| Author |
Message |
Kyre
Commodore
Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 1263
|
 Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:22 pm |
|
| Republican_Man wrote: | | I disagree with that. You have to open your mind to an alternate definition of a World War. |
There have been two world wars in the history of humanity. Both of these involved millions of troops, fighting across entire countries, with millions of lives eventually being lost. Why would a third world war move away from this description?
The third world war will involve nukes, nukes and more nukes. We wont have the luxury of arguing if it's the real deal when the *beep* hits the fan.
And the Oil for Food program was setup so that Iraq could buy itself provisions by selling some of it's oil. But Saddam used some loopholes and made himself a fortune, when he should have been using the money gained to help his people.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
