Author |
Message |
CHRIS@STTI Senior Cadet
Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 25 Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
|
Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:42 pm Roxann Dawson's Birthdate???? |
|
There seems to be a problem with the year Mrs. Dawson was born in. 1958 or 1964?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roxann_Dawson
Does anyone know what her real birthdate is, I am alittle confused as to why it was 1964 for years, then it was suddenly changed to 1958???
|
|
|
monroe Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 120
|
Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:03 pm |
|
1958, most likely, i would think.
|
|
|
Sevenofninenz Commodore
Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 2441 Location: New Zealand Penal Colony
|
Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:50 pm |
|
Well, does she look 47 or 41? To me she doesn't look all that old, so maybe she's only 41...
-------signature-------
"The men cheered. The women fainted. The children waved multi-coloured flags!" - AT
My LJ
|
|
|
monroe Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 120
|
Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:17 pm |
|
47 isn't old.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:15 pm |
|
Keep in mind it's been more than 10 years since Voyager aired, she could have easily been in her 30s when it started. Time has a way of sneaking up on people
|
|
|
CHRIS@STTI Senior Cadet
Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 25 Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
|
Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:46 am |
|
If...she was born in 1958, that would have made her 37 when Voyager started and 44 when it finished and going by her looks, thats hard to believe.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:28 pm |
|
Looks can be decieving. Hallie Berry is turning 40 this year, and she certainly doesn't look it.
|
|
|
Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
|
Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:30 pm |
|
Don't matter how old Roxann is, she is still beautiful.
|
|
|
TrekkieMage Office Junkie
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
|
Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:37 pm |
|
Leo Wyatt wrote: | Don't matter how old Roxann is, she is still beautiful. |
Yeah. She is a very graceful and talented woman. I really couldn't care less if she was born 64 or 58
|
|
|
Sevenofninenz Commodore
Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 2441 Location: New Zealand Penal Colony
|
Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:39 pm |
|
monroe I didn't mean to imply that 47 was old, sorry.
-------signature-------
"The men cheered. The women fainted. The children waved multi-coloured flags!" - AT
My LJ
|
|
|
Emili Lieutenant
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 164 Location: England
|
Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:23 pm |
|
Leo Wyatt wrote: | Don't matter how old Roxann is, she is still beautiful. |
yea, lucky woman
|
|
|
MakeItSo Commander
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 406 Location: Somewhere in California
|
Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:35 pm |
|
Yeah, I was very surprised to see that she was only 3 years younger than Kate Mulgrew. I think she just has that naturally young look to her which is good. She looks very good for her age now, as does Kate. I think the only ones that aren't in late 40's or early 50's are Jeri Ryan, Garret Wang and Jennifer Lien.
|
|
|
Sara_Chakotay Ensign
Joined: 01 Jan 2009 Posts: 59 Location: Toronto Canada
|
Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:14 pm |
|
can't someone just find her myspace page or something like that and ask her or use other dates to find out her birthday?Caretaker aired on January 16 1995(the year I was born )and ended sometime in 2001(the year my lil sis was born ) and B'elanna was 21 in Caretaker
|
|
|
Curtis Fleet Admiral
Joined: 29 Sep 2001 Posts: 14903 Location: Wisconsin
|
Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:45 pm |
|
CHRIS@STTI wrote: | I was wondering, since recent changes to IMDB show that Roxann Dawson was born in 1958 and not 1964, does that mean B'Elanna Torres was 37 when Voyager started. Or is it similar to Nana Vistor's Kira. Nana Visitor was born in 1957, making her 36 when DS9 started and her character, Kira was only 26 years old at that time.
So she was an older actress playing a younger character, maybe the same thing is going on with Roxann/Torres.
I found this on Memory Alpha, I think it makes sense to me. What do you guys think, when was Torres born??
http://www.memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/B%27Elanna_Torres |
Sara_Chakotay wrote: | B'elanna was 21 in Caretaker I know freaky that's the miricale of makeup |
|
|
|
Pan13 Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 338 Location: Belgium
|
Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:54 am |
|
It feels so very weird to me that most of the former Voyager actors are my parents age (born in '61 and '64). And it's really hard to imagine a cast of a television show aging. I mean, in Voyager they will always be, let's say in their 30s. I've seen some pictures of some of the actors now and it's just so...weird. You know, like Robert Beltran being gray by now.
|
|
|
mythulto Crewman
Joined: 08 Jan 2009 Posts: 3 Location: Fluidic Space
|
Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:47 am |
|
Pan13 wrote: | It feels so very weird to me that most of the former Voyager actors are my parents age (born in '61 and '64). And it's really hard to imagine a cast of a television show aging. I mean, in Voyager they will always be, let's say in their 30s. I've seen some pictures of some of the actors now and it's just so...weird. You know, like Robert Beltran being gray by now. |
I totally agree about the "weird"ness.
There's also a part of me that doesn't want to see the actors outside of the show. The characters they created are so real to me that the actors portraying them seem like bad impostors. I'm always torn at whether or not to watch "behind the scenes" shows, interviews and specials. It kind of bursts the bubble of wonder and awe I create in my own mind when I become attached to a show such as Voyager. I think it's better to stick to the fantasy of the show and avoid the "reality" stuff.
|
|
|
|