Friendly Star Trek Discussions Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:27 am  
  SearchSearch   FAQFAQ   Log inLog in   
Vice president's lesbian daughter pregnant
View: previous topic :: next topic

stv-archives.com Forum Index -> World News This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.
Author Message
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:10 pm    

There are many, many people who don't grow up with both a female and male figure in their lives. Parents don't determine mental health.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:15 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
There are many, many people who don't grow up with both a female and male figure in their lives. Parents don't determine mental health.


And yet they play a critical role in it. Study after study shows that it is important to have a male and a female figure in one's life. (I don't know her name, but my source for this would be this one psychiatrist who was on the O'Reilly Factor this week. She talked about multiple studies showing this, and said that her opinion agreed with those studies.)



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:24 pm    

I did a quick google and didn't really get anything either way. But anyway, I'm guessing that by your logic single people shouldn't be allowed to adopt, either? And I don't see how being shuffled around from foster home to foster home or living in an orphanage (with no parents what-so-ever) could really be much worse than gay adoption.


-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:36 pm    

IntrepidIsMe wrote:
I did a quick google and didn't really get anything either way. But anyway, I'm guessing that by your logic single people shouldn't be allowed to adopt, either? And I don't see how being shuffled around from foster home to foster home or living in an orphanage (with no parents what-so-ever) could really be much worse than gay adoption.


I don't think it's necessary in the case of single parents because they are likely to have males around either way, such as through dating and so forth. Not to mention that the homosexual parental household has two individuals of the same sex, not just one.

Bit the latter's what changed my mind on gay adoption. I think a stable home with two parents of the same sex is better than going from foster home to foster home (orphanages per se, I believe, no longer exist in this country), but I think that, in the interest of balancing out for the child, it should be required that the parents show proof of someone of the opposite sex who can be there in the child's life. That is absolutely imperative, in my belief (and I suppose I would be fine with that for single households, though I don't think it's necessary in that instance). Children with two parents of the same sex need some sort of balance in their life. They can't just be surrounded by adults of the same sex. They need a stable balance.

Besides, requiring this is better than not allowing it, as people like Bush would want, no?



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
IntrepidIsMe
Pimp Handed


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 13057
Location: New York

PostSun Dec 10, 2006 9:48 pm    

So, you're basing your idea that single-parent adoption is okay on the assumption that they'll date? That's a pretty weak stance. Even if they do date, then how do you know it's with one person for more than a couple of weeks at a time?

There will always be adults of the opposite sex around, family friends, teachers, etc. The only way there couldn't be is if they lock the child up and don't let him/her out. And studies show that abuse is less likely with homosexual parents than heterosexual parents, so we all know that that's even less likely.

Anyway, according to the journal Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, homosexual parents aren't more or less likely than heterosexual parents to influence their children in one direction or another (be it sexually or behavior) That's the only scholarly journal I've been able to find so far.



-------signature-------

"Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

-Wuthering Heights

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 1:58 am    

Children are influenced by all kinds of people, aside from their parents, and I think "proving" they'll be around someone of the other sex is way out there. Coming from a single-parent home definitely doesn't mean you're going to see people of the other sex, and I'd say it can be even more damaging if your parent is dating someone, or several someones filtering in and out of your life. You can't legislate that all kids will have an adult figure of both sexes. That's way interfering in the lives of everyday people.

And do we forget, even children of homosexual parents will likely have grandparents, eh? I barely saw my grandfather growing up, but he was my only male "rolemodel"... and a very fine one.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 2:37 am    

I have absolutely no arguments against what you've said. I'm stumped, and I've got nothing to counter with. Therefore I think you've just won the debate, and I have no choice but to admit it

And you've won me over, too. I would hope that this would happen, and think that it should, but that requirement would be unnecessary. I am now in agreement.



-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
magenta
Commander


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 404
Location: AUSTRALIA

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 5:39 am    

I dont understand why a person would deliberately put a child in a situation of no father or no mother?If it be a woman deliberately getting pregnant with the intention of being a single mother.Or a lesbian couple wanting to adopt or one get pregnant!
I think its very selfish and wrong.Its every childs right to have a mother and father.If a parent dies in an accident or illness,thats a tragedy and unavoidable.I think the world is turning into a selffish society,people only think about what they want and what will make them happy.
Its time to start thinking about what is the right thing to do and put our selfish
'wants' aside!
The world would be a much better place!


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Arellia
The Quiet One


Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 4425
Location: Dallas, TX

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 2:42 pm    

magenta wrote:
I dont understand why a person would deliberately put a child in a situation of no father or no mother?If it be a woman deliberately getting pregnant with the intention of being a single mother.Or a lesbian couple wanting to adopt or one get pregnant!
I think its very selfish and wrong.Its every childs right to have a mother and father.If a parent dies in an accident or illness,thats a tragedy and unavoidable.I think the world is turning into a selffish society,people only think about what they want and what will make them happy.
Its time to start thinking about what is the right thing to do and put our selfish
'wants' aside!
The world would be a much better place!


I can't disagree with you that it's ideal if a child has a mother and father... it's a norm, it's the way it's "supposed" to be, but two good mothers are better than one bad one, and one decent parent is better than having a traditional yet abusive family. There are so many gray areas in families, in lives, that means not everybody has an *ideal* life. Some parents make mistakes... a woman marries an alcoholic, but he won't stop drinking for his child. Which is more wrong--keeping your child around that lifestyle, or saving them from it and raising them alone? The father, in this case, would be the wrong one, but you can't change people even when they should change. All children (at least those in America) have oppurtunities open to them, other people in their lives, and a certain amount of freedom, no matter who their parent(s) are. It would be nice if the world was perfect, if children really had a "right" to the perfect family... but it's not, and we make the best of it.


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
TrekkieMage
Office Junkie


Joined: 17 Oct 2004
Posts: 5335
Location: Hiding

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 3:43 pm    

magenta wrote:
I dont understand why a person would deliberately put a child in a situation of no father or no mother?If it be a woman deliberately getting pregnant with the intention of being a single mother.Or a lesbian couple wanting to adopt or one get pregnant!
I think its very selfish and wrong.Its every childs right to have a mother and father.If a parent dies in an accident or illness,thats a tragedy and unavoidable.I think the world is turning into a selffish society,people only think about what they want and what will make them happy.
Its time to start thinking about what is the right thing to do and put our selfish
'wants' aside!
The world would be a much better place!


I think it is far more important for a child to grow up in a loving, caring, and stable enviornment than to grow up in a "traditional" family. Which would be better for the well being of a child: to grow up with a mother and a father who drank and beat their children, or to grow up in a family where you had two mothers who loved you and provided a stable and happy home?

I know a girl who grew up (well, is growing up) with two mothers. The only problem she ever had was children - elementary school children - teasing her. Her parents love eachother and love her. And she has grown up to be an incredible young woman.

The only "selfish want" I can see in this world is for people to allow their "traditional family values" to disrupt and prevent loving parents from raising their children.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
Republican_Man
STV's Premier Conservative


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 14823
Location: Classified

PostMon Dec 11, 2006 7:19 pm    

I tend to agree with much that's been stated here. I would much rather see a happy child with two moms than an unhappy child with a mom and a dad that are incredibly abusive, a single parent who's not around and not loving, a child who's shifting from foster home to foster home, and so on. Even at the expense of the traditional family, though I would much prefer that a billion times over.


-------signature-------

"Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Oddbeani57
Senior Cadet


Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Location: NoPo.

PostThu Dec 14, 2006 6:01 am    

As for the OP: Wow. That would pretty much be a direct summation of my feelings as of now. The fact that she's pregnant isn't really that stirring in either direction for me, but the fact that it's the VP's lesbian daughter makes it at least interesting.

Go Mary, Go?


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger 
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Goto Page Previous  1, 2
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.



Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Star Trek �, in all its various forms, are trademarks & copyrights of Paramount Pictures
This site has no official connection with Star Trek or Paramount Pictures
Site content/Site design elements owned by Morphy and is meant to only be an archive/Tribute to STV.com