Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:46 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Iraqis Get Legal Custody of Saddam
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Should Saddam's trial be televised?
Yes, it should be aired internationally.
66%
 66%  [ 6 ]
Yes, it should be aired in Iraq.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
No, not at all.
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
Other
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author Message
Puck
The Texan


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 5596

PostWed Jun 30, 2004 10:51 am    Iraqis Get Legal Custody of Saddam

Quote:

Iraqis Get Legal Custody of Saddam

Wednesday, June 30, 2004



BAGHDAD, Iraq � The new Iraqi government now has legal custody over the dictator who ruled the nation for three decades � Saddam Hussein (search).

Besides Saddam, the United States also turned over custody of 11 of his deputies. On Thursday, Saddam and the others are expected to be formally charged with crimes against Iraq.

In Saddam's case, the charges are expected to include the massacre of Kurds (search) in 1988 and the invasion of Kuwait two years later.

The 12 suspects will appear in a courthouse with a prominent clock tower inside Baghdad's sealed-off Green Zone (search). It will be filmed for public release.

The images will be the first the public will see of Saddam since his Dec. 13 capture by U.S. soldiers, when a clip showed the bushy-bearded leader opening his mouth for a dental examination.

Saddam will remain in an American-controlled jail guarded by Americans until the Iraqis are ready to take physical custody of him. That is expected to take a long time, and a trial isn't likely until 2005.

The defendants were informed individually of their rights, an international official said. An Iraqi judge witnessed the proceedings.

"The first step has happened," Salem Chalabi (search), the director of the Iraqi Special Tribunal (search) that will try Saddam, told The Associated Press. He refused to elaborate. "I met with him [Saddam] earlier today to explain his rights and what will happen," Chalabi said.

The crimes against humanity for which Saddam is expected to be tried include the 1988 chemical weapons massacre of Kurds in Halabja (search), the slaughter of Shiites during a 1991 uprising in southern Iraq, the 1990 invasion of Kuwait and the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war.

The legal transfer means that Saddam and the others are no longer prisoners of war � subject to rights under the Geneva Conventions � but criminal defendants whose treatment will be in accordance with Iraqi law.

L. Paul Bremer, the former U.S. administrator in Iraq, said it would be months before Saddam and the others would go to trial before an Iraqi tribunal, but he's confident the Iraqis will handle it well.

"He will get the kind of justice he denied his own people," Bremer said in a television interview Wednesday. "It's a wonderful day for the Iraqis to get him under their direct control. It will be a major event."

'The Whole World Will See This'

Pretrial negotiations are already under way over permitting Saddam's foreign legal team to work in Iraq, whether to televise the proceedings and whether to reinstate the death penalty, which was suspended by Bremer.

Mouwafak al-Rubaie, Iraq's new national security adviser, said Wednesday that the Iraqi Special Tribunal will be able to impose the death penalty. He said Saddam will not be allowed to turn the trial into a political game by calling witnesses such as President Bush or British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

"Saddam Hussein will be under the legal control of Iraqi law," he told British Broadcasting Corp. radio. "He is going to be tried according to the Iraqi criminal code."

Iraqi officials insist Saddam and the others will get fair trials. Hamid al-Bayati, Iraq's new deputy foreign minister and a leader of the main Shiite Muslim party, said there's "no chance at all" that Saddam will walk out a free man, perhaps on a legal technicality.

"The whole world will see this," said al-Bayati, who said he was tortured in Saddam's prisons in the 1970s. "He won't be able to walk free."

But the trial could contribute to the upheaval in Iraq by polarizing Saddam's supporters and detractors, said Walid Mohammed al-Shibibi, a Baghdad attorney and editor of a legal journal.

"This will escalate into terrorist attacks," he said.

Then there's always the chance that if Saddam has a chance to speak, he could use the opportunity to grandstand.

"I think that's always a risk, but that's also part of the process," Wesley Clark, the former NATO supreme allied commander who testified against accused war criminal and former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosovic, told Fox News.

Rich Galen, former media director for the Coalition Provisional Authority, told Fox News Wednesday that many experts have been working to identify and forensically study mass grave sites to use them as evidence.

"Remember, we're not talking about a few people or few thousands � we're talking about tens of thousands of people," Galen said. "We've had a large group of people, both Arabs and Westerners, going through warehouses of audio, video, still photographs. Saddam and his henchmen were brutally accurate in recording the horrors that they visited upon their people, so we've got a lot of stuff."

Upon their arraignment, the dozen U.S. military detainees will be given the status of Iraqi criminal suspects, which gives them the right to attorneys or appointed counsel, Chalabi said.

The Need for an 'Iron-Clad' Case

The first batch of Saddam's lieutenants to face the tribunal include Ali Hassan al-Majid, also known as "Chemical Ali"; former Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan; former deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz and two of Saddam's half brothers.

Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University law school, told Fox News that there are a large number of U.S. legal experts working "behind the scenes" and that "there's a couple of questions as to whether he will be tried last or first."

For example, he said, the government may want to try Saddam last in order to get more info from other witnesses "so that you have an iron-clad case against Saddam."

"There can't be an acquittal � it's so important to have the strongest possible case for the prosecution," added international lawyer James Hirsen.

A team of 20 foreign lawyers appointed by Saddam's wife Sajidah might not be permitted to represent him, al-Shibibi said.

The only foreign lawyers permitted to defend Iraqis without special permission are Palestinians and Syrians. Others must seek approval from the Iraqi Bar Association.

Ziad al-Khasawneh, one of Saddam's would-be defense attorneys, said in Amman, Jordan, that the defense team planned to go to Iraq but that Allawi's government had not said whether it would provide security.

"How can the defense team go to a country where it doesn't enjoy any protection? They will kill us there," said an angry al-Khasawneh.

Al-Shibibi said there are Iraqi lawyers who would agree to represent the dictator. Few would consent to release their identities � nor, for that matter, would prosecutors, he said. Lawyers working in Iraq's justice system have already received death threats.

The proceedings will rely on a mix of Iraqi criminal law, international regulations such as the Geneva Conventions and experiences of bodies such as the Rwanda war crimes tribunal.

As much as 30 tons of documents and other evidence must be culled. And then there are the potential witnesses, a body which could be said to include almost every Iraqi.

"If I'm asked to testify I would be willing," al-Bayati said. "But there are so many others who suffered more. There are more serious eyewitnesses."

Fox News' Liza Porteus and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

SEARCH




Advertise on FOX News Channel, FOXNews.com and FOX News Radio
Jobs at FOX News Channel.
Internships at FOX News Channel (Applications are now being accepted for Fall internships).
Terms of use. Privacy Statement. For FOXNews.com comments write to
[email protected]; For FOX News Channel comments write to
[email protected]
� Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright � 2004 ComStock, Inc.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2004 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
All market data delayed 20 minutes.



View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptianCircuitGod
Captain


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 788
Location: The Delta Quadrant

PostThu Jul 01, 2004 7:56 am    

Hell no. Damn media pisses me off because if it werent for them a lot less men and women would have died including civilians.




Pardon the Profanity.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostMon Jul 05, 2004 10:54 am    

I agree. Saddam's trial should not be televised. No trial should be televised, IMO.

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Melodramatic
Rear Admiral


Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Posts: 4577

PostWed Jul 07, 2004 5:59 pm    

No, not at all! He desirves to rot in hell for what he's done.

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Captain Dappet
Forum Revolutionist


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 16756
Location: On my supersonic rocket ship.

PostWed Jul 07, 2004 7:21 pm    

And he will, but that doesn't have anything to do with televising his trial. This is a TRIAL, ladies and gentlemen, not some bloody soap opera.


-------signature-------

"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste"

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostThu Jul 08, 2004 5:28 am    

They televised Milosevic's (sp?) trial, and that was in an international court.

Yes, they should televise the trial. No, if he gets executed, they shouldn't televise that.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Jeremy
J's Guy


Joined: 03 Oct 2002
Posts: 7823
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

PostThu Jul 08, 2004 6:29 am    

It might be a good idea to televise it, but not show it publically straight away or live. That would be pretty bad if they did that.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com