote: | So should I lie to myself and to others just because I'm afraid that someone is going to kill me if I don't? How can I be happy like that?
It isn't about choice. It's about who you are. |
Ok, please point out to me where IntrepidIsMe said that gays need to live a lie? Did you even read his post...did you read every other word, are you tired...seriously.
Now, he may correct me if I am wrong, however, what I believe he was getting at is the fact that he would agree with the impression that people are born homosexual, and that it is not a choice. As a matter of fact, he says that he doesn't understand why, if it was a choice that people made, why anyone would choose to be homosexual, considering all the persecution that they are subjugated to.
|
|
|
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed
Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York
|
| Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:31 pm |
|
Exactly, 
-------signature-------
"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."
-Wuthering Heights
|
|
|
Raven_voy
Lieutenant
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 149
|
| Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:53 pm |
|
I didn't write that in response to his post but in response to the posts before. I can see why you would think I was referring to him though. Sorry about the misunderstanding. The "so" must have been irritating in that post.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
