| Author |
Message |
Jeff Miller
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 23947
Location: Mental Ward for the Mentaly Unstable 6th floor, Saint John's 1615 Delaware Longview Washington 98632
|
 Tue Mar 23, 2004 2:32 pm NASA: Mars' Surface Had Pool of Water |
|
| Quote: | PASADENA, Calif. (AP) -- Mars once had a briny pool of standing water on its surface that could have supported life in the now-frozen planet's distant past, NASA scientists said Tuesday.
Scientists announced earlier this month that the Opportunity rover found evidence of water long ago on Mars, but it was unclear whether the water was underground or on the surface. The new findings suggest there was a pool of saltwater at least two inches deep.
A rocky outcropping examined by the rover had ripple patterns and concentrations of salt - considered telltale signs that the rock formed in standing water.
The findings add to the growing body of evidence that the Red Planet was once was a warmer and wetter place that may have been conducive to life.
"We think Opportunity is now parked on what was once the shoreline of a salty sea on Mars," said Cornell University astronomer Steve Squyres, the mission's main scientist.
Although Squyres referred to the water as a sea, scientists said it was not clear how big the body of water might have been or whether it was a permanent fixture. Instead, the site could have been a desert basin or salt flat that periodically flooded with water.
The evidence also does not indicate when water covered the broad and flat region where Opportunity landed, called Meridiani Planum, or for how long. Nor does it indicate if any organisms actually lived on Mars.
If life did flourish at the site when it was awash in water, the type of rock found there could contain evidence of biological material, Squyres said.
The findings were to be presented Tuesday at a televised news conference at the headquarters of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in Washington.
NASA has tentative plans to send a robotic mission to Mars in 2013 that would collect samples of rock and soil and return them to Earth for more detailed analysis.
"This result gives us impetus to expand our ambitious program of exploring Mars to learn whether microbes have ever lived there and, ultimately, whether we can," said Ed Weiler, NASA's associate administrator for space science.
NASA intends to send one or more unmanned missions to Mars every 26 months. President Bush recently proposed a crewed mission to visit the planet but did not set a timeline for such an undertaking, which probably remains decades away.
For decades, spacecraft in orbit around Mars have shown evidence that large amounts of liquid water once flowed across the surface, carving vast and sinuous networks of channels. The new results provide the first definitive evidence from rocks examined on the surface of Mars that liquid water once pooled on the surface.
Opportunity carried out detailed analyses of the finely layered rocks in an outcrop at its landing site, snapping 152 microscopic images of one feature alone.
The repeated, close-up looks revealed that the sediments that bonded together to form the rocks were shaped into ripples by water that stood at least two inches deep, said mission science team member John Grotzinger of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The water flowed over the site at an estimated four to 20 inches per second, Grotzinger said.
The analyses also bolstered previously disclosed evidence that suggested the rocks contained a salt called bromine, which would have precipitated out of the water as it evaporated.
Today, Mars is largely dry and cold. It contains trace amounts of water vapor in its atmosphere and large caps of frozen water at its poles. Spacecraft also have detected significant amounts of ice mixed in the martian soil at high latitudes.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory launched Opportunity and its twin, Spirit, on a $820 million mission to probe Mars for evidence of water in its past.
|
My question is if it could have had water on it what happened to change all that?
|
|
|
Arellia
The Quiet One
Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Fri Mar 26, 2004 5:29 pm Re: NASA: Mars' Surface Had Pool of Water |
|
| Jeff Miller wrote: |
My question is if it could have had water on it what happened to change all that? |
Well, according to more popular belief amongst scientists, the origin of life came from a *tidepool.* The theory--in simple terms, since I'd rather not get out my notes, is this... In a lab, if you take water with mineral and evaporate it, then charge it with electricity and saturate it with a few elements, and turn it back into water, and you do this enough times, you will end up with a 'Coacervate'--a small gooey thing that is not living but does have a fat-protein-fat structue, much like a cell. This is believed to be possible to produce in nature through storms and such. Supposedly, after this stage, it's possible under some conditions for the cell to become a pre-cell and then finally a cell. You can't get this result in the lab, however, so its only a theory. If it were to get this far, it would eventually become a simple algae or bacteria. The likelyhood of this producing a conventional animal organism is very thin, however, and if the tidepool was all Mars has it would probably only be able to produce plant life. To produce animal organisms, supposedly you'd need hydrothermal vents...which is another story entirely. 
So, anyway...that's the theory. If Mars did happen to have algaes, I know a number of people who would be incredibly thrilled. I don't particularily like this theory or think it's acurate, but scientists happen to think it's true, so a pool of salty water on Mars would make them pleased.
|
|
|
Monkey
Captain
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 833
Location: On a quest you probably wouldn't believe.
|
| Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:41 am |
|
what does it matter? there are algees on the bottom of my foot too.
-------signature-------
"Maybe I should get myself fired."
Millennium Actress
|
|
|
eclipse8472
Captain
Joined: 02 Apr 2002
Posts: 863
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
| Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:43 am |
|
eventually earth will run out of resources to support us then what?, thats what I worry about, although im sure its millions of years in the future it is still concerning
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
