Friendly Star Trek Discussions Fri Nov 22, 2024 7:59 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Moderating Opinions
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> Suggestions, Feedback, & Help This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun May 27, 2007 3:46 pm    Moderating Opinions

Recently some concern was brought up about how moderators were handling certain issues and rules on this board.

Spam and off-topic discussions: is it fair for us to ask that off-topic discussion be taken to PMs or moved to a new thread? Should "spam" only be considered sales spam, or also massive amounts of pointless posts (eg: attempting to respond to every post in "This or That?")?

Editing posts: is it reasonable for Mods to be able to edit posts in which they feel there is an issue (other than tagging the post with [locked - TM] to notify who locked the post, etc.), or do you feel that this is unreasonable?

General Modding issues: Occasionally a Mod gets in an argument with a user, if they feel the user is getting out of hand, should they attempt to warn or reprimand the user, or should they ask another Mod to handle the situation? From the discussion between the Mods, it appears that WN is more vulnerable to this issue than other forums - this is particularly because WN is a more volatile forum than the others.

Another subject that came up while discussing this is the matter of PMs. The Mods have gotten the impression that when reprimanding a user, it's generally preferred that we PM them rather than publicly reprimand them because of embarrassment. But it's also brought up an issue of communication and impressions. Sometimes other members involved in an argument don't realize what's happened behind closed doors and continue the argument, or get the impression that the Mods have been excessively harsh with the user in question. So, do you feel that keeping reprimands to PMs is a resonable system? Or should be be more public when dealing with reprimanding a user (why we're doing so, what the punishment is, etc)?

What are your opinions on these issues?

Also, for anyone who feels like there is pressure to "say the right thing", you can post anonymously in this forum. And this discussion isn't to talk about specific actions of specific mods, but just how moderating is handled in general.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
squiggy
Stooge Two


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 3007
Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!

PostSun May 27, 2007 4:33 pm    Re: Moderating Opinions

TrekkieMage wrote:
Recently some concern was brought up about how moderators were handling certain issues and rules on this board.

Spam and off-topic discussions: is it fair for us to ask that off-topic discussion be taken to PMs or moved to a new thread? Should "spam" only be considered sales spam, or also massive amounts of pointless posts (eg: attempting to respond to every post in "This or That?")?

makes sense to me..... I have a dislike to spam... so I think it is fair.
... wrote:

Editing posts: is it reasonable for Mods to be able to edit posts in which they feel there is an issue (other than tagging the post with [locked - TM] to notify who locked the post, etc.), or do you feel that this is unreasonable?

If you are a mod or an admin, you do this because it removes possibly questionable content, and because it's kinda your job. Again, makes sense to me.
... wrote:

General Modding issues: Occasionally a Mod gets in an argument with a user, if they feel the user is getting out of hand, should they attempt to warn or reprimand the user, or should they ask another Mod to handle the situation? From the discussion between the Mods, it appears that WN is more vulnerable to this issue than other forums - this is particularly because WN is a more volatile forum than the others.

...This I am not sure about... personally, I like the concept of a DIFFERENT mod or admin dealing with mod/not-mod user issues, however, otherwise, I think that as a mod or admin, if there is no conflict of interest, there shouldn't be a problem with it.
... wrote:

Another subject that came up while discussing this is the matter of PMs. The Mods have gotten the impression that when reprimanding a user, it's generally preferred that we PM them rather than publicly reprimand them because of embarrassment. But it's also brought up an issue of communication and impressions. Sometimes other members involved in an argument don't realize what's happened behind closed doors and continue the argument, or get the impression that the Mods have been excessively harsh with the user in question. So, do you feel that keeping reprimands to PMs is a resonable system? Or should be be more public when dealing with reprimanding a user (why we're doing so, what the punishment is, etc)?

I admit to prefering the PM system because it allows the user to post what reasons they are implimenting in THIER argument, reasons, which, due to graphic... or personal reasons they may not wish to make public. Personally, I think that if someone wants to know something about it if it was regarding a specific post, the moderator should put something along the lines of...
Example wrote:

Post content deemed innapropriate - deleted.[example]
Questions? Pm (mod username)

This way people know which mod is dealing with it, and can ask them if there are questions about what is happening.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostSun May 27, 2007 10:47 pm    

Thanks for your comments

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Joey
Rear Admiral


Joined: 13 Jul 2001
Posts: 4708

PostThu May 31, 2007 5:38 am    

First I would like to point out that posting "anonymously" as you put it is completely useless, as you all can see our IP adressess weither we are logged in or not, so to truely post "anonymously" one would have to go to a new computer like at a public library or such.

second, the mods are too harsh, and quite frankly the power is going, or has gone to a lot of their heads


and third, it would be wrong to warn or repremand anyone who posts their opinions about the mods/admins here, (as long as its not really offense, like curseing and that) as the topic is all about our opinions

~Joey~

{Thanks Danni}


Last edited by Joey on Thu May 31, 2007 7:46 am; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Seven of Nine
Sammie's Mammy


Joined: 16 Jun 2001
Posts: 7871
Location: North East England

PostThu May 31, 2007 7:08 am    

If you're worried about the IP, post using this link:

http://bypass.jndhost.net/index.php?q=www.startrekvoyager.com&hl=0011100001

That goes through my proxy, so the ip that will be seen will be my server's.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com