Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:45 pm  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Stupid Question
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Star Trek Tech This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
PrankishSmart
Rear Admiral


Joined: 29 Apr 2002
Posts: 4779
Location: Hobart, Australia.

PostWed Jun 05, 2002 9:37 am    

6 OF 9 wrote:
Maquis74656 wrote:
Quote:

On 2002-03-22 14:44, Seven of Nine wrote:
Dunno... probably in the future



Brat
It just doesn't make sense. We know now that you don't need constant thrust to maintain a speed in space, so it's only logical that they'd know it in the future.


I AGREE


My theory:
When a comet, asteroid or simular chunk floats thru space at high speeds, it leaves a trail behind. in space there are particles which eventually slow a fast moving object down (hence the use of a deflector at warp speed!). just maybe because of a high speed (lets say 50% the speed of light) the object will float into these particles and slow down slowly. the reason this has not been seen by rockets etc is they dont travel fast enough.


View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Kowenai Ganei
Sophomore Cadet


Joined: 04 Jun 2002
Posts: 10
Location: On his ship, the Red Rose

PostWed Jun 05, 2002 11:02 am    

This is some of the most logical line of questioning presented in this section of the forums in a long line. ::almost breaks into tears:: I'm so


-------signature-------

Don't bother watching your back, it's already full of blaster bolt holes

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
parkan
Captain


Joined: 02 Apr 2002
Posts: 833
Location: I now reside in the trekbbs.com forums. See you there.

PostWed Jun 05, 2002 2:13 pm    

PrankishSmart wrote:
6 OF 9 wrote:
Maquis74656 wrote:
Quote:

On 2002-03-22 14:44, Seven of Nine wrote:
Dunno... probably in the future



Brat
It just doesn't make sense. We know now that you don't need constant thrust to maintain a speed in space, so it's only logical that they'd know it in the future.


I AGREE



IMHO the constant temporal stress is the problem, as well as the particles.
My theory:
When a comet, asteroid or simular chunk floats thru space at high speeds, it leaves a trail behind. in space there are particles which eventually slow a fast moving object down (hence the use of a deflector at warp speed!). just maybe because of a high speed (lets say 50% the speed of light) the object will float into these particles and slow down slowly. the reason this has not been seen by rockets etc is they dont travel fast enough.



-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Computer
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 15 Jun 2002
Posts: 229
Location: My Computer (in England)

PostWed Jun 19, 2002 12:48 pm    

THis thread is really confusing me??

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
MT39503
Commodore


Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 1437
Location: AZ

PostWed Jun 19, 2002 3:53 pm    

Kowenai Ganei wrote:
This is some of the most logical line of questioning presented in this section of the forums in a long line. ::almost breaks into tears:: I'm so


You must be easily impressed...LOL


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
parkan
Captain


Joined: 02 Apr 2002
Posts: 833
Location: I now reside in the trekbbs.com forums. See you there.

PostWed Jun 19, 2002 11:16 pm    

Actually, it is. It seems that you've got something against me?


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
MT39503
Commodore


Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 1437
Location: AZ

PostWed Jun 19, 2002 11:38 pm    

parkan wrote:
Actually, it is. It seems that you've got something against me?
Me NO!!! Your probably the only one tghat can rival me in this forum. I wasn't reffering to that anyway..

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Borg Dude
Ensign, Junior Grade


Joined: 18 Aug 2002
Posts: 34

PostTue Sep 03, 2002 8:38 pm    

Maquis74656 wrote:
Quote:

On 2002-03-22 14:44, Seven of Nine wrote:
Dunno... probably in the future



Brat
It just doesn't make sense. We know now that you don't need constant thrust to maintain a speed in space, so it's only logical that they'd know it in the future.

\
space is not a total vacume, theres still a little tiny amount of matter in space and so mabye we don't notice it when were just going to the moon or something, but mabye when travling many light years u do start to slow down a little.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Commander Ranahan
Doctor


Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 9519
Location: Guam

PostWed Sep 04, 2002 7:57 am    

Maquis74656 wrote:
Ok, here's another stupid question. They are always talking about the ships structural integrity. Again, what would that matter? I know they'd have to have sheilds/screens to deflect debris in space, but there is no friction, no gravity pulling at the ship, so what's the problem? Like when Sulu's helmsman on the Excelsior says that they are going to fly the ship apart, ????
It doesn't make any difference if you went in space and threw a baseball, or shot a bullet, they would just keep on going, and the only thing that would cause their shape to change, or any stress on/in either object would be an outside force, not the object itself being propelled through space, because again, there is no gravity, no friction, nothing to slow it down. I took into consideration that the ship has atmosphere, and artificial gravity, but didn't see how that would affect anything, seeing as how the ship is a solid object on the outside. Maybe I am complicating things, but I am just trying to understand.

Oh, yeah, back to my first question, on the TOS ep I was watching, (the one where they court martial Spock), the Commodore says now they just drift, they still had shields and all, so they were safe, but shouldn't they just have kept drifting at the speed they were at indefinitely? (until acted upon by another outside force, i.e., a planet, meteor, etc.....?



Also the design of the ship, Like interpid was built from Max Warp speeds such as 9.75, but A Constiution wassnt built for speed, oh and The U.S>S. Exsesor(Sorry cant spell name)The reason they made that desiign was for Transwrap Flight, So the design Wassnt Notiable for regualr warp speed.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Bugger Boy
Commodore


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 1402
Location: U.S.S Soveriegn

PostThu Sep 05, 2002 3:03 pm    

You are all scaring me with the talking. He a radio i know how you kids like to boogie with the hippin' and the hoppin' and the bippin' and the boppin'...


yeah...


dude...


bye...



-------signature-------

FREKAZEE.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Computer
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 15 Jun 2002
Posts: 229
Location: My Computer (in England)

PostSat Sep 07, 2002 8:04 am    

artistic licencse

View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Borg771
Commodore


Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 1706

PostTue Sep 10, 2002 7:41 pm    

ran out of gas???? I know thats possible but doesnt it take a while? It depends on how long you are in the shuttle craft flying.


-------signature-------



View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
The Hunter
Commodore


Joined: 31 Jul 2002
Posts: 1010
Location: Second Officer-Deep Space 10

PostThu Sep 19, 2002 7:01 pm    

i really dont know sry


-------signature-------

"Ironic isn't it, our most elusive prey is our own creation." Hirogen Hunter-Flesh And Blood

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com