was Picard better on TNG or X-Men |
Star Trek: TNG |
|
77% |
[ 34 ] |
X-men |
|
22% |
[ 10 ] |
|
Total Votes : 44 |
|
Author |
Message |
Maga Morgan Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 120 Location: Anywhere but here
|
Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:00 pm |
|
i voted for startrek:TNG cuz he`s a very good cap and you see more of him than X-MEN
-------signature-------
tLhIngan maH! (We Are Klingons!)
|
|
|
jbi507 Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 12 Sep 2003 Posts: 254 Location: DS9
|
Fri Sep 26, 2003 7:30 pm |
|
his a good actor, he knows how to act, and plus his good at playing the leader type role.
|
|
|
CaptJD Disyple
Joined: 16 Sep 2003 Posts: 2699 Location: Canada!
|
Sat Sep 27, 2003 11:10 pm |
|
I think he played better as picard, thats probably because I've seen him more often in that role but he also layed well in X-men so it was still a hard choice to make.
|
|
|
GhostOfAMemory Star-crossed Voyager
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 4322 Location: My computer... duh
|
Thu Oct 02, 2003 9:48 pm |
|
I say star trek...
A. because picard is the main star of TNG, but not so much in x-men
B. picard is just cooler than proffeser X... I just think it's slightly weird seeing the face I know as a really great star trek captain being a mutant in a wheelchair... lmbo. Altho it's even weirder seeing him play a bad guy in conspiracy theory... but hey.
So... yeah. patrick stuart as picard!
-------signature-------
- The road goes ever on and on, down from door where it began; Now far ahead the road has gone, and I must follow, if I can -
Jesus loves you! God bless
Go to www.purevolume.com/leahcoiro NOW or face anhilation! BWAHA!
|
|
|
davecenter Commander
Joined: 22 Oct 2003 Posts: 391 Location: The Bridge
|
Fri Oct 24, 2003 12:06 pm |
|
I think he better on TNG. He was portrayed a little better.
-------signature-------
Some think they are great, some want to be great, but very few are truly great
|
|
|
miss7 Commodore
Joined: 10 Dec 2003 Posts: 1340
|
Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:15 am |
|
He Was better in TNG!!!!
|
|
|
John Connor Admiral of the Terran Empire
Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 15657 Location: I.S.S Emperor
|
Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:45 am |
|
I would think he did better in star trek. No offence to people that like him in x-men.
|
|
|
Paul Marshall Rear Admiral
Joined: 30 Aug 2002 Posts: 2976 Location: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
|
Sat Jan 10, 2004 1:51 pm |
|
i voted for TNG
|
|
|
DemonClassY Commodore
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 1986 Location: Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A
|
Thu Jan 29, 2004 7:49 pm |
|
I voted for TNG because I guess you get more attached and involved witht he character because you have seen him for seven years. and plus he does a better job on TNG.
-------signature-------
First city to bring home the Lombardi Trophy and Lord Stanley in the same season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO PENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
lord_picard Captain
Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 713
|
Thu Jan 29, 2004 9:31 pm |
|
definatly tng because he simpily had enough time to get into the character of Jean-Luc Picard. or maby its because to us he has been type cast
|
|
|
Mr.Shuyin Ensign, Junior Grade
Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Posts: 35
|
Sat Feb 14, 2004 12:44 am |
|
I THINK HE WAS SOOOOOOO MUCH BETTER IN X-MEN
|
|
|
imzadi76 Commander
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 367 Location: Pittsburgh - PA - USA - Earth - Sector001 - Alpha Quadrant
|
Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:02 pm |
|
We are not worthy to bask in the glory that is Patrick Stewart. The man's amazing.
I voted TNG - I feel his work on First Contact alone was better than his performance in the X-Men movies.
-------signature-------
Live long and prosper
|
|
|
ltjgcookie Senior Cadet
Joined: 05 Mar 2004 Posts: 26 Location: rotc room
|
Fri Mar 05, 2004 11:34 pm tng |
|
My opinion is that Stewart was much better on tng only because it was a t.v. show and he has more appearances.
|
|
|
Monkey Captain
Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 833 Location: On a quest you probably wouldn't believe.
|
Fri Mar 26, 2004 9:54 pm |
|
TNG theres now way that you can even compair it with x-men
|
|
|
~Voyager Fanatic~ Super Genius
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 1787
|
Fri May 07, 2004 6:03 am |
|
TNG all the way!!!
|
|
|
Robsladey Commodore
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 Posts: 1215 Location: Sickbay
|
Fri May 07, 2004 12:58 pm |
|
All those years on Star Trek and only two X-Men films... of course we are going to prefer ST
|
|
|
robbiewebster Rear Admiral
Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 2594 Location: Rochester, New York
|
Fri May 07, 2004 1:21 pm |
|
i definently liked his character on x-men better than the one on tng
-------signature-------
|
|
|
Paul Marshall Rear Admiral
Joined: 30 Aug 2002 Posts: 2976 Location: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
|
Fri May 07, 2004 1:27 pm |
|
He basically presented himself the same in both (acting-wise ).
|
|
|
voyager123456789 Lieutenant
Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 175 Location: Alpha Quardrant
|
Wed May 26, 2004 6:08 am |
|
Hey your a startrek fan.
how can you talk about X-men
-------signature-------
--Space, the place where all your imaginations can come true--
|
|
|
Janeway7 Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: 248 Location: Manchester England
|
Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:29 pm |
|
I think he's a good actor and would be good in any role, but not comady.
|
|
|
gul Lemek III. Commodore
Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 1513 Location: Slovenia
|
Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:20 pm |
|
I've had more experience with TNG so I voted for it.
|
|
|
superwoman Vice Admiral
Joined: 25 May 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Sweden
|
Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:54 pm |
|
Ooo, tricky question. I'd say star trek tng, becouse i like star trek more then x-men. But i think Stewart is good anytime.
|
|
|
HarryKim707 Senior Cadet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Operations
|
Tue Jun 15, 2004 3:09 pm |
|
He Was DEFINETLY Better in X-me
|
|
|
tdm Sophomore Cadet
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 13
|
Wed Jul 07, 2004 2:02 pm |
|
i think he was better in startrek tng
|
|
|
|