Author |
Message |
Jeff Miller Fleet Admiral
Joined: 22 Nov 2001 Posts: 23947 Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632
|
Wed Jun 16, 2004 1:17 pm |
|
If you say so just because I think different than I'm a bad person....
|
|
|
Theresa Lux Mihi Deus
Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 27256 Location: United States of America
|
Wed Jun 16, 2004 1:20 pm |
|
Apparently you cannot read. No one said that. If you have an inferiority complex, deal with it. Until you can make an informed opinion, shut up. You started the convo about stem cell research w/out even knowing what it was. And your, "if the babies already dead what does it matter" post proved that.
-------signature-------
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars
|
|
|
charlie American Soldier
Joined: 26 Feb 2004 Posts: 598 Location: In The United States
|
Wed Jun 16, 2004 6:48 pm stem cells |
|
since the only way to get stem cells is from an aborted fetus(baby) then let us address the two most used procedures. the first is in early term.
ussally they take a machine with a tube attatched that is in all actuality a big vacume. they insert the tube into the womb and suck the baby out. but not in one piece. the vaccume pulls the baby apart and is removed in pieces. that would be like the doctor deceiding that your stem cells would work, kick your door down, and with a big machine suck off your arms, legs torso and head. no money. the other is a banned proceedure used in late term. in this one they deliver the baby feet first till only the head is still inside the mother. since the entire baby was not delivered it was not born yet. reason they left the head is because if the haed had been out the procedure would be classified leagaly as murder. while the head was inside they shove surgical scissors through the back of the babys head and cut the spinal colum.
|
|
|
Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
|
Wed Jun 16, 2004 8:34 pm |
|
Okay, we are already loosing to the secularists, and we can't.
We HAVE to keep up morals, or if we dispose of one moral, then others will say that we can give up another, and another, and another.
Eventually, our society would be without morals, and that's just wrong.
Killing a person to save another is wrong.
Abortions is wrong.
No one should kill a baby, even for saving another life.
It's NOT right to sacrifice the life of a baby for another. (They can't even DECIDE FOR HIMSELF)
Stem Cell research should be stopped. It's all wrong.
Last edited by Republican_Man on Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
-------signature-------
"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:43 am |
|
I agree with you RM and Charlie
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|