Friendly Star Trek Discussions Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:03 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Fahrenheit 9/11 Who seen it?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Scifi, Fantasy, and Drama This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 11:17 am    Fahrenheit 9/11 Who seen it?

I just got done seeing it and I couldn't belieive it. Bush was still reading a book after the first plane hit the tower what kind of man does that? he should have left the school and done his duties. Another thing that upseted me is that Micheal Moore went to congress to see who would try and sign their kids up for the army or other branches and no one did. I guess only the poor have to sacrafice themselfs for this country. Another thing is that a woman lost her son in Iraq and she went by a stand of a woman who was protesting the president, well a lady came up and accused her of being a plant when she told the lady her son died her reply was "Blame Al Quida" its not their fault we are in Iraq thats Bushes fault.

Besides that who is looking forword to see his sequal to this blockbuster named Fahrenheit 9/11�? I personally can't wait.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Sonic74205
Rear Admiral


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 4081
Location: England

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 11:26 am    

Yes i would love to see a sequal very much.

I also was shocked at the bit where that amrican soldier was in Iraq and he was standing next to a tank and he started sing All you m***er f**kers burn...etc etc

I was apauled at that
Good film



-------signature-------

<a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 11:30 am    

I'll agree I was shocked at that portion of the film. I was also shocked about the images of the dead kids and that one getting stiched up. I can't wait to see what people will think of the sequal I know the repubs won't like it though.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 2:33 pm    

I never saw it. I did see Farenhype 9/11 and it basically disaproved everything in the movie. So I didn't bother watching it.

I love when people get upset about the Bush sitting for a full seven minutes. Seven minutes!? Dear God.....He could have prevented the entire attack. What Moore's movie DOESN'T tell you, im sure, is that he was told not to rush out of there. But whatever. Actually a few congressmen did say yes but Moore hit the edit button and suddenly not one did. Moore is notorious for editing his movies. There is no draft. This lday should have told her son to come home. If he chose to defend his nation, then that isn't the President's fault. He was a good man. Now im sure you'll dislike my views and thats ok. Im not asking you to beleive me. Yes this movie was very popular for its hard hitting Journalism. Im assuming the sequal will be about the same stuff. It will probably be as popular if not more. I believe Moore won an award for this movie too.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 3:39 pm    

Isn't it funny how people always try to throw a fit and say everything is a lie when they disagree with it?

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 3:51 pm    

Yeah, you can tell from my post that I was throwing a fit. Geez, I need to learn how to calm down. I gave calm responses that you didn't want to hear and suddenly im throwing a fit.....

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kyre
Commodore


Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 1263

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 4:04 pm    

Founder wrote:
I never saw it. I did see Farenhype 9/11 and it basically disaproved everything in the movie. So I didn't bother watching it.


But if you haven't actually seen it, how can you be so sure that everything was disproven?

I haven't seen either of them, yet.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 4:11 pm    

Kyre wrote:
Founder wrote:
I never saw it. I did see Farenhype 9/11 and it basically disaproved everything in the movie. So I didn't bother watching it.


But if you haven't actually seen it, how can you be so sure that everything was disproven?

I haven't seen either of them, yet.


Well the purpose of Farenhype 9/11 was showing the many inaccuriaces of Moore's movie. It showed each scene or sequance of Fahrenheit 9/11 and then showed how it was a lie. It may have not gone over every scene though.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
The Delta Flyer
Commodore


Joined: 08 Apr 2002
Posts: 2163
Location: East Yorkshire

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 5:22 pm    

Whilst I'm not particularly a fan of George Bush, I really can't stand Michael Moore - he (as far as I know) exagerated and didn't go into some of the things into as much depth as he did some other issues and was overly self-righteous. If Bush hadn't have been relected, I can see Moore taking alot of credit for it himself.

It seemed like Moore's little anti-Bush video rather than a professional film if you ask me.

I prefer Moore's other documentary "Bowling for Columbine" so if you've not seen that one, give it a try.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSat Feb 26, 2005 5:54 pm    

If you've seen Fahrenheit 9/11, you should also see Fahrenhype. Perhaps add some balance?


And yeah, what could Bush have done in seven minutes? Maybe gotten to Air Force One seven minutes earlier? It's not as if he really could have done anything in the first place.



-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kyle Reese
Cadet Gunnery Sergeant


Joined: 21 Apr 2003
Posts: 5672
Location: The United States of America

PostSun Feb 27, 2005 12:02 am    

I haven't seen either, but I'd like to see em. Fahrenheit so I can sit there and laugh at it's apparent stupidity.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Birdy
Socialist


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 13502
Location: Here.

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 7:45 am    

I've seen it too. I was totally blown away. I saw Bowling For Columbine also, but Fahrenheit 9/11 was much more impressive.
Exactly, I agree on what you say Jeff. That the men in the congress don't want to have their sons in the army, all the poor people have to defend the country. Really weird.

I'm really looking forward too to see his sequal



-------signature-------

Nosce te ipsum

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 3:28 pm    

How interesting that it wasn't nominated even for best documentary.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Leo Wyatt
Sweetest Angel


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 19045
Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 3:59 pm    

It shouldn't been nominated. I know there is nobody on base where I am at that bought the movie thank God. Everybody walks by it and is ashamed that PX has it there.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 6:07 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
How interesting that it wasn't nominated even for best documentary.


didn't it have something to do with Moore wanting it on DVD so quickly I thought I heard something about that.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Leah Manzer
Vice Admiral


Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Posts: 5221
Location: State of Insanity

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 6:39 pm    

I really liked it. I think he went over board with the bush bashing (and I'm not a fan of bush myself). It was well done other then that though. I think you shouldnt bash it until you've seen it, especially if you have only seen the counter to it.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostMon Feb 28, 2005 7:15 pm    

Jeff Miller wrote:
IntrepidIsMe wrote:
How interesting that it wasn't nominated even for best documentary.


didn't it have something to do with Moore wanting it on DVD so quickly I thought I heard something about that.


Well, Ray was out before the Academy Awards. Am not too sure.



-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostWed Mar 02, 2005 2:10 am    

Founder wrote:
Well the purpose of Farenhype 9/11 was showing the many inaccuriaces of Moore's movie.

Unfortunately, that's not true. Moore's movie was the result of work he has been doing for years: making documentaries.

Farenhype 9/11 was an anxious attempt of the Republicans to get back the votes Moore tooke from them.

Moore's intention was to tell the truth, Farenhype's intention was just to refute the facts of Farenheit 9/11.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Founder
Dominion Leader


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 12755
Location: Gamma Quadrant

PostThu Mar 03, 2005 2:14 am    

m021 wrote:
Founder wrote:
Well the purpose of Farenhype 9/11 was showing the many inaccuriaces of Moore's movie.

Unfortunately, that's not true. Moore's movie was the result of work he has been doing for years: making documentaries.

Farenhype 9/11 was an anxious attempt of the Republicans to get back the votes Moore tooke from them.

Moore's intention was to tell the truth, Farenhype's intention was just to refute the facts of Farenheit 9/11.


No, unfortunetly for YOU it is true. Years? It if took years for him to make up lies and stretch the truth, then hes a bigger idiot than I thought. Anxious attempt? Uh huh....."The facts of Farenheight 9/11"? Those words don't go together.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostFri Mar 04, 2005 9:50 am    

Founder wrote:
Anxious attempt?

Yeah I know, I didn't remember the right word.

Quote:
Years? It if took years for him to make up lies and stretch the truth

Try and read better. I said he's been making documentaries for years, not that he worked on F911 for years.

But if you seriously think that none of the things in Farenheit 9/11 are true, you're not of this world. Heck, what do I say, you're from America.

Have you noticed how many Americans who emigrated to Europe have voted Kerry? If you look to America from Europe, you'll see the real facts.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostFri Mar 04, 2005 4:30 pm    

Leaving because you don't get your way just shows immaturity. And look at how many things Fahrenhype 9/11 disproved. How ignorant to take people at their face value and just go with what you want to hear.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostFri Mar 04, 2005 6:07 pm    

Founder wrote:
I never saw it. I did see Farenhype 9/11 and it basically disaproved everything in the movie. So I didn't bother watching it.

I love when people get upset about the Bush sitting for a full seven minutes. Seven minutes!? Dear God.....He could have prevented the entire attack. What Moore's movie DOESN'T tell you, im sure, is that he was told not to rush out of there. But whatever. Actually a few congressmen did say yes but Moore hit the edit button and suddenly not one did. Moore is notorious for editing his movies. There is no draft. This lday should have told her son to come home. If he chose to defend his nation, then that isn't the President's fault. He was a good man. Now im sure you'll dislike my views and thats ok. Im not asking you to beleive me. Yes this movie was very popular for its hard hitting Journalism. Im assuming the sequal will be about the same stuff. It will probably be as popular if not more. I believe Moore won an award for this movie too.


Actually, no. HE told them not to react, getting out his legal pad. Otherwise, what you say is true. But WHAT would you guys have wanted him to do? Jump out of his seat, rip off his shirt, "Let the bullets hit me first!" There was, really, nothing that he COULD do. What could he have done, hmm? Alarm the children? That's about it

Kyre wrote:
Founder wrote:
I never saw it. I did see Farenhype 9/11 and it basically disaproved everything in the movie. So I didn't bother watching it.


But if you haven't actually seen it, how can you be so sure that everything was disproven?

I haven't seen either of them, yet.


I saw BOTH Farenheit and Farenhype. I know that Founder is RIGHT.

m021 wrote:
Founder wrote:
Well the purpose of Farenhype 9/11 was showing the many inaccuriaces of Moore's movie.

Unfortunately, that's not true. Moore's movie was the result of work he has been doing for years: making documentaries.

Farenhype 9/11 was an anxious attempt of the Republicans to get back the votes Moore tooke from them.

Moore's intention was to tell the truth, Farenhype's intention was just to refute the facts of Farenheit 9/11.


Yep, sure. Enjoying the Kool Aide over there?
1. No, it was not a documentary. My Liberal (quite left wing, enough to believe that we should be attacked first before defending) Speech and Debate team Captain attests to that.
2. He took FEW votes from them.
3. HYPE WAS a documentary. Moore's was not. It was NOT an "anxious attempt of the Republicans to get back the votes Moore tooke from them." That's just a load of crap. FACTS? What FACTS? Watch BOTH, and then form an opinion. Founder, you should too

m021 wrote:
Founder wrote:
Anxious attempt?

Yeah I know, I didn't remember the right word.

Quote:
Years? It if took years for him to make up lies and stretch the truth

Try and read better. I said he's been making documentaries for years, not that he worked on F911 for years.

But if you seriously think that none of the things in Farenheit 9/11 are true, you're not of this world. Heck, what do I say, you're from America.

Have you noticed how many Americans who emigrated to Europe have voted Kerry? If you look to America from Europe, you'll see the real facts.


It's pointless. Kool Aide. Like it?



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
m021
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

PostSat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 am    

Republican_Man wrote:
enough to believe that we should be attacked first before defending

You know, there are even international agreements/laws saying a nation should be under attack first before defending. That's not being left wing, that's respecting the laws (and in my opinion, being fair, but that's just my view).

And what is "Kool Aide" anyway?


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Mar 07, 2005 7:12 pm    

m021 wrote:
Republican_Man wrote:
enough to believe that we should be attacked first before defending

You know, there are even international agreements/laws saying a nation should be under attack first before defending. That's not being left wing, that's respecting the laws (and in my opinion, being fair, but that's just my view).

And what is "Kool Aide" anyway?


1. Not quite, but either way, it IS a liberal law if it is real.
2. Kool Aid is a juice-like drink here in the US. There is a whole story behind a man (I forget the story...) who was blindly following a RADICAL (and I mean radical) ideology. Therefore, a Kool Aid drinker is one who is blindly following an ideology.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
masaka18
Captain


Joined: 19 Jul 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Oregon city Oregon

PostTue Mar 08, 2005 5:49 am    

i didnt like this movie, quite boring if you ask me. though alot of people would like it, its not my kind of movie


-------signature-------

all logic is flawless untill you use it

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page 1, 2  Next
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com