Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:07 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Who won the first debate?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Who do you think won the first Presidential debate?
President George W. Bush
17%
 17%  [ 3 ]
Senator John Kerry
64%
 64%  [ 11 ]
They were evenly matched
17%
 17%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 17

Author Message
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSat Oct 02, 2004 3:59 pm    

Kerry clearly won because he pointed out every mistake made by Bush using actual proof.

And if you watch Bushs face you can tell he did not want to hear anything that was coming out of Kerry mouth because the truth of many issues like the war in Iraq was I as I would say "embrassing for the record"

As Kerry says "How can you say things are getting better when the death toll of American Soldiers keep rising every month in Iraq." (Not exact but close to it)


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostSat Oct 02, 2004 4:41 pm    

borgslayer wrote:
Kerry clearly won because he pointed out every mistake made by Bush using actual proof.

And if you watch Bushs face you can tell he did not want to hear anything that was coming out of Kerry mouth because the truth of many issues like the war in Iraq was I as I would say "embrassing for the record"

As Kerry says "How can you say things are getting better when the death toll of American Soldiers keep rising every month in Iraq." (Not exact but close to it)


Okay, no offense to soldiers. You can bet I honor thier memory as much as anyone ese. But you consider that in Vietnam (...or was it Korea? ...don't hold me to which country...) we lost 5,000 soldiers a year. We're doing pretty well on that front. Any loss of life is cause for mourning. But that's war.

"The truth" was not necessarily the truth. Nor were Kerry's recomendations necessarily good choices. A man on Fox news (Again, don't catch me on names, here! ) said, "Kerry had a deep argument, but it was deeply incorrect." (Or something to that effect) And I don't know why people jump on facial expressions like that. It's understandable. So, he's agravated with Kerry. So'm I.

And what proof? What exactly did he point out? He saw the same intelligence Bush did, he voted in support of the war (When it suited his political purposes). I WISH Bush would have pointed out more clearly that with all Kerry's back-and-forth on what was right or wrong that you CANNOT make those kind of mistakes and changes of judgement while being president! If Kerry wanted to show what a strong president he would be, he should have voted that way. Let us be glad he is one senator of a hundred.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSat Oct 02, 2004 7:28 pm    

Exalya wrote:
borgslayer wrote:
Kerry clearly won because he pointed out every mistake made by Bush using actual proof.

And if you watch Bushs face you can tell he did not want to hear anything that was coming out of Kerry mouth because the truth of many issues like the war in Iraq was I as I would say "embrassing for the record"

As Kerry says "How can you say things are getting better when the death toll of American Soldiers keep rising every month in Iraq." (Not exact but close to it)


Okay, no offense to soldiers. You can bet I honor thier memory as much as anyone ese. But you consider that in Vietnam (...or was it Korea? ...don't hold me to which country...) we lost 5,000 soldiers a year. We're doing pretty well on that front. Any loss of life is cause for mourning. But that's war.

"The truth" was not necessarily the truth. Nor were Kerry's recomendations necessarily good choices. A man on Fox news (Again, don't catch me on names, here! ) said, "Kerry had a deep argument, but it was deeply incorrect." (Or something to that effect) And I don't know why people jump on facial expressions like that. It's understandable. So, he's agravated with Kerry. So'm I.

And what proof? What exactly did he point out? He saw the same intelligence Bush did, he voted in support of the war (When it suited his political purposes). I WISH Bush would have pointed out more clearly that with all Kerry's back-and-forth on what was right or wrong that you CANNOT make those kind of mistakes and changes of judgement while being president! If Kerry wanted to show what a strong president he would be, he should have voted that way. Let us be glad he is one senator of a hundred.


EXACTLY. I couldn't have said it better myself. And Kerry was SO misleading, too.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kyre
Commodore


Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Posts: 1263

PostSun Oct 03, 2004 10:24 am    

charmed88 wrote:
Kyre wrote:
Elections are all about style, and that's it. Tony Blair promised the banning of fox hunting with dogs, in the run up to the 1997 General Election. He became Prime Minister, not solely due to that promise, but I digress. It is now 2004 and fox hunting with dogs is still legal.


There have been several votes in the commons pushing this through but it keeps getting rejected by the unelected house of lords. Blame the lord not blair for it still being legal


If Blair had really wanted it passed as quickly as he made out, he would have used the power that the Commons has over the Lords to get it through.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostSun Oct 03, 2004 3:27 pm    

Bah! Whats up with this campaign?

When Democrats are telling the truth the Republicans are all the sudden calling actual facts misleading.

When Republicans are telling some truth to a story all of the Democrats are calling in Smear Campaign.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com