Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 10:35 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
<Kerry>
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Toad
Chief of Security


Joined: 28 Aug 2003
Posts: 936
Location: The Great Plains

PostMon Aug 30, 2004 6:03 pm    <Kerry>

Quote:
Did you see this in the papers?

There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq during the month of January...In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the Month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war torn country of Iraq .

When some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war, we state the following...
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.

From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea . North Korea never attacked us.
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,334 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.
From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us.
He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing.
Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us President Bush has:
liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya , Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...
it took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51-day operation.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida !!!!

Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a GREAT JOB! The Military moral is high!
The biased media hopes we are too ignorant to realize the facts.

Copy and Paste to PASS IT ON.



Annonymous Email


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Aug 30, 2004 6:04 pm    

Ooooooooh! GREAT stuff! Good points!


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
borgslayer
Rear Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 2646
Location: Las Vegas

PostMon Aug 30, 2004 6:14 pm    

I can agree with you.

But however I do not agree with Bush lowering the number of troops around the world.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Theresa
Lux Mihi Deus


Joined: 17 Jun 2001
Posts: 27256
Location: United States of America

PostMon Aug 30, 2004 7:17 pm    

^That was one of the things that got Bush elected in the first place. Then we have nitwits saying, "Oh, he didn't do that, he sent out more troops." Well duh, we were attacked, in case you missed that. (not directed at one person)


Kerry:




-------signature-------

Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Aug 30, 2004 8:50 pm    

Theresa wrote:
^That was one of the things that got Bush elected in the first place. Then we have nitwits saying, "Oh, he didn't do that, he sent out more troops." Well duh, we were attacked, in case you missed that. (not directed at one person)


Kerry:



lol , that's great! And yes, that's true but...

Quote:
But however I do not agree with Bush lowering the number of troops around the world.

We are now fighting terrorism, and so we have to bring many of our troops abroad home on standbye.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Delta Quad 2003
Section 31 Guardian


Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 3164
Location: Earth

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 7:49 am    

While I tend to agree, Theresa is correct. One of the reasons Bush is in the house now is for his military promises. What he is doing is right, and there is evidence to back this up. Iraq is still not totally ready for self governing, in fact it is far from it. However, it is closer than it was a few months ago. We were attacked, and that means that we HAVE to retalliate. If we don't do this, we are leaving ourselves open to more devastating attacks. Bush's decision to go in and get the job done then and there, squashing the Taliban and like the article said, "Crippling Al-Queda", was a great decision. Why do we pester a man about what doing something we elected him to do?


-------signature-------

Caboose - I can't feel my face.
Church - Shut up caboose!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Toad
Chief of Security


Joined: 28 Aug 2003
Posts: 936
Location: The Great Plains

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 3:34 pm    

Delta Quad 2003 wrote:
While I tend to agree, Theresa is correct. One of the reasons Bush is in the house now is for his military promises. What he is doing is right, and there is evidence to back this up. Iraq is still not totally ready for self governing, in fact it is far from it. However, it is closer than it was a few months ago. We were attacked, and that means that we HAVE to retalliate. If we don't do this, we are leaving ourselves open to more devastating attacks. Bush's decision to go in and get the job done then and there, squashing the Taliban and like the article said, "Crippling Al-Queda", was a great decision. Why do we pester a man about what doing something we elected him to do?


Good point


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 7:07 pm    

Theresa wrote:
Kerry:



Oh yeah? AT LEAST KERRY DOESNT FLIP OFF HIS SUPPORTERS. Boo yah.



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 8:36 pm    

Delta Quad 2003 wrote:
While I tend to agree, Theresa is correct. One of the reasons Bush is in the house now is for his military promises. What he is doing is right, and there is evidence to back this up. Iraq is still not totally ready for self governing, in fact it is far from it. However, it is closer than it was a few months ago. We were attacked, and that means that we HAVE to retalliate. If we don't do this, we are leaving ourselves open to more devastating attacks. Bush's decision to go in and get the job done then and there, squashing the Taliban and like the article said, "Crippling Al-Queda", was a great decision. Why do we pester a man about what doing something we elected him to do?


Ah, good point.

Defiant wrote:
Theresa wrote:
Kerry:



Oh yeah? AT LEAST KERRY DOESNT FLIP OFF HIS SUPPORTERS. Boo yah.



You know that's cruel and not true.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 8:43 pm    

YAH I KNOW. The waffle thing is totally uncalled for. Im glad you agree RM.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 8:46 pm    

Defiant wrote:
YAH I KNOW. The waffle thing is totally uncalled for. Im glad you agree RM.


I was talking about the Bush middle-finger deal, not the waffling. If you guys can show comparisons of Bush and Hitler, the waffling picture is acceptable. (For the most part) But that middle finger deal is NOT.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 9:36 pm    

I show no comparison of Bush and Hitler. None whatsoever.

And you need to take it easy homie. Its all a joke. Ill have the Kerry one done soon.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 9:59 pm    

Defiant wrote:
I show no comparison of Bush and Hitler. None whatsoever.

And you need to take it easy homie. Its all a joke. Ill have the Kerry one done soon.


I'm sure you will, but either way, Kerry nor Bush, but especially Bush because he's a sitting President, such things are horrible. And I didn't say--or mean--that you compared them, but MoveOn.org and others have.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostTue Aug 31, 2004 10:01 pm    

Well thats their problem, dont yell at me for their blatant stupidity.

I couldnt care less who the sitting president is. And know this, he wont be sitting for long.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com