Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:43 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Should the RAF be disbanded?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Should the Royal Air Force be disbanded?
Yes
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
No
100%
 100%  [ 16 ]
Total Votes : 16

Author Message
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostWed Jan 05, 2005 3:16 pm    Should the RAF be disbanded?

Rumours still persist of talks about the RAF being disbanded. I know that the British goverment wants to make cuts but is this a cut too far?

It may happen. It may not. What do you all think?

The Royal Air Force was formed in 1918 when the Army's Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service were amalgamated. Prior to this, I think it made sense for the Army and the Navy to have their own Air Fleets.

But amalgamating the two into the RAF made perfect sense and I see no reason to disband. Some people have suggested that the RAF be disbanded and replaced by a Naval Fleet Air Arm and an Army Air Force. Some people feel this could be done to prevent the cuts that have been talked about within Britain's armed forces.

We NEED the RAF and I find it shocking to be honest that public figures would even suggest disbanding it. And let's not forget that the RAF is more than just planes blowing things up. They perform vital rescue work and have been at the scene of many major rescue operations. They also undertake a lot of humanitarian tasks.

If cuts need to be made, then I have an idea. How about "cutting down" on the amount of politicians, quangos and bureaucratic public sector jobs that cost billions in taxes. Make the cuts there instead of in the Armed Forces, filled with thousands of brave men and women.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostWed Jan 05, 2005 4:32 pm    

If they get rid of the RAF they would be MAD!! Who would get rid of the air force. Not very good if u need to shoot somthing down or are faced with invasion, which we have done many a time.

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kyre
Commodore


Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 1263

PostWed Jan 05, 2005 5:31 pm    

If it wasn't for my poor eyesight, I'd be training to be a pilot in the RAF right now. It's all I ever wanted to do sicne I was about eight years old. Would be gutted if they disbanded it.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostWed Jan 05, 2005 5:53 pm    

Well, I'm glad that I come back a few hours later and that there are no "yes" votes.

I think we need an Air Force more than ever, with the way the world is. You never know where the next threat is coming from or who we may have to defend against next. People used to say that when the Cold War ended, we should cut down on intelligence organisations and cut down on the armed forces. Yet, it truly is a never-ending battle. World War 2 ended but threats to peace didn't. And the end of the Cold War didn't mean the end of threats to peace.

One minister here said that consideration would be given to cutting down on personnel within the Armed Forces and investing more in technology. He implied that the world is different and technology is the way forward. Yes, it is. But you still NEED people to operate the technology, you still NEED people to lead and command people who operate the technology. You still NEED people who can make decisions on how to utilize the technology.

Maybe in the future, we could even have a jet that doesn't need a pilot to fight a war. But even if that happens, I bet it wouldn't be half as good as a flesh-and-bones pilot. Machines have their function but real, living, breathing people are what is needed to fight a war and perform peacekeeping/humanitarian tasks.

And, as I touched upon earlier, combat is only one of many roles that the Armed Forces undertaker. Humanitarian tasks, peacekeeping, building infrastructure in war-torn countries - they are all roles that the RAF and other forces undertake.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 1:45 am    

Why would they disband the RAF? They know well its a very bad move knowing that fact that if they do disband it, the chance of lets say an air attack on the UK would become almost impossible to stop.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 2:03 am    

Its 10-0 for not disbanding the RAF. Awesome.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Hitchhiker
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 8:32 am    

::bumps it to 11-0::

Not only is it still a line of defense, as mentioned, but it's a cultural symbol now, part of your heritage.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 10:14 am    

I voted against it. I love flying, and am considering joining the RAF at some time in the future. I'm not certain about it though. They have already cut back a lot on the RAF's funding. The Rapier (a SAM system) has already been cut, and it's widely considered the best SAM in the world. Also it's a bit pointless paying all the money on the Eurofighters and then not using them.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 1:23 pm    

12-0.

I'm still reeling from such proposals, although disbanding the RAF has been talked about before. I shall oppose it in any way I can if they go ahead with it and I know a lot of other people would too.

Jeremy, what trade were you looking to enter?


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Tomtekuk
Junior Cadet


Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 17

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 4:37 pm    

I think Yes and No.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 4:53 pm    

Could you elaborate on that, please?

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CJ Cregg
Commodore


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 1254

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 5:09 pm    

The world can change overnight u never know what could happen. thats why we need a military still. we will ALWAYS need one ever if then entire world was at peace

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 5:14 pm    

charmed88 wrote:
The world can change overnight u never know what could happen. thats why we need a military still. we will ALWAYS need one ever if then entire world was at peace


Very true. This tragic tsunami act has shown us that, even if there was no war, the military can still play a role in humanitarian tasks.

You have some countries, like Switzerland, who never fight in wars but their Armed Forces perform many essential tasks. It's sad but I feel that politicians fail to grasp the scope of our Armed Forces work, there is so much more to them than combat. Combat aside, you have the Army who perform humanitarian and peacekeeping tasks. The Royal Navy perform a lot of scientific work to benefit mankind and the R.A.F. are essential when it comes to rescue work.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 6:27 pm    

Starfleet Dentist wrote:
12-0.

I'm still reeling from such proposals, although disbanding the RAF has been talked about before. I shall oppose it in any way I can if they go ahead with it and I know a lot of other people would too.

Jeremy, what trade were you looking to enter?


I would be going as a pilot. Always been interested in airplanes and know lots about them, at least military ones. I think I would do something like flying helicopters or transport planes such as Hercules's, as although I would like to fly fast jets I wouldn't like to kill probably.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Superman
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 10220

PostThu Jan 06, 2005 7:10 pm    

Well, let us know how you get on, Jeremy.

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com