Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:21 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Too advanced?
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek: Enterprise This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostWed Jan 15, 2003 6:01 pm    

that order suck apart from TAS at the bottom


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Lindley
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 6194
Location: Fairfax, VA

PostWed Jan 15, 2003 6:10 pm    

voyagerlr wrote:
that order suck apart from TAS at the bottom


Sure it does. Look, could you try to use complete sentences please?



-------signature-------

"Every minute you keep River Tam from me, more people will die."
"You think I care?"
"Of course you care!"

www.serenitymovie.com

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostWed Jan 15, 2003 6:50 pm    

sorry i will try better next time


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostThu Jan 16, 2003 10:52 am    

that a rubbish order apart from TAS at the bottom.


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Kathryn__Janeway
Ensign


Joined: 21 Sep 2002
Posts: 54
Location: USS VOyager. Then again that's easy to see

PostFri Jan 17, 2003 11:14 pm    

Well ur right the Enterprise NX-01 does look a lot more advanced than Kirk's but we've had advances in technology it's hard to go back to before Kirk when there has been 30-40 years time for OUR technology to advance


-------signature-------

"Dimissed" -- Janeway
[stands there dumbfounded] "B...but.." -- Neelix
"That's Starfleet for get out" -- Janeway (The Cloud)

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostSat Jan 18, 2003 1:48 pm    

i concur


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Achilles
Commodore


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1718
Location: Flibdor

PostMon Jan 20, 2003 8:24 pm    

Lindley wrote:
voyagerlr wrote:
its ok here the order for me though:

VOY
TNG
ENT
DS9
OS
AS


Hmm. I'd put them like

DS9 :8
VOY
TNG
TOS
ENT (I want to like it. I just can't.)
TAS (Never seen it)


My list would be like this.

DS9:
VOY:
ENT:
TNG:
TOS: *there is no smilie for a bland expression!*
AS:


Going back to the topic, I think that the technology level of the Enterprise itself is about alright, but in terms of species encountered and technology encountered I do agree, it's too much.



-------signature-------

Sith Flibble

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Chinesetrekkie
Council Leader


Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Posts: 9719
Location: Windsor, California [Shenyang, China]

PostTue Jan 21, 2003 11:17 pm    

TOS is the original Startrek with Captain James T. Kirk, the one which lauched it all.

DS9
VOY
ENT
TNG
TOS



-------signature-------

You may call me Shen [The Chinesetrekkie]

910th User to Register for STV.com

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostSat Feb 08, 2003 4:46 pm    

good order!


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Los
Commodore


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 1336
Location: Oklahoma fa sho!

PostSat Feb 08, 2003 9:26 pm    

I don't get it.


-------signature-------

Dilithium Crystals prove the existence of protoculture.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostSun Feb 09, 2003 9:03 am    

what dont you get do you think enterprise is too advanced i mean its supposed to have been before kirk but it look like its after picard or something!


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
1/1
Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Apr 2002
Posts: 3311
Location: La La Land

PostSun Feb 09, 2003 3:25 pm    

Isn't their warp thingy a bit advanced coz warp was invented in 2063 and isn't enterprise set in 2063?


-------signature-------


New Earth, New Hopes . . . and then theres Harry Kim!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
voyagerlr
Commodore


Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 2448
Location: USS Shockwave

PostSun Feb 09, 2003 3:48 pm    

maybe they should have gone for a warp 3 engine instead but that wouldnt make as good a series i suppose.


-------signature-------

Bartlet 4 America

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
lord_picard
Captain


Joined: 27 Feb 2003
Posts: 713

PostTue Mar 04, 2003 12:07 pm    

what are you talking about!!!!!!!!!!! its not nearly edvanced enough!!!!!!!!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com