| Do like the U.S.S Voyager |
| Yes |
|
90% |
[ 37 ] |
| No |
|
7% |
[ 3 ] |
| Don't know |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 41 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Iqqe
Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 203
Location: Deck 1, ready room onboard USS Enterprise NCC-1701-F
|
 Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:50 pm |
|
About the torpedo problem. Obvisouly the crew was able to manufacture their own photon torpedoes. I mean, if they are capable of builing all those shuttles and modifying photons to a 80 isotion torpedo I think it is possible. Never underestimate the resourcefullness of the Voayer crew. 
|
|
|
captin jayneway
Lieutenant
Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 223
Location: liverpool
|
| Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:50 am |
|
Yeah. Voyager is a really great vessle...plus it looks amazing ! i really like it !
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Wed Jun 15, 2005 7:57 pm |
|
| Quote: | Voyager has:
15 Decks
13 Type VIII Phaser arrays
4 Photon Torpedo tubes
38 class VI photon torpedos (Normal intrepid classes have 40 torpedoes)
2 Tri-colbolt devices
normal cruise warp 6
can easily sustain a maximum speed of warp 9.975 for quite a long time.
standard level structural integrity feild.
single hull (No armor like the Enterprise & defiant)
is a "Relitivly small science vessel"
Is 2rd built in it's class
was commisioned 2371
has 2 holodecks
3 transproter rooms
at least 3 cargo bays
modifiable warp neccels
retracting neccels which helps create a stable warp field and doesn't damage subspace as much as other classes.
Standard shield system (modifyd many times in on there journey home)
Has approximately 2 Type 9 shuttle craft, 1 Type 8 shuttle craft & Tom Paris's "Delta Flyer"
(My typing errors have been fixed) |
It's spelled "Nacelles"
|
|
|
Cap. Proton
Master Chief
Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 1490
Location: U.S.S. Braveheart
|
| Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:06 am |
|
| Iqqe wrote: | | there's like a hole or something just right above the port aft torpedo tube and they fires phasers from there in a number of episodes. |
That's true Voyager has 5 torpedo tubes.
| Iqqe wrote: | | Voyager's top speed is somewhat lower than warp 9.975. Voyager has never achieved that velocity. |
That's not true. The maximum speed was around 9.985 for 1 hour.[/quote]
-------signature-------
For all the RPG'rs out here:
Join the SDTF
|
|
|
~Voyager Fanatic~
Super Genius
Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 1787
|
| Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:01 am |
|
Information on Voyager:
Federation starship, Intrepid class, Starfleet registry number NCC-74656, commanded by Captain Kathryn Janeway. Voyager had a gross mass of 700,000 metric tons and was 15 decks thick. The ship had a complement of 38 photon torpedoes as of stardate 48546.2. Voyager had a crew complement of 141 and had a sustainable cruising velocity of warp factor 9.975. The ship featured improved computer systems in which some traditionel optical processors where replaced with bio-neural circuitry. Voyager was also equipped with conventional isolinear optical circuits. The Bridge was lacated on Deck 1, while the mess hall was located one level down on Deck 2, Section 13. Deck 4 had cargo bay facilities. The shuttlebay was located on Deck 12. Voyager had the capability of landing on the surface of a Class-M planet, then returning to space.
In 2371 the Voyager was violently propelled into the Delta Quadrant by a powerful displacement wave generated by the Caretaker. Stranded some 70,000 light-years from home, Captain Janeway invited the crew of a similarly stranded Maquis vessel to join the Voyager crew, and asked Maquis officer Chakotay to serve as her second-in-command. At the time Voyager was swept into the Delta Quadrant, it had been on a mission to pursue Chakotay's ship. Voyager lost contact with Starfleet on stardate 48307.5. Ironically, the missin to pursue Chakotay's Maquis ship was supposed to have lasted only three weeks. In late 2371, the Voyager had a crew of 152. A minimum of 100 people was normaly required to operate the vessel successfully.
The Starship Voyager had no counselor aboard. Cabin 125-A on Deck 2 was originally designated as the captain's private dining room. Because power availability was limited after the ship was stranded in the Delta Quadrant, the crew adopted a system of replicator-usage rationing in order to conserve energy. As part of this effort, Neelix converted part of the mess hall into a makeshift kitchen, where he prepared a wide range of delicacies for the crew. Voyager had a Stellar Cartography Department. The warp core on Voyager was ejected on stardate 48734, when Chakotay sought to prevent the ship from entering a nebula inhabited by the Komar. The core was subsequently recoverd and reinstalled. An exact duplicate of the Voyager was created by a spatial scission on stardate 49548.7 after the ship entered a plasma drift containing a subspace divergence field. In order to prevent her ship from being taken over by Vidiians, the Captain Janeway in command of the duplicate Voyager ordered it to self-destruct. Her place in history is secure alongside the likes of the Wright Flyer and the Saturn V.
Information from http://www.startrek.nl/index.php
-------signature-------
Disembodiment is the epitome of perfection...
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:38 pm |
|
| Cap. Proton wrote: | | The maximum speed was around 9.985 for 1 hour |
I can tell you straight up from memory that's not correct. Maximum speed is Warp 9.975 for approx. 12 hours.
| Cap. Proton wrote: | | That's true Voyager has 5 torpedo tubes. |
Incorrect. Voyager has 4 torpedo tubes. Two facing forward, two facing aft.
| ~Voyager Fanatic~ wrote: | | The shuttlebay was located on Deck 12 |
Where ever you got this from, is wrong. I know that the shuttle bay is on Deck 10.
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
councmatt
Commander
Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 453
Location: Elm Park - London
|
| Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:28 pm |
|
voyager is a great ship and obvisously the best!
Voyager had 38 class 6 photon torpedos
and im not to shore but i do believe it had only 4 phaser erays.
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:28 pm |
|
I don't know about arrays... 4 sounds like it might be right. But it had 13 phaser strips. I know if you go somewhere it'll say like, 11, I think. But there's two that they are missing that are BLATANTLY obvious.
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
Cap. Proton
Master Chief
Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 1490
Location: U.S.S. Braveheart
|
| Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:39 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | Cap. Proton wrote: | | The maximum speed was around 9.985 for 1 hour |
I can tell you straight up from memory that's not correct. Maximum speed is Warp 9.975 for approx. 12 hours. |
No that's the specifications from Utopia Shipyards, 9.985 for 1 hours is highest rated.
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | Cap. Proton wrote: | | That's true Voyager has 5 torpedo tubes. |
Incorrect. Voyager has 4 torpedo tubes. Two facing forward, two facing aft. |
Sorry mistake I made in messing up two ships
Anyway Voyager rocks
-------signature-------
For all the RPG'rs out here:
Join the SDTF
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:54 am |
|
| Cap. Proton wrote: | | No that's the specifications from Utopia Shipyards, 9.985 for 1 hours is highest rated. |
Where in the OFFICIAL star trek records does it say that? I've never heard it, and doubt that it's for real. If it were 9.985, for however short a time, when asked on the show they would have said 9.985, not 9.975.
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
| Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:22 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | Cap. Proton wrote: | | No that's the specifications from Utopia Shipyards, 9.985 for 1 hours is highest rated. |
Where in the OFFICIAL star trek records does it say that? I've never heard it, and doubt that it's for real. If it were 9.985, for however short a time, when asked on the show they would have said 9.985, not 9.975. |
Well you have to speculate. The ship could probally travel 9.99 for 5 minutes (which is higher than specification) if it wanted to, but would probally not be recommended because of extreme risk, and possible engine damage.
It would also probally depend on how well in tune the engines are.
|
|
|
Cap. Proton
Master Chief
Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 1490
Location: U.S.S. Braveheart
|
| Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:34 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | Cap. Proton wrote: | | No that's the specifications from Utopia Shipyards, 9.985 for 1 hours is highest rated. |
Where in the OFFICIAL star trek records does it say that? I've never heard it, and doubt that it's for real. If it were 9.985, for however short a time, when asked on the show they would have said 9.985, not 9.975. |
Does it really matter? Voyager rock whatever it goes 9.975 or 9.985
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:22 pm |
|
| PrankishSmart wrote: | | Well you have to speculate. The ship could probally travel 9.99 for 5 minutes (which is higher than specification) if it wanted to, but would probally not be recommended because of extreme risk, and possible engine damage. |
Exactly. Which is why they wouldn't do it, which is why the ship can't go that fast, which is why it is not part of the specifications. Because it can't go that fast.
| Cap. Proton wrote: | | Does it really matter? Voyager rock whatever it goes 9.975 or 9.985 |
Yes it really does matter. To me at least it does. There are specifications for a reason.
Yes, Voyager would TOTALLY rock no matter what.
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:21 pm |
|
It matters because, for some people, only canon information should be considered unless absolutely no canon information is available on the subject. Then the person has to decide whether to admit speculation from non-canon sources. 
I personally prefer canon over anything else, foremost, but will accept reasonable and reliable non-canon information if I happen to need it for something.
|
|
|
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
| Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:42 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | Exactly. Which is why they wouldn't do it, which is why the ship can't go that fast, which is why it is not part of the specifications. Because it can't go that fast. |
Yeah, except in emergencys. In the very first episode of TNG, the enterprise travelled in excess of warp 9.7, which is warp .5 over the MAX specifications. I think data did say something about extreme risk although it is so long ago since I saw the episode.
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:47 pm |
|
| PrankishSmart wrote: | | Yeah, except in emergencys. In the very first episode of TNG, the enterprise travelled in excess of warp 9.7, which is warp .5 over the MAX specifications. I think data did say something about extreme risk although it is so long ago since I saw the episode. |
Well, not even really in emergencies...b/c when Voyager was trying to catch up to Tom's shuttle in "Threshold" they barely got up to warp 9.975, their maximum speed without the ship shaking and shuttering.
And as for TNG, no, 9.7 was not .5 above the max specs. The Max specs is 9.6, as follows.
It's a hyperlink. Click to make bigger.
| Hitchhiker wrote: | It matters because, for some people, only canon information should be considered unless absolutely no canon information is available on the subject. Then the person has to decide whether to admit speculation from non-canon sources. :wink:
I personally prefer canon over anything else, foremost, but will accept reasonable and reliable non-canon information if I happen to need it for something |
Yes, I do much prefer canon info over ANY non-canon info. But other things, such as what has happened to the crew and ship after the Series Finale, like Golden's books, I know they're not canon, but I read them as if they were, knowing full well that they may later be proven not anything like what Trek really had in mind for them...it just all depends. But yes, canon info is the best.
|
|
|
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral
Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.
|
| Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:12 am |
|
| Voyager2004 wrote: | | And as for TNG, no, 9.7 was not .5 above the max specs. The Max specs is 9.6, as follows. |
The enterprise begun with it's maximum warp as 9.2. Half way through the series during a refit the maximum warp was increased to 9.6. Also remember at the time the enterprise was brand new. At the time voyager 'struggled' to reach 9.975, the ship had been in the DQ for some time, without access to a shipyard for maintenence.
|
|
|
Voyager2004
Commodore
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 2070
Location: Silverdale, WA
|
| Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:15 pm |
|
| PrankishSmart wrote: | | The enterprise begun with it's maximum warp as 9.2. Half way through the series during a refit the maximum warp was increased to 9.6. Also remember at the time the enterprise was brand new. At the time voyager 'struggled' to reach 9.975, the ship had been in the DQ for some time, without access to a shipyard for maintenence. |
Where oh where, does anything say that halfway through the series there was a warp refit that increased the factor by .4?
And as for Voyager, no it hadn't... Voyager had been in the DQ for barely a year. Don't give me that "no shipyard" excuse.
-------signature-------
"We all make our own Hell, Mr. Lessing. I hope you enjoy yours."
Kathryn Janeway - Equinox Pt 2
|
|
|
~Voyager Fan~
Captain's Assistant
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Location: On board voyager assisting the captain
|
| Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:35 am |
|
the info always keep changing but u can go google and search " janet's voyager site" her site has alot nice things
-------signature-------
Starfleet Command-
"You're not alone...."
Message in a Bottle
|
|
|
Lt Cmdr Murray
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 06 Nov 2005
Posts: 87
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:48 pm Lt Cmdr Murray |
|
Yes I like USS Voyager. I like the way then warp necelles turn up when they're engaged. Also like how they're able to land on a planet if necessary.
|
|
|
Captain Hawk
Sophomore Cadet
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 14
Location: Delta Quadrant
|
| Mon May 01, 2006 7:29 pm USS Voyager |
|
U.S.S. Voyager - NCC-74656
Commissioned on Stardate 48038.5 (2371)
Constructed At: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Launched From: Earth Station McKinley
Launched From Deep Space Nine On First Mission
Voyager was the first ship to be fitted with a Class-9 Warp Drive
The Intrepid-class utilizes a duranium hull structure, a plasma-based power distribution system, and tricyclic life-support systems.
Voyager was one of the first ships to be fitted with an EMH
Voyagers newer warp drive meant that Voyager could exceed the warp 5/6(cant remember which) speed limit becuase its warp drive doesnt damage subspace that much.
|
|
|
La Forge
Bajoran Colonel
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 2125
Location: Babylon 5
|
| Mon May 01, 2006 7:32 pm |
|
| Quote: | | You just need to know that everyone here lovs it |
Uhhh...wha? I don't...in fact...I hate it...heh...
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
