Friendly Star Trek Discussions Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:11 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
PROOF! That canadians are all the same age
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Chit Chat This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostWed Jun 16, 2004 3:19 am    PROOF! That canadians are all the same age

This ones for you Dan:

All People in Canada are the Same Age
This "proof" will attempt to show that all people in Canada are the same age, by showing by induction that the following
statement (which we'll call "S(n)" for short) is true for all natural numbers n:

Statement S(n): In any group of n people, everyone in that group has the same age.

The conclusion follows from that statement by letting n be the the number of people in Canada.

If you're a little shaky on the principle of induction (which this proof uses), there's a brief summary of it below.

The Fallacious Proof of Statement S(n):

* Step 1: In any group that consists of just one person, everybody in the group has the same age, because after all
there
is only one person!

* Step 2: Therefore, statement S(1) is true.

* Step 3: The next stage in the induction argument is to prove that, whenever S(n) is true for one number (say n=k),
it is also true for the next number (that is, n = k+1).

* Step 4: We can do this by (1) assuming that, in every group of k people, everyone has the same age; then (2)
deducing from it that, in every group of k+1 people, everyone has the same age.

* Step 5: Let G be an arbitrary group of k+1 people; we just need to show that every member of G has the same age.

* Step 6: To do this, we just need to show that, if P and Q are any members of G, then they have the same age.

* Step 7: Consider everybody in G except P. These people form a group of k people, so they must all have the same age
(since we are assuming that, in any group of k people, everyone has the same age).

* Step 8: Consider everybody in G except Q. Again, they form a group of k people, so they must all have the same age.

* Step 9: Let R be someone else in G other than P or Q.

* Step 10: Since Q and R each belong to the group considered in step 7, they are the same age.

* Step 11: Since P and R each belong to the group considered in step 8, they are the same age.

* Step 12: Since Q and R are the same age, and P and R are the same age, it follows that P and Q are the same age.

* Step 13: We have now seen that, if we consider any two people P and Q in G, they have the same age. It follows that
everyone in G has the same age.

* Step 14: The proof is now complete: we have shown that the statement is true for n=1, and we have shown that whenever
it is true for n=k it is also true for n=k+1, so by induction it is true for all n.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Starbuck
faster...


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 8715
Location: between chaos and melody

PostWed Jun 16, 2004 9:56 am    

/\ That is a nice theory

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Oliver
Thought Maker


Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 6096
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostWed Jun 16, 2004 10:24 am    

It is a nice theory, but alas, it is flawed.

You just know this can not be correct so you just have to look for the mastake, that one step that makes everything fall apart. I believe I have found it. Let me try to explain...

I understand your induction theory as it is used often in mathematics. We know for sure that S(1) is correct. Let's assume S(k) is correct also. All we need to do now is prove that S(k+1) is correct. Only then can we say that your statement is true. This can only be achieved when you ADD a new member to the group and prove that your statement is still correct.

What you do is add a new member and take out someone else. Then you say that the new group has k members and therefor it is correct. You need to add a new member and then prove it on that new group. No taking someone else out.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostWed Jun 16, 2004 3:25 pm    

Leave it to Oli to ruin my anti-canadian fun...

Nice though. I knew there was an error, but of course, I didnt WANT to find it.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Melodramatic
Rear Admiral


Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Posts: 4577

PostWed Jun 16, 2004 4:03 pm    Re: PROOF! That canadians are all the same age

how impressive!
Smartie pants..


View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
GhostOfAMemory
Star-crossed Voyager


Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 4322
Location: My computer... duh

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 12:12 am    

*goes cross-eyed*

Alrighty then...

*falls over*



-------signature-------

- The road goes ever on and on, down from door where it began; Now far ahead the road has gone, and I must follow, if I can -

Jesus loves you! God bless

Go to www.purevolume.com/leahcoiro NOW or face anhilation! BWAHA!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 1:49 am    

I talked to the friend I got this from. Apparently Oli is completely wrong. This brings me great joy, except that I dont really know.

Apparently the problem is in Step 9.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Oliver
Thought Maker


Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 6096
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 1:51 am    

Defiant wrote:
I talked to the friend I got this from. Apparently Oli is completely wrong. This brings me great joy, except that I dont really know.

Apparently the problem is in Step 9.


Well then, prove that I am wrong...


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Defiant
Fleet Admiral


Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR

PostThu Jun 17, 2004 2:05 am    

My weak spot is hit. Your anti-proof seems good enough. Personally I hate proofs. I really do. But my friend insists that you are wrong. Oh well, perhaps I can get his ass here, and he can tell you.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com